1.
Abstract algebra
–
In algebra, which is a broad division of mathematics, abstract algebra is the study of algebraic structures. Algebraic structures include groups, rings, fields, modules, vector spaces, lattices, the term abstract algebra was coined in the early 20th century to distinguish this area of study from the other parts of algebra. Algebraic structures, with their homomorphisms, form mathematical categories. Category theory is a formalism that allows a way for expressing properties. Universal algebra is a subject that studies types of algebraic structures as single objects. For example, the structure of groups is an object in universal algebra. As in other parts of mathematics, concrete problems and examples have played important roles in the development of abstract algebra, through the end of the nineteenth century, many – perhaps most – of these problems were in some way related to the theory of algebraic equations. Numerous textbooks in abstract algebra start with definitions of various algebraic structures. This creates an impression that in algebra axioms had come first and then served as a motivation. The true order of development was almost exactly the opposite. For example, the numbers of the nineteenth century had kinematic and physical motivations. An archetypical example of this progressive synthesis can be seen in the history of group theory, there were several threads in the early development of group theory, in modern language loosely corresponding to number theory, theory of equations, and geometry. Leonhard Euler considered algebraic operations on numbers modulo an integer, modular arithmetic, lagranges goal was to understand why equations of third and fourth degree admit formulae for solutions, and he identified as key objects permutations of the roots. An important novel step taken by Lagrange in this paper was the view of the roots, i. e. as symbols. However, he did not consider composition of permutations, serendipitously, the first edition of Edward Warings Meditationes Algebraicae appeared in the same year, with an expanded version published in 1782. Waring proved the theorem on symmetric functions, and specially considered the relation between the roots of a quartic equation and its resolvent cubic. Kronecker claimed in 1888 that the study of modern algebra began with this first paper of Vandermonde, cauchy states quite clearly that Vandermonde had priority over Lagrange for this remarkable idea, which eventually led to the study of group theory. Paolo Ruffini was the first person to develop the theory of permutation groups and his goal was to establish the impossibility of an algebraic solution to a general algebraic equation of degree greater than four

2.
Absolutely convex set
–
A set C in a real or complex vector space is said to be absolutely convex or disked if it is convex and balanced, in which case it is called a disk. The absolutely convex hull of the set A is defined to be absconv A =, Vector, for vectors in physics Vector field Robertson, A. P. W. J. Robertson

3.
Additive inverse
–
In mathematics, the additive inverse of a number a is the number that, when added to a, yields zero. This number is known as the opposite, sign change. For a real number, it reverses its sign, the opposite to a number is negative. Zero is the inverse of itself. The additive inverse of a is denoted by unary minus, −a. For example, the inverse of 7 is −7, because 7 + =0. The additive inverse is defined as its inverse element under the operation of addition. As for any operation, double additive inverse has no net effect. For a number and, generally, in any ring, the inverse can be calculated using multiplication by −1. Examples of rings of numbers are integers, rational numbers, real numbers, Additive inverse is closely related to subtraction, which can be viewed as an addition of the opposite, a − b = a +. Conversely, additive inverse can be thought of as subtraction from zero, if such an operation admits an identity element o, then this element is unique. For a given x , if there exists x′ such that x + x′ = o , if + is associative, then an additive inverse is unique. To see this, let x′ and x″ each be additive inverses of x, for example, since addition of real numbers is associative, each real number has a unique additive inverse. All the following examples are in fact abelian groups, complex numbers, on the complex plane, this operation rotates a complex number 180 degrees around the origin. Addition of real- and complex-valued functions, here, the inverse of a function f is the function −f defined by = − f , for all x, such that f + = o . More generally, what precedes applies to all functions with values in a group, sequences, matrices. In a vector space the additive inverse −v is often called the vector of v, it has the same magnitude as the original. Additive inversion corresponds to multiplication by −1

4.
Associative property
–
In mathematics, the associative property is a property of some binary operations. In propositional logic, associativity is a rule of replacement for expressions in logical proofs. That is, rearranging the parentheses in such an expression will not change its value, consider the following equations, +4 =2 + =92 × = ×4 =24. Even though the parentheses were rearranged on each line, the values of the expressions were not altered, since this holds true when performing addition and multiplication on any real numbers, it can be said that addition and multiplication of real numbers are associative operations. Associativity is not to be confused with commutativity, which addresses whether or not the order of two operands changes the result. For example, the order doesnt matter in the multiplication of numbers, that is. Associative operations are abundant in mathematics, in fact, many algebraic structures explicitly require their binary operations to be associative, however, many important and interesting operations are non-associative, some examples include subtraction, exponentiation and the vector cross product. Z = x = xyz for all x, y, z in S, the associative law can also be expressed in functional notation thus, f = f. If a binary operation is associative, repeated application of the produces the same result regardless how valid pairs of parenthesis are inserted in the expression. This is called the generalized associative law, thus the product can be written unambiguously as abcd. As the number of elements increases, the number of ways to insert parentheses grows quickly. Some examples of associative operations include the following, the two methods produce the same result, string concatenation is associative. In arithmetic, addition and multiplication of numbers are associative, i. e. + z = x + = x + y + z z = x = x y z } for all x, y, z ∈ R. x, y, z\in \mathbb. }Because of associativity. Addition and multiplication of numbers and quaternions are associative. Addition of octonions is also associative, but multiplication of octonions is non-associative, the greatest common divisor and least common multiple functions act associatively. Gcd = gcd = gcd lcm = lcm = lcm } for all x, y, z ∈ Z. x, y, z\in \mathbb. }Taking the intersection or the union of sets, ∩ C = A ∩ = A ∩ B ∩ C ∪ C = A ∪ = A ∪ B ∪ C } for all sets A, B, C. Slightly more generally, given four sets M, N, P and Q, with h, M to N, g, N to P, in short, composition of maps is always associative. Consider a set with three elements, A, B, and C, thus, for example, A=C = A

5.
Cauchy sequence
–
In mathematics, a Cauchy sequence, named after Augustin-Louis Cauchy, is a sequence whose elements become arbitrarily close to each other as the sequence progresses. More precisely, given any small positive distance, all but a number of elements of the sequence are less than that given distance from each other. It is not sufficient for each term to become close to the preceding term. For instance, in the harmonic series ∑1 n a difference between consecutive terms decreases as 1 n, however the series does not converge, rather, it is required that all terms get arbitrarily close to each other, starting from some point. More formally, for any given ε >0 there exists an N such that for any m, n > N. The notions above are not as unfamiliar as they might at first appear, the customary acceptance of the fact that any real number x has a decimal expansion is an implicit acknowledgment that a particular Cauchy sequence of rational numbers has the real limit x. In some cases it may be difficult to describe x independently of such a process involving rational numbers. Generalizations of Cauchy sequences in more abstract uniform spaces exist in the form of Cauchy filters, in a similar way one can define Cauchy sequences of rational or complex numbers. Cauchy formulated such a condition by requiring x m − x n to be infinitesimal for every pair of infinite m, n, to define Cauchy sequences in any metric space X, the absolute value |xm - xn| is replaced by the distance d between xm and xn. A metric space X in which every Cauchy sequence converges to an element of X is called complete, the real numbers are complete under the metric induced by the usual absolute value, and one of the standard constructions of the real numbers involves Cauchy sequences of rational numbers. A rather different type of example is afforded by a metric space X which has the discrete metric, any Cauchy sequence of elements of X must be constant beyond some fixed point, and converges to the eventually repeating term. The rational numbers Q are not complete, There are sequences of rationals that converge to irrational numbers, if one considers this as a sequence of real numbers, however, it converges to the real number φ = /2, the Golden ratio, which is irrational. Every Cauchy sequence of numbers is bounded. Every Cauchy sequence of numbers is bounded, hence by Bolzano-Weierstrass has a convergent subsequence, hence is itself convergent. It should be noted, though, that proof of the completeness of the real numbers implicitly makes use of the least upper bound axiom. The alternative approach, mentioned above, of constructing the real numbers as the completion of the rational numbers, makes the completeness of the real numbers tautological. Such a series ∑ n =1 ∞ x n is considered to be convergent if and only if the sequence of sums is convergent. It is a matter to determine whether the sequence of partial sums is Cauchy or not