1.
Herman Goldstine
–
Herman Heine Goldstine was a mathematician and computer scientist, who was one of the original developers of ENIAC, the first of the modern electronic digital computers. Herman Heine Goldstine was born in Chicago in 1913 to Jewish parents and he attended the University of Chicago, where he joined the Phi Beta Kappa fraternity, and graduated with a degree in Mathematics in 1933, a masters degree in 1934, and a PhD in 1936. For three years he was an assistant under Gilbert Ames Bliss, an authority on the mathematical theory of external ballistics. In 1939 Goldstine began a career at the University of Michigan, until the United States entry into World War II. In 1941 he married Adele Katz, who was an ENIAC programmer and he had a daughter and a son with Adele, who died in 1964. Two years later he married secondly Ellen Watson, Goldstine died on June 16,2004 at his home in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, after a long struggle with Parkinsons disease. His death was announced by the Thomas J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, New York, as a result of the United States entering World War II, Goldstine left the University of Michigan where he was a professor in July,1942 to enlist in the Army. He was commissioned a lieutenant and worked as an ordnance mathematician calculating firing tables at the Ballistic Research Laboratory at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, the firing tables were used in battle to find the appropriate elevation and azimuth for aiming artillery, which had a range of several miles. The firing table calculations were accomplished by one hundred women operating mechanical desk calculators. Each combination of gun, round and geographical region required a set of firing tables. It took about 750 calculations to compute a trajectory and each table had about 3,000 trajectories. It took human computer at least 7 hours to calculate one trajectory, Mauchly wrote a proposal and in June 1943 he and Goldstine secured funding from the Army for the project. The ENIAC was built in 30 months with 200,000 man hours, the ENIAC was huge, measuring 30 by 60 feet and weighing 30 tons with 18,000 vacuum tubes. The device could only store 20 numbers and took days to program and it was completed in late 1945 as World War II was coming to an end. In spite of disappointment that ENIAC had not contributed to the war effort, prior even to the ENIACs completion, the Army procured a second contract from the Moore School to build a successor machine known as the EDVAC. Goldstine, Mauchly, J. Presper Eckert and Arthur Burks began to study the development of the new machine in the hopes of correcting the deficiencies of the ENIAC. Unknown to Goldstine, Neumann was then working on the Manhattan Project, the calculations needed for this project were also daunting. As a result of his conversations with Goldstine, Neumann joined the study group, Neumann intended this to be a memo to the study group, but Goldstine typed it up into a 101-page document that named Neumann as the sole author

2.
Hilbert space
–
The mathematical concept of a Hilbert space, named after David Hilbert, generalizes the notion of Euclidean space. It extends the methods of algebra and calculus from the two-dimensional Euclidean plane. A Hilbert space is a vector space possessing the structure of an inner product that allows length. Furthermore, Hilbert spaces are complete, there are limits in the space to allow the techniques of calculus to be used. Hilbert spaces arise naturally and frequently in mathematics and physics, typically as infinite-dimensional function spaces, the earliest Hilbert spaces were studied from this point of view in the first decade of the 20th century by David Hilbert, Erhard Schmidt, and Frigyes Riesz. They are indispensable tools in the theories of partial differential equations, quantum mechanics, Fourier analysis —and ergodic theory, john von Neumann coined the term Hilbert space for the abstract concept that underlies many of these diverse applications. The success of Hilbert space methods ushered in a very fruitful era for functional analysis, geometric intuition plays an important role in many aspects of Hilbert space theory. Exact analogs of the Pythagorean theorem and parallelogram law hold in a Hilbert space, at a deeper level, perpendicular projection onto a subspace plays a significant role in optimization problems and other aspects of the theory. An element of a Hilbert space can be specified by its coordinates with respect to a set of coordinate axes. When that set of axes is countably infinite, this means that the Hilbert space can also usefully be thought of in terms of the space of sequences that are square-summable. The latter space is often in the literature referred to as the Hilbert space. One of the most familiar examples of a Hilbert space is the Euclidean space consisting of vectors, denoted by ℝ3. The dot product takes two vectors x and y, and produces a real number x·y, If x and y are represented in Cartesian coordinates, then the dot product is defined by ⋅ = x 1 y 1 + x 2 y 2 + x 3 y 3. The dot product satisfies the properties, It is symmetric in x and y, x · y = y · x. It is linear in its first argument, · y = ax1 · y + bx2 · y for any scalars a, b, and vectors x1, x2, and y. It is positive definite, for all x, x · x ≥0, with equality if. An operation on pairs of vectors that, like the dot product, a vector space equipped with such an inner product is known as a inner product space. Every finite-dimensional inner product space is also a Hilbert space, multivariable calculus in Euclidean space relies on the ability to compute limits, and to have useful criteria for concluding that limits exist

3.
Banach space
–
In mathematics, more specifically in functional analysis, a Banach space is a complete normed vector space. Banach spaces are named after the Polish mathematician Stefan Banach, who introduced this concept and studied it systematically in 1920–1922 along with Hans Hahn, Banach spaces originally grew out of the study of function spaces by Hilbert, Fréchet, and Riesz earlier in the century. Banach spaces play a role in functional analysis. In other areas of analysis, the spaces under study are often Banach spaces, the vector space structure allows one to relate the behavior of Cauchy sequences to that of converging series of vectors. All norms on a vector space are equivalent. Every finite-dimensional normed space over R or C is a Banach space, if X and Y are normed spaces over the same ground field K, the set of all continuous K-linear maps T, X → Y is denoted by B. In infinite-dimensional spaces, not all maps are continuous. For Y a Banach space, the space B is a Banach space with respect to this norm, if X is a Banach space, the space B = B forms a unital Banach algebra, the multiplication operation is given by the composition of linear maps. If X and Y are normed spaces, they are isomorphic normed spaces if there exists a linear bijection T, X → Y such that T, if one of the two spaces X or Y is complete then so is the other space. Two normed spaces X and Y are isometrically isomorphic if in addition, T is an isometry, the Banach–Mazur distance d between two isomorphic but not isometric spaces X and Y gives a measure of how much the two spaces X and Y differ. Every normed space X can be embedded in a Banach space. More precisely, there is a Banach space Y and an isometric mapping T, X → Y such that T is dense in Y. If Z is another Banach space such that there is an isomorphism from X onto a dense subset of Z. This Banach space Y is the completion of the normed space X, the underlying metric space for Y is the same as the metric completion of X, with the vector space operations extended from X to Y. The completion of X is often denoted by X ^, the cartesian product X × Y of two normed spaces is not canonically equipped with a norm. However, several equivalent norms are used, such as ∥ ∥1 = ∥ x ∥ + ∥ y ∥, ∥ ∥ ∞ = max. In this sense, the product X × Y is complete if and only if the two factors are complete. If M is a linear subspace of a normed space X, there is a natural norm on the quotient space X / M

4.
Stereotype space
–
In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics stereotype spaces are topological vector spaces defined by a special variant of reflexivity condition. Each pseudocomplete barreled space X is stereotype, a metrizable locally convex space X is stereotype if and only if X is complete. Each infinite dimensional normed space X considered with the X ⋆ -weak topology is not stereotype, there exist stereotype spaces which are not Mackey spaces. Some simple connections between the properties of a stereotype space X and those of its dual space X ⋆ are expressed in the following list of regularities, the first results on this type of reflexivity of topological vector spaces were obtained by M. F. Smith in 1952. Further investigations were conducted by B. S. Brudovskii, W. C, waterhouse, K. Brauner, S. S. Akbarov, and E. T. Shavgulidze. Each locally convex space X can be transformed into a space with the help of the standard operations of pseudocompletion and pseudosaturation defined by the following two propositions. If X is a locally convex space, then its pseudosaturation X △ is stereotype. Dually, if X is a locally convex space, then its pseudocompletion X ▽ is stereotype. For arbitrary locally convex space X the spaces X △ ▽ and X ▽ △ are stereotype and it defines two natural tensor products X ⊛ Y, = Hom ⋆, X ⊙ Y, = Hom. This condition is weaker than the existence of the Schauder basis, the following proposition holds, If two stereotype spaces X and Y have the stereotype approximation property, then the spaces Hom, X ⊛ Y and X ⊙ Y have the stereotype approximation property as well. In particular, if X has the approximation property, then the same is true for X ⋆. This allows to reduce the list of counterexamples in comparison with the Banach theory, the arising theory of stereotype algebras allows to simplify constructions in the duality theories for non-commutative groups. In particular, the group algebras in these theories become Hopf algebras in the algebraic sense. Schaefer, Helmuth H. Topological vector spaces, Robertson, A. P. Robertson, W. J. Topological vector spaces. The Pontrjagin duality theorem in linear spaces, on k- and c-reflexivity of locally convex vector spaces. Brauner, K. Duals of Fréchet spaces and a generalization of the Banach-Dieudonné theorem, Akbarov, S. S. Pontryagin duality in the theory of topological vector spaces and in topological algebra. Akbarov, S. S. Holomorphic functions of exponential type, envelopes and refinements in categories, with applications to functional analysis. On two classes of spaces reflexive in the sense of Pontryagin, Akbarov, S. S. Pontryagin duality and topological algebras

5.
Inner product space
–
In linear algebra, an inner product space is a vector space with an additional structure called an inner product. This additional structure associates each pair of vectors in the space with a quantity known as the inner product of the vectors. Inner products allow the introduction of intuitive geometrical notions such as the length of a vector or the angle between two vectors. They also provide the means of defining orthogonality between vectors, inner product spaces generalize Euclidean spaces to vector spaces of any dimension, and are studied in functional analysis. An inner product induces a associated norm, thus an inner product space is also a normed vector space. A complete space with a product is called a Hilbert space. An space with a product is called a pre-Hilbert space, since its completion with respect to the norm induced by the inner product is a Hilbert space. Inner product spaces over the field of numbers are sometimes referred to as unitary spaces. In this article, the field of scalars denoted F is either the field of real numbers R or the field of complex numbers C, formally, an inner product space is a vector space V over the field F together with an inner product, i. e. Some authors, especially in physics and matrix algebra, prefer to define the inner product, then the first argument becomes conjugate linear, rather than the second. In those disciplines we would write the product ⟨ x, y ⟩ as ⟨ y | x ⟩, respectively y † x. Here the kets and columns are identified with the vectors of V and this reverse order is now occasionally followed in the more abstract literature, taking ⟨ x, y ⟩ to be conjugate linear in x rather than y. A few instead find a ground by recognizing both ⟨ ⋅, ⋅ ⟩ and ⟨ ⋅ | ⋅ ⟩ as distinct notations differing only in which argument is conjugate linear. There are various reasons why it is necessary to restrict the basefield to R and C in the definition. Briefly, the basefield has to contain an ordered subfield in order for non-negativity to make sense, the basefield has to have additional structure, such as a distinguished automorphism. More generally any quadratically closed subfield of R or C will suffice for this purpose, however in these cases when it is a proper subfield even finite-dimensional inner product spaces will fail to be metrically complete. In contrast all finite-dimensional inner product spaces over R or C, such as used in quantum computation, are automatically metrically complete. In some cases we need to consider non-negative semi-definite sesquilinear forms and this means that ⟨ x, x ⟩ is only required to be non-negative

6.
Euclidean space
–
In geometry, Euclidean space encompasses the two-dimensional Euclidean plane, the three-dimensional space of Euclidean geometry, and certain other spaces. It is named after the Ancient Greek mathematician Euclid of Alexandria, the term Euclidean distinguishes these spaces from other types of spaces considered in modern geometry. Euclidean spaces also generalize to higher dimensions, classical Greek geometry defined the Euclidean plane and Euclidean three-dimensional space using certain postulates, while the other properties of these spaces were deduced as theorems. Geometric constructions are used to define rational numbers. It means that points of the space are specified with collections of real numbers and this approach brings the tools of algebra and calculus to bear on questions of geometry and has the advantage that it generalizes easily to Euclidean spaces of more than three dimensions. From the modern viewpoint, there is only one Euclidean space of each dimension. With Cartesian coordinates it is modelled by the coordinate space of the same dimension. In one dimension, this is the line, in two dimensions, it is the Cartesian plane, and in higher dimensions it is a coordinate space with three or more real number coordinates. One way to think of the Euclidean plane is as a set of points satisfying certain relationships, expressible in terms of distance, for example, there are two fundamental operations on the plane. One is translation, which means a shifting of the plane so that point is shifted in the same direction. The other is rotation about a point in the plane. In order to all of this mathematically precise, the theory must clearly define the notions of distance, angle, translation. Even when used in theories, Euclidean space is an abstraction detached from actual physical locations, specific reference frames, measurement instruments. The standard way to such space, as carried out in the remainder of this article, is to define the Euclidean plane as a two-dimensional real vector space equipped with an inner product. The reason for working with vector spaces instead of Rn is that it is often preferable to work in a coordinate-free manner. Once the Euclidean plane has been described in language, it is actually a simple matter to extend its concept to arbitrary dimensions. For the most part, the vocabulary, formulae, and calculations are not made any more difficult by the presence of more dimensions. Intuitively, the distinction says merely that there is no choice of where the origin should go in the space