Uniform polyhedron
A uniform polyhedron is a polyhedron which has regular polygons as faces and is vertex-transitive. It follows. Uniform polyhedra may be quasi-regular or semi-regular; the faces and vertices need not be convex, so many of the uniform polyhedra are star polyhedra. There are two infinite classes of uniform polyhedra together with 75 others. Infinite classes prisms antiprisms Convex exceptional 5 Platonic solids – regular convex polyhedra 13 Archimedean solids – 2 quasiregular and 11 semiregular convex polyhedra Star exceptional 4 Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra – regular nonconvex polyhedra 53 uniform star polyhedra – 5 quasiregular and 48 semiregularhence 5 + 13 + 4 + 53 = 75. There are many degenerate uniform polyhedra with pairs of edges that coincide, including one found by John Skilling called the great disnub dirhombidodecahedron. Dual polyhedra to uniform polyhedra are face-transitive and have regular vertex figures, are classified in parallel with their dual polyhedron; the dual of a regular polyhedron is regular, while the dual of an Archimedean solid is a Catalan solid.
The concept of uniform polyhedron is a special case of the concept of uniform polytope, which applies to shapes in higher-dimensional space. Coxeter, Longuet-Higgins & Miller define uniform polyhedra to be vertex-transitive polyhedra with regular faces, they define a polyhedron to be a finite set of polygons such that each side of a polygon is a side of just one other polygon, such that no non-empty proper subset of the polygons has the same property. By a polygon they implicitly mean a polygon in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. There are some generalizations of the concept of a uniform polyhedron. If the connectedness assumption is dropped we get uniform compounds, which can be split as a union of polyhedra, such as the compound of 5 cubes. If we drop the condition that the realization of the polyhedron is non-degenerate we get the so-called degenerate uniform polyhedra; these require a more general definition of polyhedra. Grunbaum gave a rather complicated definition of a polyhedron, while McMullen & Schulte gave a simpler and more general definition of a polyhedron: in their terminology, a polyhedron is a 2-dimensional abstract polytope with a non-degenerate 3-dimensional realization.
Here an abstract polytope is a poset of its "faces" satisfying various condition, a realization is a function from its vertices to some space, the realization is called non-degenerate if any two distinct faces of the abstract polytope have distinct realizations. Some of the ways they can be degenerate are as follows: Hidden faces; some polyhedra have faces that are hidden, in the sense that no points of their interior can be seen from the outside. These are not counted as uniform polyhedra. Degenerate compounds; some polyhedra have multiple edges and their faces are the faces of two or more polyhedra, though these are not compounds in the previous sense since the polyhedra share edges. Double covers. There are some non-orientable polyhedra that have double covers satisfying the definition of a uniform polyhedron. There double covers have doubled faces and vertices, they are not counted as uniform polyhedra. Double faces. There are several polyhedra with doubled faces produced by Wythoff's construction.
Most authors do not remove them as part of the construction. Double edges. Skilling's figure has the property that it has double edges but its faces cannot be written as a union of two uniform polyhedra; the Platonic solids date back to the classical Greeks and were studied by the Pythagoreans, Theaetetus, Timaeus of Locri and Euclid. The Etruscans discovered the regular dodecahedron before 500 BC; the cuboctahedron was known by Plato. Archimedes discovered all of the 13 Archimedean solids, his original book on the subject was lost, but Pappus of Alexandria mentioned Archimedes listed 13 polyhedra. Piero della Francesca rediscovered the five truncation of the Platonic solids: truncated tetrahedron, truncated octahedron, truncated cube, truncated dodecahedron, truncated icosahedron. Luca Pacioli republished Francesca's work in De divina proportione in 1509, adding the rhombicuboctahedron, calling it a icosihexahedron for its 26 faces, drawn by Leonardo da Vinci. Johannes Kepler was the first to publish the complete list of Archimedean solids, in 1619, as well as identified the infinite families of uniform prisms and antiprisms.
Kepler discovered two of the regular Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra and Louis Poinsot discovered the other two. The set of four were named by Arthur Cayley. Of the remaining 53, Edmund Hess discovered two, Albert Badoureau discovered 36 more, Pitsch independently discovered 18, of which 3 had not been discovered. Together these gave 41 polyhedra; the geometer H. S. M. Coxeter did not publish. M. S. Longuet-Higgins and H. C. Longuet-Higgins independently discovered eleven of these. Lesavre and Mercier rediscovered five of them in 1947. Coxeter, Longuet-Higgins & Miller published the list of uniform polyhedra. Sopov (19
Dual polyhedron
In geometry, any polyhedron is associated with a second dual figure, where the vertices of one correspond to the faces of the other and the edges between pairs of vertices of one correspond to the edges between pairs of faces of the other. Such dual figures remain combinatorial or abstract polyhedra, but not all are geometric polyhedra. Starting with any given polyhedron, the dual of its dual is the original polyhedron. Duality preserves the symmetries of a polyhedron. Therefore, for many classes of polyhedra defined by their symmetries, the duals belong to a symmetric class. Thus, the regular polyhedra – the Platonic solids and Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra – form dual pairs, where the regular tetrahedron is self-dual; the dual of an isogonal polyhedron, having equivalent vertices, is one, isohedral, having equivalent faces. The dual of an isotoxal polyhedron is isotoxal. Duality is related to reciprocity or polarity, a geometric transformation that, when applied to a convex polyhedron, realizes the dual polyhedron as another convex polyhedron.
There are many kinds of duality. The kinds most relevant to elementary polyhedra are polar reciprocity and topological or abstract duality; the duality of polyhedra is defined in terms of polar reciprocation about a concentric sphere. Here, each vertex is associated with a face plane so that the ray from the center to the vertex is perpendicular to the plane, the product of the distances from the center to each is equal to the square of the radius. In coordinates, for reciprocation about the sphere x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = r 2, the vertex is associated with the plane x 0 x + y 0 y + z 0 z = r 2; the vertices of the dual are the poles reciprocal to the face planes of the original, the faces of the dual lie in the polars reciprocal to the vertices of the original. Any two adjacent vertices define an edge, these will reciprocate to two adjacent faces which intersect to define an edge of the dual; this dual pair of edges are always orthogonal to each other. If r 0 is the radius of the sphere, r 1 and r 2 the distances from its centre to the pole and its polar, then: r 1.
R 2 = r 0 2 For the more symmetrical polyhedra having an obvious centroid, it is common to make the polyhedron and sphere concentric, as in the Dorman Luke construction described below. However, it is possible to reciprocate a polyhedron about any sphere, the resulting form of the dual will depend on the size and position of the sphere; the choice of center for the sphere is sufficient to define the dual up to similarity. If multiple symmetry axes are present, they will intersect at a single point, this is taken to be the centroid. Failing that, a circumscribed sphere, inscribed sphere, or midsphere is used. If a polyhedron in Euclidean space has an element passing through the center of the sphere, the corresponding element of its dual will go to infinity. Since Euclidean space never reaches infinity, the projective equivalent, called extended Euclidean space, may be formed by adding the required'plane at infinity'; some theorists prefer to say that there is no dual. Meanwhile, Wenninger found a way to represent these infinite duals, in a manner suitable for making models.
The concept of duality here is related to the duality in projective geometry, where lines and edges are interchanged. Projective polarity works well enough for convex polyhedra, but for non-convex figures such as star polyhedra, when we seek to rigorously define this form of polyhedral duality in terms of projective polarity, various problems appear. Because of the definitional issues for geometric duality of non-convex polyhedra, Grünbaum argues that any proper definition of a non-convex polyhedron should include a notion of a dual polyhedron. Any convex polyhedron can be distorted into a canonical form, in which a unit midsphere exists tangent to every edge, such that the average position of the points of tangency is the center of the sphere; this form is unique up to congruences. If we reciprocate such a canonical polyhedron about its midsphere, the dual polyhedron will share the same edge-tangency points and so must be canonical, it is the canonical dual, the two together form a canonical dual pair.
When a pair of polyhedra cannot be obtained by reciprocation from each other, they may be called duals of each other as long as the vertices of one correspond to the faces of the other, the edges of one correspond to the edges of the other, in an incidence-preserving way. Such pairs of polyhedra are abstractly dual; the vertices and edges of a convex polyhedron form a graph, embedded on a topological sphere, the surface of the polyhedron. The same graph can be projected to form
Square antiprism
In geometry, the square antiprism is the second in an infinite set of antiprisms formed by an even-numbered sequence of triangle sides closed by two polygon caps. It is known as an anticube. If all its faces are regular, it is a semiregular uniform polyhedron; when eight points are distributed on the surface of a sphere with the aim of maximising the distance between them in some sense, the resulting shape corresponds to a square antiprism rather than a cube. Specific methods of distributing the points include, for example, the Thomson problem, maximising the distance of each point to the nearest point, or minimising the sum of all reciprocals of squares of distances between points. According to the VSEPR theory of molecular geometry in chemistry, based on the general principle of maximizing the distances between points, a square antiprism is the favoured geometry when eight pairs of electrons surround a central atom. One molecule with this geometry is the octafluoroxenate ion in the salt nitrosonium octafluoroxenate.
Few ions are cubical because such a shape would cause large repulsion between ligands. In addition, the element sulfur forms octatomic S8 molecules as its most stable allotrope; the S8 molecule has a structure based on the square antiprism, in which the eight atoms occupy the eight vertices of the antiprism, the eight triangle-triangle edges of the antiprism correspond to single covalent bonds between sulfur atoms. The main building block of the One World Trade Center has the shape of an tall tapering square antiprism, it is not a true antiprism because of its taper: the top square has half the area of the bottom one. A twisted prism can be made with the same vertex arrangement, it can be seen as the convex form with 4 tetrahedrons excavated around the sides. However, after this it can no longer be triangulated into tetrahedra without adding new vertices, it has half of the symmetry of the uniform solution: D4 order 4. A crossed square antiprism is a star polyhedron, topologically identical to the square antiprism with the same vertex arrangement, but it can't be made uniform.
Its vertex configuration is 3.3/2.3.4, with one triangle retrograde. It has d4d symmetry, order 8; the gyroelongated square pyramid is a Johnson solid constructed by augmenting one a square pyramid. The gyroelongated square bipyramid is a deltahedron constructed by replacing both squares of a square antiprism with a square pyramid; the snub disphenoid is another deltahedron, constructed by replacing the two squares of a square antiprism by pairs of equilateral triangles. The snub square antiprism can be seen as a square antiprism with a chain of equilateral triangles inserted around the middle; the sphenocorona and the sphenomegacorona are other Johnson solids that, like the square antiprism, consist of two squares and an number of equilateral triangles. The square antiprism can be truncated and alternated to form a snub antiprism: As an antiprism, the square antiprism belongs to a family of polyhedra that includes the octahedron, the pentagonal antiprism, the hexagonal antiprism, the octagonal antiprism.
The square antiprism is first in a series of snub polyhedra and tilings with vertex figure 3.3.4.3.n. Biscornu Compound of three square antiprisms Weisstein, Eric W. "Antiprism". MathWorld. Square Antiprism interactive model Virtual Reality Polyhedra www.georgehart.com: The Encyclopedia of Polyhedra VRML model Conway Notation for Polyhedra Try: "A4"
Point groups in three dimensions
In geometry, a point group in three dimensions is an isometry group in three dimensions that leaves the origin fixed, or correspondingly, an isometry group of a sphere. It is a subgroup of the orthogonal group O, the group of all isometries that leave the origin fixed, or correspondingly, the group of orthogonal matrices. O itself is a subgroup of the Euclidean group E of all isometries. Symmetry groups of objects are isometry groups. Accordingly, analysis of isometry groups is analysis of possible symmetries. All isometries of a bounded 3D object have one or more common fixed points. We choose the origin as one of them; the symmetry group of an object is sometimes called full symmetry group, as opposed to its rotation group or proper symmetry group, the intersection of its full symmetry group and the rotation group SO of the 3D space itself. The rotation group of an object is equal to its full symmetry group if and only if the object is chiral; the point groups in three dimensions are used in chemistry to describe the symmetries of a molecule and of molecular orbitals forming covalent bonds, in this context they are called molecular point groups.
Finite Coxeter groups are a special set of point groups generated purely by a set of reflectional mirrors passing through the same point. A rank n Coxeter group is represented by a Coxeter -- Dynkin diagram. Coxeter notation offers a bracketed notation equivalent to the Coxeter diagram, with markup symbols for rotational and other subsymmetry point groups. SO is a subgroup of E +, which consists of i.e. isometries preserving orientation. O is the direct product of SO and the group generated by inversion: O = SO × Thus there is a 1-to-1 correspondence between all direct isometries and all indirect isometries, through inversion. There is a 1-to-1 correspondence between all groups of direct isometries H in O and all groups K of isometries in O that contain inversion: K = H × H = K ∩ SOFor instance, if H is C2 K is C2h, or if H is C3 K is S6. If a group of direct isometries H has a subgroup L of index 2 apart from the corresponding group containing inversion there is a corresponding group that contains indirect isometries but no inversion: M = L ∪ where isometry is identified with A.
An example would be C4 for H and S4 for M. Thus M is obtained from H by inverting the isometries in H ∖ L; this group M is as abstract group isomorphic with H. Conversely, for all isometry groups that contain indirect isometries but no inversion we can obtain a rotation group by inverting the indirect isometries; this is clarifying when see below. In 2D the cyclic group of k-fold rotations Ck is for every positive integer k a normal subgroup of O and SO. Accordingly, in 3D, for every axis the cyclic group of k-fold rotations about that axis is a normal subgroup of the group of all rotations about that axis. Since any subgroup of index two is normal, the group of rotations is normal both in the group obtained by adding reflections in planes through the axis and in the group obtained by adding a reflection plane perpendicular to the axis; the isometries of R3 that leave the origin fixed, forming the group O, can be categorized as follows: SO: identity rotation about an axis through the origin by an angle not equal to 180° rotation about an axis through the origin by an angle of 180° the same with inversion, i.e. respectively: inversion rotation about an axis by an angle not equal to 180°, combined with reflection in the plane through the origin perpendicular to the axis reflection in a plane through the originThe 4th and 5th in particular, in a wider sense the 6th are called improper rotations.
See the similar overview including translations. When comparing the symmetry type of two objects, the origin is chosen for each separately, i.e. they need not have the same center. Moreover, two objects are considered to be of the same symmetry type if their symmetry groups are conjugate subgroups of O. For example, two 3D objects have the same symmetry type: if both have mirror symmetry, but with respect to a different mirror plane if both have 3-fold rotational symmetry, but with respect to a different axis. In the case of multiple mirror planes and/or axes of rotation, two symmetry groups are of the same symmetry type if and only if there is a rotation mapping the whole structure of the first symmetry group to that of the second; the conjugacy definition would allow a mirror image of the structure, but this is not needed, the structure itself is achiral. For example, if a symmetry group contains a 3-fold axis of rotation, it contains rotations in two opposite directions. There are many infinite isometry groups.
We may create non-cyclical abelian groups by adding more rotations around the same axis. There are non-abelian groups generated by rotations around different axes; these are free groups. They will be infinite. All the infinite groups mentioned so far are not closed as topological subgroups of O. We now discuss
Conway polyhedron notation
In geometry, Conway polyhedron notation, invented by John Horton Conway and promoted by George W. Hart, is used to describe polyhedra based on a seed polyhedron modified by various prefix operations. Conway and Hart extended the idea of using operators, like truncation as defined by Kepler, to build related polyhedra of the same symmetry. For example, tC represents a truncated cube, taC, parsed as t, is a truncated cuboctahedron; the simplest operator dual swaps vertex and face elements. Applied in a series, these operators allow many higher order polyhedra to be generated. Conway defined the operators abdegjkmost, while Hart added r and p. Conway's basic operations are sufficient to generate the Archimedean and Catalan solids from the Platonic solids; some basic operations can be made as composites of others. Implementations named further operators, sometimes referred to as "extended" operators. In general, it is difficult to predict the resulting appearance of the composite of two or more operations from a given seed polyhedron.
For instance, ambo applied twice is the expand operation: aa = e, while a truncation after ambo produces bevel: ta = b. Many basic questions about Conway operators remain open, for instance, how many operators of a given "size" exist. In Conway's notation, operations on polyhedra are applied from right to left. For example, a cuboctahedron is an ambo cube, i.e. a = a C, a truncated cuboctahedron is t = t = t a C. Repeated application of an operator can be denoted with an exponent: j2. In general, Conway operators are not commutative; the resulting polyhedron has a fixed topology, while exact geometry is not specified: it can be thought of as one of many embeddings of a polyhedral graph on the sphere. The polyhedron is put into canonical form. Individual operators can be visualized in terms of "chambers", as below; each white chamber is a rotated version of the others. For achiral operators, the red chambers are a reflection of the white chambers. Achiral and chiral operators are called local symmetry-preserving operations and local operations that preserve orientation-preserving symmetries although the exact definition is a little more restrictive.
The relationship between the number of vertices and faces of the seed and the polyhedron created by the operations listed in this article can be expressed as a matrix M x. When x is the operator, v, e, f are the vertices and faces of the seed, v ′, e ′, f ′ are the vertices and faces of the result M x =; the matrix for the composition of two operators is just the product of the matrixes for the two operators. Distinct operators may have the same matrix, for p and l; the edge count of the result is an integer multiple d of that of the seed: this is called the inflation rate, or the edge factor. The simplest operators, the identity operator S and the dual operator d, have simple matrix forms: M S = = I 3, M d = Two dual operators cancel out; when applied to other operators, the dual operator corresponds to horizontal and vertical reflections of the matrix. Operators can be grouped into groups of four by identifying the operators x, xd, dx, dxd. In this article, only the matrix for x is given. Hart introduced the reflection operator r.
This is not a LOPSP, since it does not preserve orientation. R has no effect on achiral seeds, rr returns the original seed. An overline can be used to indicate the other chiral form of an operator. R does not affect the matrix. An operation is irreducible if it cannot be expressed as a composition of operators aside from d and r; the majority of Conway's original operators are irreducible: the exceptions are e, b, o, m. Some open questions about Conway
Triangle
A triangle is a polygon with three edges and three vertices. It is one of the basic shapes in geometry. A triangle with vertices A, B, C is denoted △ A B C. In Euclidean geometry any three points, when non-collinear, determine a unique triangle and a unique plane. In other words, there is only one plane that contains that triangle, every triangle is contained in some plane. If the entire geometry is only the Euclidean plane, there is only one plane and all triangles are contained in it; this article is about triangles in Euclidean geometry, in particular, the Euclidean plane, except where otherwise noted. Triangles can be classified according to the lengths of their sides: An equilateral triangle has all sides the same length. An equilateral triangle is a regular polygon with all angles measuring 60°. An isosceles triangle has two sides of equal length. An isosceles triangle has two angles of the same measure, namely the angles opposite to the two sides of the same length; some mathematicians define an isosceles triangle to have two equal sides, whereas others define an isosceles triangle as one with at least two equal sides.
The latter definition would make all equilateral triangles isosceles triangles. The 45–45–90 right triangle, which appears in the tetrakis square tiling, is isosceles. A scalene triangle has all its sides of different lengths. Equivalently, it has all angles of different measure. Hatch marks called tick marks, are used in diagrams of triangles and other geometric figures to identify sides of equal lengths. A side can be marked with a pattern of short line segments in the form of tally marks. In a triangle, the pattern is no more than 3 ticks. An equilateral triangle has the same pattern on all 3 sides, an isosceles triangle has the same pattern on just 2 sides, a scalene triangle has different patterns on all sides since no sides are equal. Patterns of 1, 2, or 3 concentric arcs inside the angles are used to indicate equal angles. An equilateral triangle has the same pattern on all 3 angles, an isosceles triangle has the same pattern on just 2 angles, a scalene triangle has different patterns on all angles since no angles are equal.
Triangles can be classified according to their internal angles, measured here in degrees. A right triangle has one of its interior angles measuring 90°; the side opposite to the right angle is the longest side of the triangle. The other two sides are called the catheti of the triangle. Right triangles obey the Pythagorean theorem: the sum of the squares of the lengths of the two legs is equal to the square of the length of the hypotenuse: a2 + b2 = c2, where a and b are the lengths of the legs and c is the length of the hypotenuse. Special right triangles are right triangles with additional properties that make calculations involving them easier. One of the two most famous is the 3–4–5 right triangle, where 32 + 42 = 52. In this situation, 3, 4, 5 are a Pythagorean triple; the other one is an isosceles triangle. Triangles that do not have an angle measuring 90° are called oblique triangles. A triangle with all interior angles measuring less than 90° is an acute triangle or acute-angled triangle.
If c is the length of the longest side a2 + b2 > c2, where a and b are the lengths of the other sides. A triangle with one interior angle measuring more than 90° is an obtuse triangle or obtuse-angled triangle. If c is the length of the longest side a2 + b2 < c2, where a and b are the lengths of the other sides. A triangle with an interior angle of 180° is degenerate. A right degenerate triangle has collinear vertices. A triangle that has two angles with the same measure has two sides with the same length, therefore it is an isosceles triangle, it follows that in a triangle where all angles have the same measure, all three sides have the same length, such a triangle is therefore equilateral. Triangles are assumed to be two-dimensional plane figures. In rigorous treatments, a triangle is therefore called a 2-simplex. Elementary facts about triangles were presented by Euclid in books 1–4 of his Elements, around 300 BC; the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a triangle in Euclidean space is always 180 degrees.
This fact is equivalent to Euclid's parallel postulate. This allows determination of the measure of the third angle of any triangle given the measure of two angles. An exterior angle of a triangle is an angle, a linear pair to an interior angle; the measure of an exterior angle of a triangle is equal to the sum of the measures of the two interior angles that are not adjacent to it. The sum of the measures of the three exterior angles of any triangle is 360 degrees. Two triangles are said to be similar if every angle of one triangle has the same measure as the corresponding angle in the other triangle; the corresponding sides of similar triangles have lengths that are in the same proportion, this property is sufficient to establish similarity. Some basic theorems about similar triangles are: If and only if one pair of internal angles of two triangles have the sam
Trapezohedron
The n-gonal trapezohedron, antibipyramid or deltohedron is the dual polyhedron of an n-gonal antiprism. With a highest symmetry, its 2n faces are congruent kites; the faces are symmetrically staggered. The n-gon part of the name does not reference the faces here but arrangement of vertices around an axis of symmetry; the dual n-gonal antiprism has two actual n-gon faces. An n-gonal trapezohedron can be dissected into an n-gonal antiprism; these figures, sometimes called deltohedra, must not be confused with deltahedra, whose faces are equilateral triangles. In texts describing the crystal habits of minerals, the word trapezohedron is used for the polyhedron properly known as a deltoidal icositetrahedron; the symmetry group of an n-gonal trapezohedron is Dnd of order 4n, except in the case of a cube, which has the larger symmetry group Od of order 48, which has four versions of D3d as subgroups. The rotation group is Dn of order 2n, except in the case of a cube, which has the larger rotation group O of order 24, which has four versions of D3 as subgroups.
One degree of freedom within Dn symmetry changes the kites into congruent quadrilaterals with 3 edges lengths. In the limit, one edge of each quadrilateral goes to zero length, these become bipyramids. If the kites surrounding the two peaks are of different shapes, it can only have Cnv symmetry, order 2n; these can be called asymmetric trapezohedra. The dual is an unequal antiprism, with the bottom polygons of different radii. If it twisted and unequal its symmetry is reduced to cyclic symmetry, Cn symmetry, order n. A n-trapezohedron has 2n quadrilateral faces, with 2n+2 vertices. Two vertices are on the polar axis, the others are in two regular n-gonal rings of vertices. Special cases: n=2: A degenerate form, form a geometric tetrahedron with 6 vertices, 8 edges, 4 degenerate kite faces that are degenerated into triangles, its dual is a degenerate form of antiprism a tetrahedron. N=3: In the case of the dual of a triangular antiprism the kites are rhombi, hence these trapezohedra are zonohedra.
They are called rhombohedra. They are cubes scaled in the direction of a body diagonal, they are the parallelepipeds with congruent rhombic faces. A special case of a rhombohedron is one in which the rhombi which form the faces have angles of 60° and 120°, it can be decomposed into a regular octahedron. Since parallelepipeds can fill space, so can a combination of regular tetrahedra and regular octahedra. Crystal arrangements of atoms can repeat in space with hexagonal trapezohedral cells; the pentagonal trapezohedron is the only polyhedron other than the Platonic solids used as a die in roleplaying games such as Dungeons & Dragons. Having 10 sides, it can be used in repetition to generate any decimal-based uniform probability desired. Two dice of different colors are used for the two digits to represent numbers from 00 to 99. Self-intersecting trapezohedron exist with a star polygon central figure, defined by kite faces connecting each polygon edge to these two points. A p/q-trapezohedron has Coxeter-Dynkin diagram.
Diminished trapezohedron Rhombic dodecahedron Rhombic triacontahedron Bipyramid Conway polyhedron notation Anthony Pugh. Polyhedra: A visual approach. California: University of California Press Berkeley. ISBN 0-520-03056-7. Chapter 4: Duals of the Archimedean polyhedra and antiprisms Weisstein, Eric W. "Trapezohedron". MathWorld. Weisstein, Eric W. "Isohedron". MathWorld. Virtual Reality Polyhedra The Encyclopedia of Polyhedra VRML models <3> <4> <5> <6> <7> <8> <9> <10> Conway Notation for Polyhedra Try: "dAn", where n=3,4,5... example "dA5" is a pentagonal trapezohedron. Paper model tetragonal trapezohedron