Media manipulation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Media manipulation is a series of related techniques in which partisans create an image or argument that favours their particular interests.[1] Such tactics may include the use of logical fallacies, psychological manipulations, outright deception, rhetorical and propaganda techniques, and often involve the suppression of information or points of view by crowding them out, by inducing other people or groups of people to stop listening to certain arguments, or by simply diverting attention elsewhere. In Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes, Jacques Ellul writes that public opinion can only express itself through channels which are provided by the mass media of communication – without which there could be no propaganda.[2] It is used within public relations, propaganda, marketing, etc. While the objective for each context is quite different, the broad techniques are often similar.

As illustrated below, many of the more modern mass media manipulation methods are types of distraction, on the assumption that the public has a limited attention span.

Contexts[edit]

Activism[edit]

Activism is the practice or doctrine that has an emphasis on direct vigorous action especially supporting or opposing one side of a controversial matter,[3] it is quite simply starting a movement to effect or change social views. It is frequently started by influential individuals but is done collectively through social movements with large masses,[4] these social movements can be done through public rallies, strikes, street marches and even rants on social media.

A large social movement that has changed public opinion through time would be the 'Civil Rights March on Washington', where Martin Luther King Jr. performed his 'I Have a Dream' speech attempting to change social views on Non-White Americans in the United States of Americ, 28 August 1963. Most of King's movements were done through non-violent rallies and public speeches to show the white American population that they were peaceful but also wanted change in their community; in 1964, the 'Civil Rights Acts' commenced giving Non-White Americans equality with all races.

Advertising[edit]

"Daisy", a TV commercial for the re-election of U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson. It aired only once, in September 1964, and is considered both one of the most controversial and one of the most effective political ads in U.S. history.

Advertising is the action of attracting public attention to something, especially through paid announcements for products and services,[5] this tends to be done by businesses who wish to sell their product by paying media outlets to show their products or services on television breaks, banners on websites and mobile applications.

These advertisements are not only done by businesses but can also be done by certain groups. Non-commercial advertisers are those who spend money on advertising in a hope to raise awareness for a cause or promote specific ideas,[6] these include groups such as interest groups, political parties, government organizations and religious movements. Most of these organizations intend to spread a message or sway public opinion instead of trying to sell products or services. Advertising can not only be found on social media, it is also evident on billboards, newspapers, magazines and even word of mouth.

advertising can be manipulated through photo-shopping. By doing this it will seem like the product on TV more appealing, this is done by highlighting certain features on the product and using certain editing tools to enlarge the photo, to attract you and persuade you to buy the product.

Hoaxing[edit]

A hoax is something intended to deceive or defraud. When a newspaper or the news reports a fake story, it is known as a hoax. Misleading public stunts, scientific frauds, false bomb threats and business scams as hoaxes.[7] A common aspect that hoaxes have is that they are all meant to deceive or lie, for something to become a hoax, the lie must have something more to offer. It must be outrageous, dramatic but also has to be believable and ingenious. Above all, it must be able to attract attention from the public. Once it has done that then a hoax is in full effect.

The word hoax became popular in the middle to late eighteenth century,[7] it is thought to have come from the saying 'hocus pocus'. Hocus pocus means meaningless talk which is typically designed to trick others or conceal the truth about a situation, it is thought to be derived from a conjuror in the time of King James who called himself 'The Kings Majesties most excellent Hocus Pocus', where he would perform a trick and call out a phrase beginning with "hocus pocus".

The key word in something becoming a hoax is "public". A lie or a deception only becomes a hoax when it is acknowledged by the public. A popular hoax that is evident in today's times would be the 'Microwave your spoon' hoax, this hoax originated from a video which shows a metallic spoon being heated inside a microwave oven. It then further on suggests that it is easier to eat ice cream when the spoon is first microwaved, this hoax has fooled many people on social media into believing that the spoon could be microwaved, only to find that their microwave was damaged. The point of this hoax was to show how gullible people can be on social media and to prove that not everything you read or see on the internet is true.

An example of a hoax was a fake viral video is one that happened in 2012. Greenpeace paid to have a video made by Yes Men and that Occupy Seattle posted on their website. The video then took off and a lot of companies and people shared it. The video was of a drink fountain that looked like an oil platform at a party for Shell malfunctioning, and getting all over the party. The video then shows the a man telling the person holding the phone camera to stop filming while they are rushed out the door. There were also fake legal messages sent out to make it look like Shell was threatening the people reporting the story, it was very widespread and believed by many.[8]

Propagandising[edit]

Propagandising is a form of communication that is aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position by presenting only one side of an argument. Propaganda is commonly created by governments, but some forms of mass communication created by other powerful organisations can be considered propaganda as well, as opposed to impartially providing information, propaganda, in its most basic sense, presents information primarily to influence an audience. Propaganda is usually repeated and dispersed over a wide variety of media in order to create the chosen result in audience attitudes. While the term propaganda has justifiably acquired a strongly negative connotation by association with its most manipulative and jingoistic examples (e.g. Nazi propaganda used to justify the Holocaust), propaganda in its original sense was neutral, and could refer to uses that were generally benign or innocuous, such as public health recommendations, signs encouraging citizens to participate in a census or election, or messages encouraging persons to report crimes to the police, among others.

Propaganda uses societal norms and myths that people hear and believe, because people respond to, understand and remember more simple ideas this is what is used to influence people's beliefs, attitudes and values.[9]

Psychological warfare[edit]

Psychological warfare is sometimes considered synonymous with propaganda, the principal distinction being that propaganda normally occurs within a nation, whereas psychological warfare normally takes place between nations, often during war or cold war. Various techniques are used to influence a target's values, beliefs, emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior. Target audiences can be governments, organizations, groups, and individuals.

This tactic has been used in multiple wars throughout history. During World War II, the western Allies, expect for the Soviet Union would drop leaflets on the US and England. During the conflict with Iraq, American and England dropped leaflets on them, many of the leaflets telling the people how to surrender. In the Korean War both sides would use loud speakers from the front lines.[10] In 2009 people in Israel in the Gaza warreceived text messages on their cell phones threatening them with rocketattacks. The Palestinian people were getting phone calls and leaflets warning them that they were going to drop rockets on them. These phone calls and leaflets were not always accurate.[11]

Public relations[edit]

Public relations (PR) is the management of the flow of information between an individual or an organization and the public. Public relations may include an organization or individual gaining exposure to their audiences using topics of public interest and news items that do not require direct payment. PR is generally created by specialised individuals or firms at the behest of already public individuals or organizations, as a way of managing their public profile.

Techniques[edit]

Astroturfing[edit]

Astroturfing is when there is an intent and attempt to create the illusion of support for a particular cause, person, or stance. While this is mainly connected to and seen on the internet, it has also happened in newspapers during times of political elections.[12] Corporations and political parties try to imitate grassroots movements in order to sway the public to believing something that isn't true.[13]

Clickbait[edit]

Clickbait refers to headlines of online news articles that are sensationalized or sometimes completely fake, it uses people's natural curiosity to get people to click. In some cases clickbait is simply used to generate income, more clicks means more money made with advertisers,[14] but these headlines and articles can also be used to influence a group of people on social media. They are constructed to appeal to the interest group's pre-existing biases and thus to be shared within filter bubbles.[15]

Distraction[edit]

Distraction by major events[edit]

Commonly known as "smoke screen", this technique consists of making the public focus its attention on a topic that is more convenient for the propagandist, this particular type of media manipulation has been referenced many times in popular culture. Some examples are:

  • The movie Wag the Dog (1997), which illustrates the public being deceitfully distracted from an important topic by presenting another that whose only quality is that of being more attractive.
  • In the U.S. TV series House of Cards, when protagonist Frank Underwood finds himself trapped in a media rampage, he addresses the viewer and says: "From the lion's den or a pack of wolves. When you're fresh meat, kill and throw them something fresher".

Politicians distract the public by showing them "shiny object" issues through the use of TV and other media. Sometimes they can be as simple as a politician with a reality show, like Sarah Palin had for a short time back in 2009, which aired on TLC.[16]

Distracting the public[edit]

This a mere variation of the traditional arguments known, in logic, as ad hominem and ad populum but applied to countries instead of individuals. This technique consists on refuting arguments by appealing to nationalism or by inspiring fear and hate towards a foreign country or to all the foreigners, it has the potential of being important since it gives the propagandists the power to discredit any information coming from other countries.

Some examples are:

Q: "What do you think about Khokara's politic on X matter?" A: "I think they've been wrong about everything for the last 20 years or so..."

Q: "Your idea is quite similar to the one proposed in Falala." A: "Are you suggesting Falala is a better country than ours?"

Straw man fallacy[edit]

An informal fallacy, the "straw man" consists on appearing to refute the opponent's argument while actually attacking another topic. For it to work properly the topic that was actually refuted and the one that should have been refuted need to be similar.

Distraction by scapegoat[edit]

This is a combination of the straw man fallacy and the ad hominem argument, it is often used to incriminate someone in order to argument the innocence of someone else.

This is a very important tactic for governments and politicians, and it even made its way to the famous book The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene, in the Law #26 titled: "Keep you hands clean".


Search engine marketing[edit]

In search engine marketing websites use market research, from past searches and other sources, to increase their visibility in search engine results pages, this allows them to guide search results along the lines they desire, and thereby influence searchers.[17][18]

Business have many tactics to lure customers into their websites and to generate revenue such as banner ads, search engine optimization and pay-per-click marketing tools, they all serve a different purpose and use different tools that appeal to multiple types of users. Banner ads appear on sites that then redirect to other sites that are similar. Search engine optimization is changing a page to seem more reliable or applicable than other similar pages. Pay-per-click involves certain words being highlighted because they were bought my advertisers to then redirect to a page containing information or selling whatever that word pertained to. By using the internet, users are susceptible to these type of advertisements without a clear advertising campaign being viewed.

Compliance professionals[edit]

A compliance professional is an expert that utilizes and perfects means of gaining media influence. Though the means of gaining influence are common, their aims vary from political, economic, to personal, thus the label of compliance professional applies to diverse groups of people, including propagandists, marketers, pollsters, salespeople and political advocates.

Techniques[edit]

Means of influence include, but are not limited to, the methods outlined in Influence: Science and Practice:

Additionally, techniques like framing and less formal means of effective obfuscation, such as the use of logical fallacies, are used to gain compliance.

See also[edit]

Related topics

Notable compliance experts

Notable media manipulation theorists

References[edit]

  1. ^ Coxall, Malcolm (2 Mar 2013). Caswell, Guy, ed. Human Manipulation - A Handbook. Cornelio Books. ISBN 978-8-4940-8532-1. 
  2. ^ Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes, Ch. 2.Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner. Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
  3. ^ "Definition of Activism". Merriam-Webster. 2015. 
  4. ^ "What is Activism". Permanent Culture Now. 2016. 
  5. ^ "What is Advertising". Study.com. 2016. 
  6. ^ "Non-commercial Advertising". Business Dictionary. 2015. 
  7. ^ a b "What is a Hoax". Hoaxipedia. 2016. 
  8. ^ "Forbes Welcome". www.forbes.com. Retrieved 2017-12-03. 
  9. ^ "Media's Use of Propaganda to Persuade People's Attitude, Beliefs and Behaviors". web.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2017-12-03. 
  10. ^ "psychological warfare". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2017-12-03. 
  11. ^ Jerusalem, Hazem Balousha Toni O'Loughlin in (2009-01-03). "Text messages and phone calls add psychological aspect to warfare in Gaza". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2017-12-03. 
  12. ^ Bienkov, Adam (2012-02-08). "Astroturfing: what is it and why does it matter? | Adam Bienkov". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2017-12-03. 
  13. ^ "10 Fake Grassroots Movements Started By Corporations To Sway Your Opinion". Business Insider. Retrieved 2017-12-03. 
  14. ^ Frampton, Ben (2015-09-14). "Is clickbait changing journalism?". BBC News. Retrieved 2017-12-03. 
  15. ^ https://www.facebook.com/aohlheiser. "Analysis | This is how Facebook's fake-news writers make money". Washington Post. Retrieved 2017-12-03. 
  16. ^ Leibovich, Mark (2015-09-01). "The Politics of Distraction". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-12-03. 
  17. ^ "What Is Search Engine Optimization / SEO". Youtube: Search Engine Land. Retrieved 26 July 2015. 
  18. ^ Ratliff, James; Rubinfeld, Daniel (May 2014). "Is There a Market for Organic Search Engine Results and Can Their Manipulation Give Rise to Antitrust Liability?". Journal of Competition Law and Economics: 1–25. 

Further reading[edit]

  • Beeston, R. (2001, September 12). Bin Laden Heads List of Suspects, Terror in America. Times.
  • Braddock J, (7 July 2009), Historian says US backed "efficious terror" in 1965 Indonesian Massacre, World Socialist Website.
  • Cialdini, Robert B., Influence: Science and Practice, 4th Edition, 2000. New Jersey: Allyn & Bacon.
  • E. Cashmore; E, McLaughlin, (1991). Out of Order: Policing Black People, Routledge.
  • Ewen, Stuart, Captains of Consciousness: Advertising and the Social Roots of the Consumer Culture, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
  • Ewen, Stuart, PR! A Social History of Spin, New York: Basic Books, 1996.
  • Ewen, Stuart and Ewen, Elizabeth, Channels of Desire: Mass Images and the Shaping of American Consciousness, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982.
  • Herman, Edward S. and Chomsky, Noam, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, New York: Pantheon Books, 1988.
  • Hodges, D. (2014, August 3). West Africans Are Streaming Across the U.S. Southern Border Carrying the Ebola Virus, the Common Sense Show.
  • J Bohannon, (27 May 2015). I Fooled Millions of People into Thinking Chocolate Helps Weight Loss, Here's How. IO9, Gizmodo, Debunkery.
  • Jamieson, H. K, (1992). Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
  • J Ostrow, (26 June 2012). Politics in Russia: A Reader. Sage Publications
  • Jowett, Garth S. and O'Donnell, Victoria, Propaganda and Persuasion, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1999. ISBN 0-7619-1147-2.
  • J Turner-Sadler, (2009). African American History: An Introduction. Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Kellner, D. (2006, August 15). 9/11, Spectacles of terror, and media manipulation. Miscellany.
  • Parenti M, (Spring 2002), Monopoly Media Manipulation, Mediterranean Quarterly
  • Peron, J. (2013, October 1). Are You Scared Yet? Huffington Post.
  • Lutz, William D., Doublespeak, New York, NY: HarperPerennial, 1990. ISBN 0-06-016134-5.
  • Rushkoff, Douglas, "They Say", in Coercion: Why We Listen to What "They" Say, New York: Riverhead Books, 1999.

External links[edit]