Braid group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The 24 elements of a permutation group on 4 elements as braids. All crossings shown are of the left-over-right type, but other choices are possible. Changing the order of the operations can change the result, meaning that the operations are non-commutative.

In mathematics, the braid group on n strands (denoted Bn), also known as the Artin braid group,[1] is the group whose elements are equivalence classes of n-braids (e.g. under ambient isotopy), and whose group operation is composition of braids (see § Introduction). Example applications of braid groups include knot theory, where any knot may be represented as the closure of certain braids (a result known as Alexander's theorem); in mathematical physics where Artin's canonical presentation of the braid group corresponds to the Yang–Baxter equation (see § Basic properties); and in monodromy invariants of algebraic geometry.[2]


Intuitive description[edit]

In this introduction let n = 4; the generalization to other values of n will be straightforward. Consider two sets of four items lying on a table, with the items in each set being arranged in a vertical line, and such that one set sits next to the other. (In the illustrations below, these are the black dots.) Using four strands, each item of the first set is connected with an item of the second set so that a one-to-one correspondence results. Such a connection is called a braid. Often some strands will have to pass over or under others, and this is crucial: the following two connections are different braids:

The braid sigma 1^(-1)    is different from    The braid sigma 1

On the other hand, two such connections which can be made to look the same by "pulling the strands" are considered the same braid:

The braid sigma 1^(-1)     is the same as    Another representation of sigma 1^(-1)

All strands are required to move from left to right; knots like the following are not considered braids:

Not a braid    is not a braid

Any two braids can be composed by drawing the first next to the second, identifying the four items in the middle, and connecting corresponding strands:

Braid s3.png     composed with     Braid s2.png     yields     Braid s3s2.png

Another example:

Braid s1 inv s3 inv.png     composed with     Braid s1 s3 inv.png     yields     Braid s3 inv squared.png

The composition of the braids σ and τ is written as στ.

The set of all braids on four strands is denoted by B4. The above composition of braids is indeed a group operation. The identity element is the braid consisting of four parallel horizontal strands, and the inverse of a braid consists of that braid which "undoes" whatever the first braid did, which is obtained by flipping a diagram such as the ones above across a vertical line going through its centre. (The first two example braids above are inverses of each other.)

Formal treatment[edit]

To put the above informal discussion of braid groups on firm ground, one needs to use the homotopy concept of algebraic topology, defining braid groups as fundamental groups of a configuration space. Alternatively, one can define the braid group purely algebraically via the braid relations, keeping the pictures in mind only to guide the intuition.


Braid groups were introduced explicitly by Emil Artin in 1925, although (as Wilhelm Magnus pointed out in 1974[3]) they were already implicit in Adolf Hurwitz's work on monodromy from 1891. In fact, as Magnus says, Hurwitz gave the interpretation of a braid group as the fundamental group of a configuration space (cf. braid theory), an interpretation that was lost from view until it was rediscovered by Ralph Fox and Lee Neuwirth in 1962.[4]

Basic properties[edit]

Generators and relations[edit]

Consider the following three braids:

   Braid s1.png       Braid s2.png       Braid s3.png   

Every braid in can be written as a composition of a number of these braids and their inverses. In other words, these three braids generate the group . To see this, an arbitrary braid is scanned from left to right for crossings; beginning at the top, whenever a crossing of strands and is encountered, or is written down, depending on whether strand moves under or over strand . Upon reaching the right end, the braid has been written as a product of the σ's and their inverses.

It is clear that

(i) σ1σ3 = σ3σ1,

while the following two relations are not quite as obvious:

(iia) σ1σ2σ1 = σ2σ1σ2,
(iib) σ2σ3σ2 = σ3σ2σ3

(these relations can be appreciated best by drawing the braid on a piece of paper). It can be shown that all other relations among the braids , and already follow from these relations and the group axioms.

Generalising this example to strands, the group can be abstractly defined via the following presentation:

where in the first group of relations 1 ≤ i ≤ n−2 and in the second group of relations, |i − j| ≥ 2. This presentation leads to generalisations of braid groups called Artin groups. The cubic relations, known as the braid relations, play an important role in the theory of Yang–Baxter equation.

Further properties[edit]

  • The braid group B1 is trivial, B2 is an infinite cyclic group Z, and B3 is isomorphic to the knot group of the trefoil knot – in particular, it is an infinite non-abelian group.
  • The n-strand braid group Bn embeds as a subgroup into the (n+1)-strand braid group Bn+1 by adding an extra strand that does not cross any of the first n strands. The increasing union of the braid groups with all n ≥ 1 is the infinite braid group B.
  • All non-identity elements of Bn have infinite order; i.e., Bn is torsion-free.
  • There is a left-invariant linear order on Bn called the Dehornoy order.
  • For n ≥ 3, Bn contains a subgroup isomorphic to the free group on two generators.
  • There is a homomorphism BnZ defined by σi ↦ 1. So for instance, the braid σ2σ3σ1−1σ2σ3 is mapped to 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 + 1 = 3. This map corresponds to the abelianization of the braid group.


Relation with symmetric group and the pure braid group[edit]

By forgetting how the strands twist and cross, every braid on n strands determines a permutation on n elements. This assignment is onto, compatible with composition, and therefore becomes a surjective group homomorphism BnSn from the braid group into the symmetric group. The image of the braid σiBn is the transposition si = (i, i+1) ∈ Sn. These transpositions generate the symmetric group, satisfy the braid group relations, and have order 2. This transforms the Artin presentation of the braid group into the Coxeter presentation of the symmetric group:

The kernel of the homomorphism BnSn is the subgroup of Bn called the pure braid group on n strands and denoted Pn. In a pure braid, the beginning and the end of each strand are in the same position. Pure braid groups fit into a short exact sequence

This sequence splits and therefore pure braid groups are realized as iterated semi-direct products of free groups.

Relation between B3 and the modular group[edit]

B3 is the universal central extension of the modular group.

The braid group B3 is the universal central extension of the modular group PSL(2, Z), with these sitting as lattices inside the (topological) universal covering group

Furthermore, the modular group has trivial center, and thus the modular group is isomorphic to the quotient group of B3 modulo its center, Z(B3), and equivalently, to the group of inner automorphisms of B3.

Here is a construction of this isomorphism. Define

From the braid relations it follows that a2 = b3. Denoting this latter product as c, one may verify from the braid relations that

implying that c is in the center of B3. Let C denote the subgroup of B3 generated by c, since C ⊂ Z(B3), it is a normal subgroup and one may take the quotient group B3/C. We claim B3/C ≅ PSL(2, Z); this isomorphism can be given an explicit form. The cosets σ1C and σ2C map to

where L and R are the standard left and right moves on the Stern–Brocot tree; it is well known that these moves generate the modular group.

Alternately, one common presentation for the modular group is


Mapping a to v and b to p yields a surjective group homomorphism B3 → PSL(2, Z).

The center of B3 is equal to C, a consequence of the facts that c is in the center, the modular group has trivial center, and the above surjective homomorphism has kernel C.

Relationship to the mapping class group and classification of braids[edit]

The braid group Bn can be shown to be isomorphic to the mapping class group of a punctured disk with n punctures. This is most easily visualized by imagining each puncture as being connected by a string to the boundary of the disk; each mapping homomorphism that permutes two of the punctures can then be seen to be a homotopy of the strings, that is, a braiding of these strings.

Via this mapping class group interpretation of braids, each braid may be classified as periodic, reducible or pseudo-Anosov.

Connection to knot theory[edit]

If a braid is given and one connects the first left-hand item to the first right-hand item using a new string, the second left-hand item to the second right-hand item etc. (without creating any braids in the new strings), one obtains a link, and sometimes a knot. Alexander's theorem in braid theory states that the converse is true as well: every knot and every link arises in this fashion from at least one braid; such a braid can be obtained by cutting the link. Since braids can be concretely given as words in the generators σi, this is often the preferred method of entering knots into computer programs.

Computational aspects[edit]

The word problem for the braid relations is efficiently solvable and there exists a normal form for elements of Bn in terms of the generators σ1, ..., σn−1. (In essence, computing the normal form of a braid is the algebraic analogue of "pulling the strands" as illustrated in our second set of images above.) The free GAP computer algebra system can carry out computations in Bn if the elements are given in terms of these generators. There is also a package called CHEVIE for GAP3 with special support for braid groups. The word problem is also efficiently solved via the Lawrence–Krammer representation.

Since there are nevertheless several hard computational problems about braid groups, applications in cryptography have been suggested.


In analogy with the action of the symmetric group by permutations, in various mathematical settings there exists a natural action of the braid group on n-tuples of objects or on the n-folded tensor product that involves some "twists". Consider an arbitrary group G and let X be the set of all n-tuples of elements of G whose product is the identity element of G. Then Bn acts on X in the following fashion:

Thus the elements xi and xi+1 exchange places and, in addition, xi is twisted by the inner automorphism corresponding to xi+1 — this ensures that the product of the components of x remains the identity element. It may be checked that the braid group relations are satisfied and this formula indeed defines a group action of Bn on X. As another example, a braided monoidal category is a monoidal category with a braid group action. Such structures play an important role in modern mathematical physics and lead to quantum knot invariants.


Elements of the braid group Bn can be represented more concretely by matrices. One classical such representation is Burau representation, where the matrix entries are single variable Laurent polynomials. It had been a long-standing question whether Burau representation was faithful, but the answer turned out to be negative for n ≥ 5. More generally, it was a major open problem whether braid groups were linear. In 1990, Ruth Lawrence described a family of more general "Lawrence representations" depending on several parameters. In 1996, C. Nayak and Frank Wilczek posited that in analogy to projective representations of SO(3), the projective representations of the braid group have a physical meaning for certain quasiparticles in the fractional quantum hall effect. Around 2001 Stephen Bigelow and Daan Krammer independently proved that all braid groups are linear. Their work used the Lawrence–Krammer representation of dimension n(n−1)/2 depending on the variables q and t. By suitably specializing these variables, the braid group Bn may be realized as a subgroup of the general linear group over the complex numbers.

Infinitely generated braid groups[edit]

There are many ways to generalize this notion to an infinite number of strands. The simplest way is to take the direct limit of braid groups, where the attaching maps send the generators of to the first generators of (i.e., by attaching a trivial strand). Fabel has shown that there are two topologies that can be imposed on the resulting group each of whose completion yields a different group. One is a very tame group and is isomorphic to the mapping class group of the infinitely punctured disk—a discrete set of punctures limiting to the boundary of the disk.

The second group can be thought of the same as with finite braid groups. Place a strand at each of the points and the set of all braids—where a braid is defined to be a collection of paths from the points to the points so that the function yields a permutation on endpoints—is isomorphic to this wilder group. An interesting fact is that the pure braid group in this group is isomorphic to both the inverse limit of finite pure braid groups and to the fundamental group of the Hilbert cube minus the set


The cohomology of a group is defined as the cohomology of the corresponding Eilenberg–MacLane classifying space, , which is a CW complex uniquely determined by up to homotopy. A classifying space for the braid group is the nth unordered configuration space of , that is, the set of distinct unordered points in the plane:[5]


So by definition


The calculations for coefficients in can be found in Fuchs 1970.[6]

Similarly, a classifying space for the pure braid group is , the nth ordered configuration space of . In 1968 Vladimir Arnold showed that the integral cohomology of the pure braid group is the quotient of the exterior algebra generated by the collection of degree-one classes , subject to the relations[7]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Weisstein, Eric. "Braid Group". Wolfram Mathworld.
  2. ^ Cohen, Daniel; Suciu, Alexander (1997). "The Braid Monodromy of Plane Algebraic Curves and Hyperplane Arrangements". Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 72. 72 (2): 285–315. arXiv:alg-geom/9608001. doi:10.1007/s000140050017.
  3. ^ Magnus, Wilhelm (1974). "Braid groups: A survey". Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Theory of Groups. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 372. Springer. pp. 463–487. ISBN 978-3-540-06845-7.
  4. ^ Fox, Ralph; Neuwirth, Lee (1962). "The braid groups". Mathematica Scandinavica. 10: 119–126. doi:10.7146/math.scand.a-10518. MR 0150755.
  5. ^ Ghrist, Robert (2009-12-01). Braids. Lecture Notes Series, Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore. Volume 19. WORLD SCIENTIFIC. pp. 263–304. doi:10.1142/9789814291415_0004. ISBN 9789814291408.
  6. ^ Fuks, Dmitry B. (1970). Cohomology of the braid group mod 2. Functional Analysis and its Applications. 4. pp. 143–151. doi:10.1007/BF01094491. MR 0274463.
  7. ^ Arnol'd, Vladimir. "The cohomology ring of the colored braid group" (PDF).


Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]