Heuristic argument

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A heuristic argument is an argument that reasons from the value of a method or principle that has been shown by experimental (especially trial-and-error) investigation to be a useful aid in learning, discovery and problem-solving. A widely used and important example of a heuristic argument is Occam's Razor.

It is a speculative, non-rigorous argument, that relies on an analogy or on intuition, that allows one to achieve a result or approximation to be checked later with more rigor; otherwise the results are of doubt, it is used as a hypothesis or conjecture in an investigation. It can also be used as a mnemonic.[1]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Brodsky, Stanley J.; Ellis, John; Karliner, Marek (1988). "Chiral symmetry and the spin of the proton" (PDF). Physics Letters B. 206 (2): 309–315. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91511-0.