Socionics

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve it by replacing them with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent, third-party sources. (April 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) The examples and perspective in this article may not include all significant viewpoints. Please improve the article or discuss the issue. (February 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Part of a series of articles on
Socionics
Important works
Dual Nature of Man
Concepts
Information metabolism Information elements Intertype relationships Sociotypes Model-A
Important figures
Aušra Augustinavičiūtė Antoni Kępiński Carl Jung Ernst Kretschmer Pyotr Gannushkin Karl Leonhard Andrey Yevgenyevich Lichko
Socionic theorists
Alexander Bukalov Victor Gulenko Gregory Reinin
Socionic types
ILE • LII • ESE • SEI SLE • LSI • EIE • IEI LIE • ILI • SEE • ESI LSE • SLI • IEE • EII
Schools of thought
Informational Sociological Humanitarian Bio-psychological Linguistic
Psychology portal
v t e

Socionics, in psychology and sociology, is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche (called "Model A") and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions, in contrast to Jung's model, which used only four. These functions are supposed to process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.^[1][2]

Socionics was developed in the 1970s and 1980s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, psychologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science.^[3] The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because Augustinavičiūtė believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics.^[4][5][6]

The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions.^[7] Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.^[5][7][8]

In 1995 socionics was recognized as a discovery by the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences (not to be confused with Russian Academy of Sciences), and its creator Aušra Augustinavičiūtė was granted a certificate of discovery (diploma) and a medal.^[9][10]

Purpose[edit]

Socionics provides a means of predicting the character of relations and degree of business compatibility, information sharing and psychological compatibility of people before their joining in one collective group, i.e. to solve the "inverse task" of sociometry.^[11]

According to Aleksandr Bukalov and Betty Lou Leaver, socionics uses Jungian typology, informational model of psyche, and theory of information metabolism for political and sociological analysis.^[12][13]

According to G. Fink and B. Mayrhofer, socionics is considered one of the four most popular models of personality (including cybernetic theory Maruyama, five-factor model, Big Five" and typology Myers–Briggs Type Indicator), deserving special attention because of its importance in the study of personality.^[14]

According to J. Horwood, and A. Maw socionics is a science developed by Ausra Augustinaviciute in the 1970s. Augustinaviciute and her colleagues worked with Carl Jung's personality typologies to develop personality-based relationship profiles. It was found that the nature and development of interpersonal relationships (both professional and personal) are far from random. Instead, they are based on how well suited each individual's psychological profiles are to one another, allowing Augustinaviciute to develop 16 'socionic types' predicting and describing the interpersonal relationships between any combination of Jung's personality types.^[6]

According to R. Blutner and E. Hochnadel, "socionics is not so much a theory of personalities per se, but much more a theory of type relations providing an analysis of the relationships that arise as a consequence of the interaction of people with different personalities."^[15]

Philosopher L. Monastyrsky treats socionics as pre-science. At the same time, L. Monastyrsky himself proposes to pay attention to "the concept of socionic type".^[16]

Philosopher E. Pletuhina defines socionics as the study about the information interaction of the human psyche with the outside world, between people. She also defines it as the doctrine of psychological types of people and the relationships between them, as well as notes that the particular quality of socionics is that it considers the innate qualities of the human psyche, including the personality type, which cannot be arbitrarily changed without prejudice to the mental and physical health.^[17]

History[edit]

The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (December 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

The basic structure of socionics was established in the 1960s and 1970s by Aušra Augustinavičiūtė,^{[18][clarification needed]} along with a group of enthusiasts who met in Vilnius, Lithuania. What resulted from their discussions and Augustinavičiūtė's personal investigations was an information model of the psyche and of interpersonal interaction based on Jung's typology but with eight psychic functions rather than four.^[19] Augustinavičiūtė's first works on socionics^[15] were published between 1978 and 1980.

Relation to the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator[edit]

According to Betty Lou Leaver, Madeline Ehrman, and Boris Shekhtman, like the MBTI, socionics is a sixteen-type derivative of Jung's work. Unlike MBTI, which is widely criticized^[20] for the lack of validity and utility,^[21] the socionics model, which is in some use in Eastern and Western Europe, as well as throughout Eurasia, Central Asia, and the Baltic nations,^[22] strives to stay very close to the original descriptions and type labels suggested by Carl Jung.^[23] According to Betty Lou Leaver, "today's concepts of personality emanate most frequently from the work of Carl Jung, whose theories and research have blossomed into a juncture of philosophical and sociological inquiry. This field of inquiry has been called socionics."^[13]

According to Sergei Moshenkov and Tung Tang Wing, "MBTI and Socionics are contemporary sister sciences that categorize and describe human personality types in accordance to the predominance of certain mental faculties called psychic functions by Dr. Carl Jung."^[24]

A. Shmelev in his review of the book "MBTI: type definition" by I. Myers-Briggs and P. Myers notes the highest popularity of socionic books in Russian and remarks that their authors are appealing to the literary and artistic associations of the mass reader, in contradistinction to books on MBTI, which contain the empirical and statistical data on the types distribution in professional groups.^[25] S.A. Bogomaz considers the socionic typology as a version of post-Jung typology and believes that on a number of criteria it is more perspective than MBTI for the study of the differences between people, because it expands the volume of the typological features and offers an opportunity to form various typological groups with different motivations, attitudes, temperament, perception of information and thinking styles. It is also important the existence of preconditions to study intertype relations, that are substantially not developed within MBTI. S.A. Bogomaz thinks that the creation of the theory of intertype relationships is undoubtedly contribution of A.Augustinavichiute to the development of Jung typologies.^[26]

Current status[edit]

Currently, socionic methods are widely used in academic and applied research. According to the catalog DisserCat^[27] from 1996 to 2011 in Russia, Ukraine and other countries were defended more than 800 doctoral theses,^[28][29] using methods and analytic tools of socionics in management, education, psychology, anthropology, medicine, philosophy, philology, sports, and law.^[30]

The International Institute of Socionics publishes four scientific peer-reviewed journals on the practical application of the methods of socionics in management, consulting, psychology, pedagogy, education, psychotherapy, and humanities.^[31] The Institute gives "popularization and proliferation of socionic knowledge" as one of its goals.^[32]

Organizations[edit]

There are several socionics organizations. The International Institute of Socionics^[33][34] (IIS) was established in 1991 in Kiev, Ukraine, and for years has held the most prominent annual international socionics conference. The institute pursues the continued development of socionics theory, renders commercial consulting services, and since 1994 has released a bimonthly journal Socionics, Mentology, and Personality Psychology (six issues a year). Topics in the journal usually range anywhere from studies and applications of the primary principles of socionics to speculative extensions of the theory.^[35] The director and founder of the institute is Dr. Aleksandr Bukalov. In 2006 the institute established an International Academic Board to issue bachelors, masters, and PhD degrees in socionics.^[36]

The Scientific Research Socionics Institute is located in Moscow, Russia, and is led by Tatyana Prokofieva.^[37][38] The institute primarily studies socionics, personality and relationships within a socionics context, and develops methods of individual and business consulting.^[39] Furthermore, the institute provides socionics instruction allowing participants to receive a bachelors or master's degree in socionics according to the criteria of the International Institute of Socionics.^[40]

The Applied Socionics School^[41] founded in 2003 is located in Moscow, Russia, with local branches in several cities (Murmansk,^[42] Petrozavodsk,^[43] Rostov-na-Donu,^[44] and Krasnodar), and is led by Elena Udalova.^[45] The School developed educational courses about basic knowledge of socionics, the intertype relations, and sociotype distortions, as well as local trainings devoted to the introverted ethics and introverted intuition. The local trainings are conducted for persons of sociotypes having their strengths in respective functions (Fi or Ni, respectively).

The School of System Socionics^[46] was founded by Vladimir Davidovich Ermak in November 1991 in Kiev, Ukraine. In 2005 official School of System Socionics web site was founded by I. M. Eglit. Since then it has become creative laboratory of practical socionics and platform for training socionists—experts in TIM identification. The School has developed Methodology of remote TIM Identification, introduced a school-standard identification protocol and computer-aided type identification techniques.^{[citation needed]}

Socionics as an academic discipline[edit]

Through the work of the International Institute of Socionics and other schools of socionics, there are four peer-reviewed journals and an annual International conference on socionics.^[47] A.V. Bukalov and O.B. Karpenko note that socionics is taught in more than 150 universities^[30][48][49] in Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and other CIS countries, as well as in Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Romania, either as a separate course, or, in view of the applicability of the various methods of socionics Humanities, as part of educational courses on Sociology, Pedagogy, Social Psychology, Management and Psychology of Management, human resource management, Conflictology, social services and Tourism, Computer Science and Programming, Philosophy, Neurology, Journalism, Library Science, Social Work, Didactics and others, including Engineering disciplines.^[29][48][50]

Some universities in Russia (including Altai State Technical University,^[51] Bashkir State University,^[52][53] Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University,^[54] and Saint Petersburg State University^[55]) Ukraine,^[56] Bulgaria,^[57] Romania^[58] have published or commissioned a number of textbooks and monographs on socionics, or on psychology, pedagogy and management, which socionics and its methods are devoted to specific topics.

There are new areas of research, such as educational socionics,^[59][60] sociological socionics,^[61] aviation socionics,^[62][63] library socionics,^[64][65] technical socionics, linguistic socionics, penitentiary socionics, and socionics in other subject areas.

Socionics is used in education process, not only as a tool for teachers to manage the learning process,^[66] but also as a basis for the development and improvement of education and training.^[57] Bogdanova claim that a teacher holding socionic knowledge and technologies can consciously collaborate with others and improve professional efficiency.^[67] Targeted use of intertype relations helps intensify the didactic process, increase the motivation of students.^[68] Socionics is also used to assess the individual psychological and personal qualities to forecast the success of employee career.^[69]

Izmailova and Kiseleva found socionics interesting to be applied in advertising^[70] and marketing, because it allows you to explain the reasons for the behavior of consumers.^[71]

Socionics is a tool for the study of personality and creativity of the writer, the typology of the characters in his works.^[72] The method of linguistic-socionic modeling proposed by L. M. Komissarova,^[73] used for analysis of individual lexicon of language personality.^[74] A translation of socionic characteristics in verbal ones is called the "method of linguistic-socionic modeling" and widely used.^[75][76]

Socionic methods have been proposed for the modeling of information processes in the "human-machine" systems,^[77] and practically used to model systems "aircraft operator" in pilots' training,^[62] and other similar areas.

Due to the variety of applications of socionics, its concepts and information models, in the 1990s, Bukalov was proposed to distinguish socionics of personality, or differential socionics, and generalized, more abstract integral socionics.^[78] Bukalov believes that the concept of information metabolism, cybernetic modeling and general systems theory extends beyond of psychology and sociology, and consider the relationship of technical information devices, and the types of information human interactions as operator with various technical and electronic management systems of major industries, including chemical, nuclear power stations, complex computer complexes with adaptive tunable to a specific operator interfaces.^[78]

Propagation of socionics[edit]

In Ukraine, Russia, Belarus, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Georgia, Bulgaria, and Central Asia, socionics has grown significantly in popularity. A number of organizations which periodically hold conferences in Kiev, Moscow, St. Petersburg, and other cities.^{[citation needed]}

Socionics was first introduced in English in the mid-1990s when Sergei Ganin created Socionics.com. Since 1997, there is a resource of the International Institute of Socionics, Socionic.info. Dmitri Lytov, creator of the multi-language socionics resource, Socioniko.net, presented a more classical view of socionics and participated in online discussions in English. In 2006 Rick DeLong published hand translations of excerpts of several works by Augustinavičiūtė at Socionics.us, which clarified her views.^{[citation needed]}

International Institute of Socionics lists a number of academic publications on socionics in English in peer-reviewed journals.^[79] Since 2000 socionics as a scientific discipline and a field of research has been recognized in Russia and Ukraine.^[79][80][81] The 2015 academic research and applied work in the field of socionics was held in Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, Bulgaria, Great Britain, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Estonia, Austria, Germany, and others, as well as in the United States.^[79]

Practical applications[edit]

Socionists^[who?] have devised humanitarian, political, and information technologies that have been applied to various fields of human activity.^[82][83] Socionic techniques have been applied at more than 120 enterprises from Russia, Ukraine, Germany, and the Baltics by members of the International Institute of Socionics.^[83] Socionics is widely used in management, recruitment consultancy (professional orientation, team-compatibility, building company's strategy according to employees types), trainings of aviation and space crews, pedagogy (researches on interaction between teacher and students, problems of learning), family consultancy (marriage and divorce issues, age problems), fundamental science researches (mathematical modeling, genetics, psychophysics, morphology – external parameters of socionics types), psychology games and trainings.^{[84][85][86][87]}

Socionics technologies in management, staff recruitment and team building[edit]

Management is the area concerned with the application of both theoretical and practical socionics methods and S-technologies.^[88][89] Socionics methods and techniques were successfully implemented by the fellow consultants of International Institute of Socionics and their colleagues in management, reorganization, and team building in more than 150 firms, banks and companies in Germany, Latvia, Russia, Ukraine and other countries, included 30 enterprises of the Russian gas concern "Gazprom" in the North of Russia.^[11] Management of Deutsche Bank is using socionics methods to evaluate potential of its future employees.^[90]

Prof. J. Horwood and Prof. A. Maw socionics used to form the surgical ambulances^[6]

In recent decades interest to socionics tools in German, Russian, Ukrainian and other companies has grown dramatically.^{[citation needed]} Socinics model has been implemented in enterprises of the world's largest aluminium company Rusal for evaluating its employees.^[91] Different tools are used to define sociotypes, this involves observing and testing based on well-known test methods.^[92]

Numerous researches^[who?] dedicated to practical and theoretical socionics have proved its efficiency in forming collectives, particularly special and related to security systems. For example, experimental research of aircraft control services, which was conducted at St. Petersburg State University had shown that quality of interaction integral controller which was calculated on the basis of SMoIR (socionics model of intertype relationships) is correlated with sociometric data colour test relations.^[93] Also there are a number of scientific monographs and textbooks about significant role of socionics practices and methods in forming effective teams.

Authors of these works point out that modeling of situations in groups can be done in two ways: by forming small groups based on socionics structure (quadras, clubs and temperament types) or by analysis of intertype relations between team members. Choice of approach depends on the goals set. If a goal is to analyse a situation in the team and the interaction between its members, then the best choice is the intertype analysis between members^{[94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][clarification needed][103][104]}

Socionics methods are described in more than 110 PhD and doctoral dissertations in management, economics, organizational psychology.^[105]

Family socionics[edit]

Socionics allocates 16 types of the relations — from most attractive and comfortable up to disputed. The understanding of a nature of these relations helps to solve a number of problems of the interpersonal relations, including aspects of psychological and sexual compatibility. The researches of married couples by Aleksandr Bukalov, Olga Karpenko, and Galina Chykyrysova, have shown that the family relations submit to the laws, which are opened by socionics. The study of socionic type allocation in casually selected married couples confirmed the main rules of the theory of intertype relations in socionics.^[106][107] So, the dual relations (full addition) make 45% and the intraquadral relations make 64% of investigated couples.

Nuclear power plants' security[edit]

Security management of dangerous chemical or nuclear enterprises requires special methods of recruitment and work. To provide high security level on nuclear power plants by optimizing the human factor defined a number of ergonomic factors which have an influence on a person in a modern management system: the intensity of work, time factor, isolation of workplace that causes tight interpersonal contacts; monotony of work; lack of physical activity; negative external influences (noise, vibration, etc.).

Each of these factors and especially their combination leads to extreme modes and related stresses (not to mention other circumstances that faced operational staff of plants). However, those approaches are difficult to implement because of financial and timing loss. Except factors caused by external operational activity there are many social stressors as well.^{[citation needed]}

Social stressors may cause mistakes, but more often its provoking mistakes in situations, where they are the most likely to happen.^{[citation needed]} So, a person who doesn't have clear understanding of his duties, or somebody who takes his work as a dangerous activity, will commit more mistakes while working in short supply than a person who is not stressed by social factors. In order to reduce this kind of stressor, on some plants, for example on Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant were implemented testing, which were conducting communication trainings and other socionics methods.^[108] Also socionics approaches are taught in terms of courses training staff reserve on Leningrad nuclear power plant.^[109]

Socionics principles implemented to security system of nuclear power plants are described in a textbook.^[110] It includes analysis of the social structure of the staff, the concept of which coincides with the notion of psychoinformative space of collectives in integral socionics.^[111][112] Socionics tools combined with psycho informational theory of relationships are using to describe various models of human interaction with complex technological processes that take place in enterprises and transport.^[113]

Pedagogical socionics[edit]

The concepts and methods of socionics are widely used in pedagogy, this collaboration creates a new scientific branch – pedagogical socionics.^[114][115]

Pletuhina noted that the parent, trainer or teacher, who knows the theory of socionics, who also understands an idea of the "image of a socionics type" and who can determine the child's personality type with a sufficient degree of probability can use those opportunities of the individual approaches that socionics provides to raise and educate a child.^[17]

The role that socionics takes in the educational process is not limited to being a teacher's tool for the managing process.^[116] It is also a base for development and improving the educational system and for preparing staff. Teachers armed with socionics technology can consciously establish relationships with other people and increase efficiency of their pedagogical skills.^[117] Rational implementation of intertype relationships can push educational process to become more intensive and increase students' motivation.^[118][119]

Socionics is also researched practical methods and techniques dedicated to evaluation person's individual psychological values to prognoses professional success.^[120] Keneva, Marchenko, and Minaev argue that socionics might become a theoretical base for personal-oriented educational technologies.^[121][122]

Socionics in astronautics[edit]

In Yuri Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center which located in Star City, Russia socionics methods are successfully used since 1992 for training Russian astronauts and international astronauts' crews and preparing them to spaceflights.^{[citation needed]} Interpersonal issues and effective collaboration are extremely important in extreme conditions while working in a close space and are vital for successful spaceflight.^[123] In Star City conducted number of science seminars based on socionics methods and person typology to training space crews. Problem of forming space crews by socionics methods was a central topic at the International conference on space researches,^[124] at the Space forum 2011 and at the conference "Piloted flights into Space", which were taken place in Star City and in The Russian Academy of Sciences, also these issues were taken a part in works of Doctor of medical science professor Bohdashevsky, Doctor of philosophy Bukalov A.V. and Doctor of philosophy Karpenko O.B.^[125]

Aviation socionics[edit]

Socionics methods appeared helpful for aviation due to the safety of flights, passengers and crew members. This reasons leads to development of such branch as aviation socionics, which is a part of training process for crew members of aircraft.

According to order of the Ministry of transport of Russian Federation Flight Standards Department approved a default application "Training of pilots in the field of human factor", which expects basic socionics knowledge not only among pilots and other crew members, but also prognosing interaction in air crews by socionics methods, including such topics: "Topic 5. Aviation socionics and its place in solving human factor": sources of aviation socionics. The doctrine of Jung's personality type. A. Augustinavichiute and sources of socionics. Current status of socionics science. Sociotypes and its classification. Intertype interaction. Socionic components of professional characteristics. Topic 6. "The problem of forming flight crew and other aviation groups with high collaboration in it": The document, which regulate the formation flight crews. Socionics approaches in forming teams: quadras and typology of "non-quadral" teams. Forming teams in the concept of pursepoful systems. Topic 7. "Forming effective teams based on socionics model": Fuzzy sets: terms and definitions. Socionics model of human being. Socionics model of a crew member. Crew members as a collective operator. Socionics characteristic of crew members. Evaluation of effective collaboration. Conditions to reach synergism. Socionics prognosis in evaluation crew members. Socionics model of intertype interactions. Socionics model of crew members and its evaluation. Using socionics model of intertype interactions to form effective team. Topic 8. "Problems in evaluation relationships "human-machine" ": evaluation of interaction within system "pilot-aircraft". Criteria of interactions' evaluating. Socionics aspects of pilot-aircraft interaction. Preventing pilot's mistakes by constructive and technical tools"^[126]

There are numerous studies, dissertations^[127][128] and fundamental monographs in this field.^[129]

To improve interaction among crew members, specialists of Saint Petersburg University examined 2330 people by socionics methods, including students of St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation, Russian State Pedagogical University of A.I. Herzen, St. Petersburg State University of Culture and Arts; aircrews of airlines: "Syberia", "Atlant-Soyuz Airlines", "Ural Airlines", "Lukoylavia", "Gazpromavia", "Tomsk Avia", "Enimex" (Estonia), "Air Kazakhstan", "AZAL", "Kazair West", "RusAir" and others; air traffic controllers from Moscow, Khabarovsk, Rostov-on-Don, Novokuznetsk, Magadan, Norilsk, Saratov, Omsk, Kemerovo, New Urengoy, Syktyvkar, Nalchik, Ust-UTA, Kolpasevo, Pechora, Evenkii, Yakutia and Sakhalin; professors from almost all flight academies of Russia; delegates from Azerbaijan, Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, and Estonia.

This data base represents result of 10 years of scientific work. In their researches authors are relying on fundamental works of the Kyiv School of Socionics, International Institute of Socionics, publications in journals "Socionics, mentology and personal psychology", "Management and staff: management psychology, socionics and sociology".^[130]

Experimental researches of National Aviation University and Kropyvnytskyi Flight Academy of National Aviation University of Ukraine showed that sociometric and socionics approaches are playing a great role in the working process of aviation specialists, especially in forming flight crews and dispatcher changes.^{[citation needed]}

By system approach were defined socionic types of aviation professionals' personalities and level of their interaction of professional performing in small groups as an example of control changes.^{[citation needed]}

According to the experimental results were obtained socionics and sociometric data of air traffic controllers and correlation analyses of its parameters, also was determined the connection's intensity between person's interaction levels. The practical values of this research is to develop automated module to determine individual characteristic of operators and to evaluate the effectiveness of socionics in the management of air traffic, particular in special cases of flight^[131]

Jung's psychological types[edit]

Carl Jung describes four psychological functions that are capable of becoming applicable psychically, but to differing degrees in individuals:^[132]

• Sensation – all perceptions by means of the sense organs
• Intuition – perception by way of the unconscious, or perception of unconscious events
• Thinking (in socionics, Logic) – judgement of information based on reason
• Feeling (in socionics, Ethics) – judgement of information based on sentiment

In addition to these four types, Jung defines a polarity between introverted and extraverted personalities. This distinction is based on how people invest energy: either into the inner, subjective, psychical world (usually called Seele, soul, by Jung), or toward their outer, objective, physical world (including one's body).

By Jung's rules, 16 psychological types exist. But in his book "Psychological Types" he described in detail only 8, distinguished by the 8 possible dominant functions. Contrary to Socionics and MBTI, Jung did not conclude that the types had two introverted functions and two extroverted functions. He instead outlined that extroverted personality types had a Dominant extroverted function, an Auxiliary introverted function, and two Inferior introverted functions that are necessarily retarded.^[133]

Information metabolism elements[edit]

In socionics, Jung's cognitive functions are always either introverted (focused on refining quality) or extroverted (focused on increasing quantity), and are referred to as information metabolism elements (IM Elements).^[134] These are said to process information aspects. To understand what an information aspect is, it is necessary to understand information metabolism as Augustinavičiūtė understood it.

Augustinavičiūtė states that the human mind uses eight elements of information metabolism (mental functions) to perceive the world, and each of these eight elements reflect one particular aspect of objective reality.^[135] In her works she describes aspects of the world based on physical quantities such as potential and kinetic energy, space, time, and their properties.

Often, other socionists^[who?] have equated these information elements with their definition and according to fundamental physical concepts as well (Matter-Time-Energy-Space) (N. Medvedev,^[136] V. Ermak^[137]). Matter is compared to Thinking, Energy to Feeling, Space to Sensing, and Time to Intuition. Given the division of aspects of the absolute between Extroverted ("black") and Introverted ("white"), being four times two, their number is eight.^{[citation needed]}

The 8 socionics symbols ( ) were introduced by Augustinavičiūtė while working with Jung's typology^{[138][clarification needed]} and remain the dominant method of denoting the functions and the corresponding information aspects that they process. Text-based notation systems also enjoy use online, such as Victor Gulenko's 8 Latin letters ('P' for Pragmatism, 'E' for Emotions, 'F' for Force, 'I' for Ideas, 'L' for Laws, 'R' for Relation, 'S' for Senses, and 'T' for Time, correspondingly).^[139] Among western enthusiasts, Myers-Briggs notation (Te, Fe, Se, Ne, Ti, Fi, Si, and Ni, correspondingly) is also popular.^[140]

Element	Abstracted definition	Gulenko Name	Symbol	Description
Extroverted Logic	external dynamics of objects	Pragmatism		Pragmatism (P) is judgement of the efficiency of actions and technical processes, the prudence of a method or approach and how it will work practically. P is geared towards facts and assesses situations based on what happened, looking to convey information as accurately as possible, making communication dry and matter-of-fact. In this sense, it is the opposite of Emotions. P approaches systems in terms of how they can be improved, changing and adding to one's knowledge through empirical observation in order to increase functionality and profitability. In this sense, it is the inverse of Laws.
Extroverted Ethics	internal dynamics of objects	Emotions		Emotions (E) is judgement of the infectiousness of expressions and emotional states, the appeal of a message or image and how someone will react emotionally. E is geared towards feelings and assesses situations based on how people feel, looking to convey one's emotions as authentically as possible, making communication exaggerated and charged with passion. In this sense, E is the opposite of Pragmatism. E approaches people in terms of how they are made to feel, provoking and changing people's emotions through expressive actions in order to raise excitement and enthusiasm. In this sense, is the inverse of Relations.
Extroverted Sensation	external statics of objects	Force		Force (F) is perception of physical objects and the amount of space they take up in the real world, the impact something has on its environment and the threat it poses to other objects. F is geared towards action and decides immediately on quick assessments of superficial, concrete data, making the approach direct and imbued with a harsh determination. In this sense, it is the opposite of Ideas. F approaches reality in terms of the clash of opposing forces, winning over weaker opponents and looking to push a situation to their advantage, even if that requires an intense struggle. In this sense, it is the inverse of Senses.
Extroverted Intuition	internal statics of objects	Ideas		Ideas (I) is perception of abstract concepts and the amount of potential they could hold, the multiple alternatives to any proposition and their latent capabilities. I is geared towards speculation and likes to consider different possibilities, giving unorthodox perspectives a chance, making the approach indirect and roundabout in a whimsical way. In this sense, it is the opposite of Force. I approaches what is possible in terms of expanding its variety, opening new doors and wandering wherever curiosity points next, avoiding any kind of limitation. In this sense, it is the inverse of Time.
Introverted Logic	external statics of fields	Laws		Laws (L) is responsible for understanding logic and structure, categorizations, ordering and priorities, logical analysis and distinctions, logical explanations. L interprets information according to how it fits into a validating system. L is particularly aware of logical consistency and how concepts relate to each other in meaning and structure, independently of particular purposes.
Introverted Ethics	internal statics of fields	Relations		Relations (R) is responsible for understanding the quality, nature, and appropriate distance of personal relations; makes subjective judgments; and aspires to goodness of character. R has a strong understanding of a person's nature and intentions, one person's feelings towards another, their attitudes of like or dislike, and based on this information, how intimate or distant a relationship should be.
Introverted Sensation	external dynamics of fields	Senses		Senses (S) is responsible for detailed perception of physical sensations; questions of comfort, utility, and pleasure; and a sense of harmony and acclimation with one's environment (especially physical). S understands how well a person or thing's behavior agrees with its nature as well as the differences between comfortable behaviors and positions and uncomfortable ones.
Introverted Intuition	internal dynamics of fields	Time		Time (T) is responsible for the imagination of how things will develop over time, a sense of what is meaningful or transcendent and the understanding that some things are inevitable. T understands how causes in the past lead through to outcomes in the future. T is acutely aware of long-term trends and tendencies that are occur across any single present moment, and sees events as part of a continuous flow. T perceives the possible ramifications of future events and notices ties to the past.

The 16 types[edit]

Socionics divides people into 16 different types, called sociotypes. They are most commonly referred to by their two strongest functions, which in socionics are called the leading function (Jung's dominant) and the creative function (Jung's auxiliary). The creative function is opposite to the leading function in extraversion and rationality. For example, if the dominant function is introverted logic (a rational and introverted function), the secondary function must be irrational and extraverted, which means it must be either extraverted sensing or extraverted intuition.^{[citation needed]}

Aušra Augustinavičiūtė usually used names like sensory-logical introvert (SLI) to refer to the types. In SLI the leading function is introverted sensation and the creative function is extraverted logic. She also introduced the practice of referring to types by the name of a famous person of the type (although types of these persons are not universally agreed upon, with the old name Napoleon for the SEE being replaced by Caesar after being deemed an inaccurate type assignment). For example, she called the SLI Gabin and the SEI Dumas. Also sometimes names such as Craftsman or Mediator are used to express the social role of the type—a convention introduced by socionist Viktor Gulenko in 1995.^[141] Given the formal similarities present between Socionics and the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) abbreviations frequently used in English, some prefer to distinguish socionic type names from Myers–Briggs' names by writing the last letter (J or P) in lower case (for example, ENTp, ESFj)—a practice introduced by Sergei Ganin.^[142] This is because the relationship between socionics and Myers–Briggs and Keirseyan types is controversial.

Dmitri Lytov and Marianna Lytova state that "main spheres of application of socionics are almost the same as for the Myers–Briggs Type Theory", and that observed differences in correlation "represent characteristic stereotypes of the socionics and the Keirsey typology.^[143] Others state that MBTI and socionics "correlate in roughly 30% of cases," and that "there are many subtle differences".^{[144][clarification needed]} J and P in Socionics and Myers–Briggs are completely different:^[145] in Myers–Briggs, J and P stands for the first extraverted function (J—extraverted thinking or feeling, P—extraverted sensing or intuition); in Socionics, J and P stands for the first function (J—rational (thinking and feeling), P—irrational (sensing and intuition)). This formal conversion is carried out in accordance with the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator.

In dividing the socion according to the four Jungian dichotomies, from this is formed 16 socionic types. The following tables provide a list of types with the names most commonly used in socionics:

4-letter type acronym (socionics)	Four functions (Jung[146])	Model A	Two functions (socionics)	Formal name	Type alias	Social role
ESTj		P1 S2 E3 T4 R5 I6 L7 F8		Logical Sensory Extravert (LSE)	Stierlitz	Administrator / Director
ENTj		P1 T2 E3 S4 R5 F6 L7 I8		Logical Intuitive Extravert (LIE)	Jack London	Enterpriser / Pioneer
ESFj		E1 S2 P3 T4 L5 I6 R7 F8		Ethical Sensory Extravert (ESE)	Hugo	Bonvivant / Enthusiast
ENFj		E1 T2 P3 S4 L5 F6 R7 I8		Ethical Intuitive Extravert (EIE)	Hamlet	Mentor / Actor
ESTp		F1 L2 I3 R4 T5 E6 S7 P8		Sensory Logical Extravert (SLE)	Zhukov	Legionnaire / Conqueror
ESFp		F1 R2 I3 L4 T5 P6 S7 E8		Sensory Ethical Extravert (SEE)	Napoleon	Politician / Ambassador
ENTp		I1 L2 F3 R4 S5 E6 T7 P8		Intuitive Logical Extravert (ILE)	Don Quixote	Seeker / Inventor
ENFp		I1 R2 F3 L4 S5 P6 T7 E8		Intuitive Ethical Extravert (IEE)	Huxley	Psychologist / Reporter
ISTp		S1 P2 T3 E4 I5 R6 F7 L8		Sensory Logical Introvert (SLI)	Gabin	Craftsman / Mechanic
INTp		T1 P2 S3 E4 F5 R6 I7 L8		Intuitive Logical Introvert (ILI)	Balzac	Critic / Mastermind
ISFp		S1 E2 T3 P4 I5 L6 F7 R8		Sensory Ethical Introvert (SEI)	Dumas	Mediator / Peacemaker
INFp		T2 E2 S3 P4 F5 L6 I7 R8		Intuitive Ethical Introvert (IEI)	Yesenin	Lyricist / Romantic
ISTj		L1 F2 R3 I4 E5 T6 P7 S8		Logical Sensory Introvert (LSI)	Maxim Gorky	Inspector / Pragmatist
ISFj		R1 F2 L3 I4 P5 T6 E7 S8		Ethical Sensory Introvert (ESI)	Dreiser	Guardian / Conservator
INTj		L1 I2 R3 F4 E5 S6 P7 T8		Logical Intuitive Introvert (LII)	Robespierre	Analyst / Scientist
INFj		R1 I2 L3 F4 P5 S6 E7 T8		Ethical Intuitive Introvert (EII)	Dostoyevsky	Humanist / Empath

Among socionists^[who?], the prevailing view is that sociotypes are inborn and genetically determined,^[147] although the content of different functions and dimensions may vary. Some socionists^[who?] believe that sociotypes may temporarily change while in altered states of consciousness or under great stress.^{[citation needed]}

Vladimir Ermak first introduced two important concepts of modern socionics further confirmed by Elena Udalova research.^{[citation needed]} The first one is the growth dynamics which means that every horizontal block of two functions (see below) is filling in the certain age, from bottom to top, with the roughly 7-year interval, so that the lowest block is done before 7, the next is complete before 14, the weak part of the mental track is done before 21, and the top block finally leads after that. Due to this process, a child, or a teenager, may demonstrate faces of other sociotypes according to the active horizontal block. Besides, being introduced to the unknown people, or in stressful situations, people again may demonstrate adaptive or protective behaviour directed by the appropriate blocks (see below).^{[citation needed]}

The second concept is so called functional dimensions. It was introduced by Aleksandr Bukalov.^[148] He defined the first dimension as the personal experience (Ex), the second dimension as social norms (Nr), the third dimension as the current situation (St), and the fourth dimension as the globality, or time perspective (Tm). This concept is useful because it best illustrates the difference in cognitive power (imagine measuring capability of 2D v. 3D measuring tool) and roughly describes abilities of each function to process and generate information. Still, definitions of dimensions require further research and clarification. For example, the vulnerable function tends to lose knowledge which haven't been used.

Mathematics[edit]

Socionics, being Base-16, can be used with bitwise operations after Base-2 reduction

Relation	Base 16	Base 10	Base 2	Type
Ident.	0	0	0000	ENTp
Quas.	1	1	0001	ENTj
Cong.	2	2	0010	ENFp
Requ.	3	3	0011	ENFj
Coop.	4	4	0100	ESTp
Requ.	5	5	0101	ESTj
Sego.	6	6	0110	ESFp
Actv.	7	7	0111	ESFj
Extn.	8	8	1000	INTp
Mirr.	9	9	1001	INTj
Mira.	A	10	1010	INFp
Supr.	B	11	1011	INFj
Semi.	C	12	1100	ISTp
Supr.	D	13	1101	ISTj
Dual.	E	14	1110	ISFp
Conf.	F	15	1111	ISFj

Since socionics is mathematically Base-16 and also a psychology of personality in the same way as the typology of Carl Jung and Myers–Briggs, it shares a similar degree of mathematical consistency, while enduring the same serious shortcomings in the experimental justification of these theories.^{[citation needed]}

Taking this, socionics also differs from other typologies in that it also includes a complementary Base-16 relationship set, with the intent of penning to paper the key social dynamic traits between grouped combinations of socionic types. Therefore, socionics could be considered to be within the realm of the science of social dynamics, intended to describe social behavior according to mathematical applications of Base-16, group theory, set logic, and reduction of the Gulenko-Jungian notation for socionics types to hexadecimal and Base-2 bitwise operation. While this mathematical approach is strictly theoretical and has been criticized for lack of empirical testing,^[149] systems theory has been the tool of socionics theorist, such as Gregory Reinin to derive theorical dichotomies within socionics theory. In 1985 Aušra Augustinavičiūtė acknowledged the mathematical theories of Reinin and wrote a book titled The Theory of Reinin's Traits to describe the mathematical processes of socionics theory. Mathematical methods have been a standard part of socionics theory since this time.

Studies of Elena Udalova show that at least three of Reinin's Traits are distinguishable and can be used for detection of a sociotype.^{[citation needed]} Those include: statics/dynamics (having appropriate functions in their mental track), questims/declatims (tending to raise questions or declare opinions), and aristocrats/democrats (understanding inequality or equality of people). Not all names of Reinin's Traits reflect their actual meaning very well, but they were defined historically and now seem to be fixed.^{[citation needed]}

The methodology of deriving socionic relationships from two socionic types is similar to the enumeration of 16 possible boolean algebraic functions from two binary output and input variable types, with truth tables and during construction of logic gates in electronics.^[150]

Model A[edit]

Aušra Augustinavičiūtė developed a model of personality called Model A, which includes eight functional positions.^[151] Every human has every function, and can perceive and process any available information aspect by them; however, depending on where the metabolizing function for an aspect is located in a type's functional ordering, the actual quality of the produced information and the means of its use may vary.^{[citation needed]} The following diagram is an example of the positions of the functions in Model A (numbers of functions are in Viktor Gulenko's notation). The numbering of the functions is semi-arbitrary, and is intended to represent on the one hand the smooth flow of information from function 1 to 4 (the so-called "mental" track), and the mirroring of that flow by the other four. (the so-called "vital" track)

For example, the ILE type has the following version of Model A:

(I) (L) (R) (F) (E) (S) (T) (P)

1 2 4 3 6 5 7 8

Nature of functional positions[edit]

• Function 1 – leading, program, primary, base, or dominant function. This is the strongest conscious function, and the most utilized function of the psyche. A person's outlook and role in life is largely determined by the nature of this function. One is generally very confident in the use of this function, and may defend it when challenged. According to Bukalov, this is 4D function (Ex, No, Si, Ti).^{[citation needed]}
• Function 2 – creative or secondary function, is second in influence only to the dominant function. It assists the dominant function in achieving its essence. One is generally less confident with the use of this function than with his dominant function. As a result, the creative function is sometimes less instrumental when a person is challenged or threatened, or when dealing with new and complex tasks and data. According to Bukalov, this function is 3D (Ex, No, Si), or time invariant, because it produces something new which may never exist before.^{[citation needed]}
• Function 3 – role function, is a weak but conscious function. One generally tries to be at least adequate in areas where use of the role function is necessary. Moreover, one generally uses it in situations of social adaptation (e.g. introducing themselves to an unknown person). However, generally one has very little control or confidence over the role function, and criticism is painfully acknowledged with respect to it. Tactful assistance is required from someone else's strong function to overcome the problems associated with the role function. According to Bukalov, this function is 2D (Ex, No), or situation invariant, because it cannot adapt to the unusual situation beyond social norms.
• Function 4 – the vulnerable function, or place of least resistance, is a weak and conscious function, in addition to being the weakest function of the psyche. One painfully perceives his complete inability to use this function, and reacts negatively to its imposition upon him. Tactful assistance is required from someone else's strong function (preferably the Function 8) to overcome the problems associated with this function. According to Bukalov, this function is single dimensional, i.e. only personal experience is collected here, and it cannot be adapted even to the social norms.^{[citation needed]}
• Function 5 – suggestive function, or dual-seeking function, is a weak and unconscious function which is largely lacked. One requires assistance from somebody confident in this function in order to overcome the difficulties it presents. When left to one's own devices, the suggestive function goes unnoticed. According to Bukalov, this function is single dimensional, too, and one must be careful not to become subject of manipulation because of misuse of this function. Discussing aspects of this function makes person happy and trustful. (That's why it's called suggestive.)
• Function 6 – mobilizing function. This is a weak and unconscious function which one often understands poorly. Nonetheless, this function has a strong influence over one's actions. Individuals requires assistance from someone who uses it confidently in order to understand it. Often an individual is only aware that they are totally unaware of how to use this function. At the same time, it's 2D function, so it's capable of collecting a number of easy receipts for daily needs. Being successful in aspects of this function makes one happy and motivated. (That's why it's called mobilizing.)
• Function 7 – observant, or ignoring, or restricting function, the function of personal knowledge. This is a strong (3D according to Bukalov) but unconscious function. One generally has a good grasp of this function, but attempts to limit its use considerably. Individuals will disregard this function when an argument calls for restraint or when it will be difficult to indulge in its essence. At the same time one uses this function to restrict somebody's intervention to their privacy or territory, or other unsolicited interaction.^{[citation needed]}
• Function 8 – demonstrative or background function. This function is so deeply rooted into the psyche that one is usually not consciously aware of its existence or utilization. It is as strong as the leading function (4D according to Bukalov) and it tends to act silently to protect the weakest point of the dual person (see below). It can sound in situations of extreme irritation when the restricting function fails to break the unsolicited influence.^{[citation needed]}

Note that Model A provides the justification for the type names. The socionic name is leading-creative-extra/introversion. For example, the ILE is intuitive leading with a logical creative function and is extroverted. The ESI has leading ethics with secondary sensing and is introverted.

Blocks of the psyche[edit]

According to Augustinavičiūtė, the functions are paired in four blocks: the ego block, the super-ego block, the id block, and the super-id block. The ego block contains the leading (1) and creative (2) functions, the super-ego block contains the role (3) and vulnerable (4) functions, the super-id block contains the suggestive (5) and mobilizing (6) functions, while the id block contains the observant (7) and demonstrative (8) functions.^{[citation needed]}

The functions within the ego and super-ego blocks are said to be conscious (or "mental") functions, while those within the id and super-id blocks are said to be unconscious (or "vital"). The functions residing within the ego and id blocks are strong functions which are used naturally and well, while the functions of the super-ego and super-id blocks are weak functions and are used with difficulty. (In addition, using super-ego functions is stressful.)^{[citation needed]}

1 2 4 3 6 5 7 8

ego super-ego super-id id

strong weak weak strong

The 16 types in Model A[edit]

ILE	SEI	ESE	LII	EIE	LSI	SLE	IEI
SEE	ILI	LIE	ESI	LSE	EII	IEE	SLI

Intertype relations[edit]

Socionics postulates that the way information is communicated between different types results in different interaction styles, called intertype relations.^{[citation needed]} Each intertype relation has its bad and good qualities, though duality is generally considered to be the most psychologically comfortable as a long-term relationship. In total there are 16 relationship roles for each type (14 when not counting the split roles in the supervision and benefit relationship). All relations beside Request and Supervision are symmetric. Request and Supervision relations are asymmetric and have 2 roles: Request - Requester and Request recipient, Supervision - Supervisor and Supervisee. Each cell in the table shows who the type in the left column is to the type in the top row.

Table of intertype relations

	ILE	SEI	ESE	LII	EIE	LSI	SLE	IEI	SEE	ILI	LIE	ESI	LSE	EII	IEE	SLI
ILE	Id	Du	Ac	Mr	Rq+	Sv+	Cp	Mg	Se	Ex	QI	Cf	Rq-	Sv-	Cg	Sd
SEI	Du	Id	Mr	Ac	Sv+	Rq+	Mg	Cp	Ex	Se	Cf	QI	Sv-	Rq-	Sd	Cg
ESE	Ac	Mr	Id	Du	Cg	Sd	Rq-	Sv-	QI	Cf	Se	Ex	Cp	Mg	Rq+	Sv+
LII	Mr	Ac	Du	Id	Sd	Cg	Sv-	Rq-	Cf	QI	Ex	Se	Mg	Cp	Sv+	Rq+
EIE	Rq-	Sv-	Cg	Sd	Id	Du	Ac	Mr	Rq+	Sv+	Cp	Mg	Se	Ex	QI	Cf
LSI	Sv-	Rq-	Sd	Cg	Du	Id	Mr	Ac	Sv+	Rq+	Mg	Cp	Ex	Se	Cf	QI
SLE	Cp	Mg	Rq+	Sv+	Ac	Mr	Id	Du	Cg	Sd	Rq-	Sv-	QI	Cf	Se	Ex
IEI	Mg	Cp	Sv+	Rq+	Mr	Ac	Du	Id	Sd	Cg	Sv-	Rq-	Cf	QI	Ex	Se
SEE	Se	Ex	QI	Cf	Rq-	Sv-	Cg	Sd	Id	Du	Ac	Mr	Rq+	Sv+	Cp	Mg
ILI	Ex	Se	Cf	QI	Sv-	Rq-	Sd	Cg	Du	Id	Mr	Ac	Sv+	Rq+	Mg	Cp
LIE	QI	Cf	Se	Ex	Cp	Mg	Rq+	Sv+	Ac	Mr	Id	Du	Cg	Sd	Rq-	Sv-
ESI	Cf	QI	Ex	Se	Mg	Cp	Sv+	Rq+	Mr	Ac	Du	Id	Sd	Cg	Sv-	Rq-
LSE	Rq+	Sv+	Cp	Mg	Se	Ex	QI	Cf	Rq-	Sv-	Cg	Sd	Id	Du	Ac	Mr
EII	Sv+	Rq+	Mg	Cp	Ex	Se	Cf	QI	Sv-	Rq-	Sd	Cg	Du	Id	Mr	Ac
IEE	Cg	Sd	Rq-	Sv-	QI	Cf	Se	Ex	Cp	Mg	Rq+	Sv+	Ac	Mr	Id	Du
SLI	Sd	Cg	Sv-	Rq-	Cf	QI	Ex	Se	Mg	Cp	Sv+	Rq+	Mr	Ac	Du	Id

Key: Du - Duality; Ac - Activation; Sd - Semi-duality; Mg - Mirage; Mr - Mirror; Id - Identity; Cp - Cooperation; Cg - Congenerity; QI - Quasi-Identity; Ex - Extinguishment; Se - Super-ego; Cf - Conflict; Rq+ - Requester; Rq- - Request recipient; Sv+ - Supervisor; Sv- - Supervisee

Duality[edit]

Duality is a fundamental concept in Socionics.^{[citation needed]} Dual relations are characterized by mutual benefit and support, and are generally viewed as optimal for friendship, intimacy, and marriage (though sociotype is not the only factor influencing this).^{[citation needed]} The eight dual pairs are as follows:

LSE		—		EII
LIE		—		ESI
ESE		—		LII
EIE		—		LSI
SLE		—		IEI
SEE		—		ILI
ILE		—		SEI
IEE		—		SLI

In dual relations, the leading function of one partner is the suggestive function of the other, and the creative function of one partner is the mobilizing function of the other. Thus, the ego functions (the strongest and most socialized) of each correspond to the super-id functions of the other (the area where the person needs and expects assistance). Likewise, the super-ego block of one corresponds to the id of the other. In this relation, just 1 of 4 Jungian dichotomies is shared—rationality/irrationality. Duality interaction is generally rewarding and satisfying for both parties, providing inspiration and support. Duality is a central theme of the philosophy of socionics study: Augusta often stated her position that a person who is estranged from contact with a dual partner must cope by unnaturally distorting their personality, a phenomenon called "type masking". Relationships with conflictor types are cited as particularly troublesome: it is not uncommon for a person in a close relationship with their conflictor to develop an acute neurotic condition.^{[citation needed]}

The duality system is demonstrated in the following diagram, which details function relationships between two duals, an ILE and an SEI:

Activation[edit]

Activation relations occur between two members of the same quadra who share either introversion or extraversion. This relations can resemble duality since the super-id functions are both present in the ego functions of the other partner. However, these relations are somewhat less fulfilling than dual relations. Each partner's dominant function is the others mobilizing function. Activation relationships are often romantic if both partners find each other attractive. These relationships are often very easy to start, as both partners share either extraversion or introversion. Introvert activation relationships appear reserved, while extravert activation relationships appear hectic.^{[citation needed]}

Semi-duality[edit]

Relations of semi-duality are similar to relations of duality. Semi-duality occurs between partners who lead (by leading function) each other's dual-seeking (5th) functions but lack each other's creative functions (to assist their mobilizing functions). As a result, both partners often perceive elements of duality from the relationship but feel the other partner is misplacing the correct emphasis; as semi-duals will be able to help their partners with their dual seeking functions but both have the least confidence in the same area of the psyche (thinking, feeling, sensing, or intuition).^{[citation needed]}

Relationships of semi-duality can become very close for moderate periods of time until correspondence is broken indefinitely. These relationships often begin, or rekindle because of mutual interests or friends held in common.

Mirage[edit]

Mirage relations occur between partners whose creative functions are the other partners' mobilizing functions, but whose dual seeking (5th) functions are the other partners' role functions.^{[citation needed]}

Relationships of mirage often become quite close and are easy to begin because both individuals are able to communicate effectively with one another because partners share a preference for thinking, feeling, sensing, or intuiting.^{[citation needed]}

Mirror[edit]

Mirror relations occur between types who share the same ego functions, yet place different emphases on them; the dominant function of one partner is the creative function of the other. Mirror relations are characterized by similar actions and motivations between partners, and mutual understanding. Interactions usually result in a drawn out dialogue, as each partner seems to keep opening up avenues of thought which the other needs to now clarify verbally.^{[citation needed]}

An important source of dissension between mirror types is the opposing between Ej and Ip, or between Ep and Ij. Ejs find the passive, unstable Ip behavior to be a severe hindrance in getting things done, while Ips find the restless and proactive actions of Ej types paranoid and stifling. Similarly, Ep types find Ij types to be somewhat dull and boring, while Ij types see Ep types as wildly unpredictable and impetuous.

Identity[edit]

Relations of Identity describe relations between two individuals of the same type. Often, both partners will have similar perceptions of situations and problems, and will take similar actions. Partners usually understand the motivations behind the other's actions. A relationship between identity partners is characterized by mutual understanding, self-development, and learning. Each is interested in the other's ideas, and sees their value. For some types, though, such relations can soon become depleted and uninteresting, once informational potentials have been reached; since, broadly, there seems to be nothing more to discuss.^{[citation needed]}

Cooperation[edit]

Cooperation relations occur between partners who have the same creative function but differing dominant functions. As a result, partners may often perform similar activities or have similar fields of interest, but often do not understand each other's internal motivations. Partners will often approach their related fields with vastly different agendas and will generate conflict when working as a team. These relations become formal and business like as to avoid open debate and conflict.^{[citation needed]}

Kindred[edit]

Kindred relations (also called comparative relations) occur between types who share the same dominant function but possess different creative functions. Partners often see each other as interesting people and are often able to see each other's motivations, but tailor their actions towards areas where the other partner is unskilled or uninterested, as the creative function for one partner is the place of least resistance of the other.^{[citation needed]}

Kindred relationships are often similar to mirror relationships where ideas are communicated through drawn out dialog. These relationships are easy to begin because both partners share a similar type of intelligence, and are able to communicate it easily to one another.

Quasi-identity[edit]

Relations of Quasi-identity are characterized by mutual misunderstanding. One partner's ego functions are the other partner's demonstrative and observant functions. As quasi-identicals have opposite functions, they will often have similar interests (id block and ego blocks contain the same functions) and become involved in similar activities, but they rarely understand each other's motivations or ideas.^{[citation needed]}

Quasi-Identity partners often identify themselves as being very different from the partner.^{[citation needed]} Outside observers often have trouble seeing the differences that the individual sees between themselves and the partner. At the same time, Quasi-Identity relations are most productive to assess a new idea and find its weak points since quasi-identicals have an expert view from the other side.

Extinguishment[edit]

Extinguishment relations occur between types confident in the same area of the psyche but who place different emphases on each function. These relations often consist of similar lifestyles but differing thought processes. Partners will have similar interests and areas of expertise, and have little trouble communicating with one another.^{[citation needed]}

Still, misunderstanding and conflict arise when partners come to vastly different conclusions about specific ideas or events.

Super-ego[edit]

Super-ego relations occur between types whose ego functions are the other partners' super-ego functions. Super-ego relations are generally characterized by differing values, discomfort, and mutual misunderstanding.^{[citation needed]}

Partners in a super-ego relationship are often fascinated or terrified by their partners lack of similarity to themselves. Super-ego partners are constantly aware of their total opposition in values to the partner. Outside observers are often similarly aware.^{[citation needed]}

Conflict[edit]

Relations of Conflict are, unsurprisingly, characterized by constantly escalating conflict. Conflictors are the types with the most dissimilar values, and they rarely understand anything regarding each other's motivations or lifestyles. Conflictors may take for granted as truths what their partners may dismiss as absurd. Sometimes they understand each other so little that the conflict itself is not well understood, yet it prevails under the surface, discomfiting both partners to no end. Conflictors also are of opposite temperaments, which is a source of irritation to both partners. Conflictors are usually rather interesting for each other, but also very tiresome.^{[citation needed]}

Request[edit]

Relations of request are asymmetrical relations; one type requests another. The request recipient's dual seeking function is the requester's creative function, and as a result the request recipient often takes an interest in the requester. However, the requester's dual seeking function is the request recipient's place of least resistance, and the requester finds the request recipient a highly uninteresting person. Relations of request frequently end with the departure of the requester.^{[citation needed]}

Supervision[edit]

Relations of supervision are asymmetrical; one type supervises another. Relations of supervision are characterized by the supervisor's attempt to introduce his base function into the supervisee's life. The supervisor often perceives the supervisee as an interesting person and understands the supervisee's lifestyle, since the supervisor's creative function is the supervisee's base function. Nonetheless, the supervisee is often on the defensive since the supervisor's base function is the supervisee's point of least resistance (the function most vulnerable to criticism). The supervisee often perceives the supervisor to be the evil incarnate, while the bewildered supervisor wonders why the supervisee reacts so poorly to his objective and benevolent assistance.^{[citation needed]}

Groups of types[edit]

Quadras[edit]

A quadra is a group of four types in which only identity, dual, activity, and mirror relations occur. Quadras are distinguished by offering the greatest degree of psychological comfort among all groups containing four types. The feeling of comfort and harmony produced by the quadra is due to the fact that all types in the quadra seek to give expression to the shared set of information elements in their ego and super-id blocks and to de-emphasize the information elements in their super-ego and id blocks.^{[citation needed]}

Similar to the harmony of types within the same quadra, opposing forces also exist. If one were to put the four quadras in a circle, alpha-beta-gamma-delta, the two quadras facing each other would be opposing quadras and consist entirely of quasi-identical, conflictor, super-ego, and extinguishment relations. A person surrounded by people of the opposing type will often feel uneasy and out of place, due to the fact that all the people around them either lead with or seek for their weakest function. That type of interaction is often the basis for inherent misunderstandings between seemingly similar people (as in the case of the quasi-identical) or two people who seem to offend each other at every turn (often found in conflicting relations).^{[citation needed]}

The Quadras

1 Alpha	2 Beta	3 Gamma	4 Delta
ILE (ENTp) SEI (ISFp) ESE (ESFj) LII (INTj)	EIE (ENFj) LSI (ISTj) SLE (ESTp) IEI (INFp)	SEE (ESFp) ILI (INTp) LIE (ENTj) ESI (ISFj)	LSE (ESTj) EII (INFj) IEE (ENFp) SLI (ISTp)

Clubs[edit]

Clubs are groups that reflect spheres of activity.^{[citation needed]} There are 4 clubs, each with 4 types:

• Pragmatists (ST): ESTp, ESTj, ISTp, ISTj; or SLE, LSE, SLI, LSI
• Researchers (NT): ENTp, ENTj, INTp, INTj; or ILE, LIE, ILI, LII
• Socials (SF): ESFp, ESFj, ISFp, ISFj; or SEE, ESE, SEI, ESI
• Humanitarians (NF): ENFp, ENFj, INFp, INFj; or IEE, EIE, IEI, EII

Temperaments[edit]

Viktor Gulenko's hypothesis of the existence of four temperaments in socionics is as follows.^[152]

• Extraverted Rational Temperament (Ej). Extraverted rational types, namely the ESE, EIE, LIE, and LSE, are characterized by energetic and proactive behavior. (close to choleric temperament)
• Introverted Rational Temperament (Ij). Introverted rational types, namely the LII, LSI, ESI, and EII, are characterized by slow and methodical behavior. (close to phlegmatic temperament)
• Extraverted Irrational Temperament (Ep). Extraverted irrational types, namely the ILE, SLE, SEE, and IEE, are characterized by impulsive and unpredictable behavior. (close to sanguine temperament)
• Introverted Irrational Temperament (Ip). Introverted irrational types, namely the SEI, IEI, ILI, and SLI, are characterized by lack of motivation, inertia, and unstable moods and energy levels. (close to melancholic temperament)

Beside Gulenko's, there are several other theories of correlation between temperaments and socionic types, although almost all socionic^[who?] authors support Eysenck's view that temperaments do correlate with the E/I factor.^{[citation needed]}

Other models[edit]

In addition to Model A, two other models are in wide use^{[citation needed]} by socionists. Model B, created by Aleksandr Bukalov, is designed to reconcile the socionics standpoint with the so-called "Model J" (Jung's outlook) and uses sixteen functional components instead of eight. The model uses the same eight functions as Model A, but further differentiates them by attributing positive and negative polarities to each.^[153] Model B also refines Model A's strong/weak concept by attributing vectors of dimensionality to each function.^[148] This allows it to describe with precision why some functions are relied on more than others.

The four dimensions are

• Globality (also thought of as "time")
• Situation
• Cultural normatives
• Experience

Experience is the lowest dimension; globality is the highest.^{[citation needed]} The importance of the dimension system lies in its clarification of the differences between strong and weak functions. Although any type may learn information specific to any function with adequate study, only the strong functions have the vectors of situation which are required to create new knowledge. The types are thus reliant on each other in their search for understanding.^{[citation needed]}

Model T[edit]

In 2006, Viktor Talanov sought to identify cognitive correlates for functions.^[154] Recent advances in cognitive psychology have facilitated understanding of information processing at the cognitive level.^{[citation needed]} Introversion has been correlated to high brain-blood levels; extroversion to lower levels. Viktor Talanov has proposed^{[citation needed]} to identify the processing centers of the four Jungian functions—logic, ethics, intuition, and sensing—as a first step towards demonstrating the existence of the function types. (called simply "functions" in socionics).^[155]

Methods of type identification[edit]

Socionists^[who?] often use several methods when determining a personality type^{[citation needed]}.

• Analysis of behavior, interview (including special questionnaires), biography
• Tests
• Analysis of nonverbal behavior (mimic, gestures, plastique, etc.)

Nonverbal behavior (also called image method) is a particularly popular method popularized by Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, but rarely used as basic method, more as auxiliary^{[citation needed]}. It is based on analysis of impressions from nonverbal behavior and associating them with features of types. Often the image method is used to create an initial hypothesis about a person's type, which is tested against more reliable methods.

Several socionists^[who?] have linked type traits to regular facial expressions and constancies of gaze.^{[156][157][clarification needed]}

Development of socionics[edit]

Academics[edit]

This section may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve it by replacing them with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent, third-party sources. (December 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Currently socionics has wide academic recognition and is taught in over 150 universities in Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan and other CIS countries, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Romania.^[87][158] Its methods are used in a variety of humanitarian and technical disciplines, as evidenced by more than 800 doctoral theses.^[105] International Institute of Socionics and various universities have been performed numerous experiments to test the theory of socionics, which was attended by over 10,000 people.^{[159][clarification needed]}

Socionics has been brought up at conferences on psychology, where its practical applications were discussed. For instance, in 2005, socionics was discussed at the British and East European Psychology Meeting in Kraków, Poland, which was attended by British, American and Eastern European psychologists.^[160][161] Psychologist Rosemary Nodder from the University of Hertfordshire represented socionics for the event.^[162]

Empiricism[edit]

The problems of socionics, its methodology and prospects for development are brought up frequently^{[by whom?]} at International Socionics conferences (see list of conference talks (in Russian)).^[163]

Criticism[edit]

The opinion of scientific community about socionics is not uniform. Socionic analysts and theorists see it as "the fusion of science and technology that makes it possible to predict behavior and activity style of an individual, group of people, and society as a whole" and "the science that discovered the laws of human compatibility".^[164] Psychophysiologist Sergey Bogomaz in 2000 noted that there is no basis to recognize socionics as a separate science. At the beginning of his monograph on socionics in 2000, he argued that that many propositions in socionics lack empirical verification and a large number of "unsystematic pseudoscientific publications, which are characterized by an overly enthusiastic character (sometimes even with elements of excitement)" discredited, according to his opinion from 1995, socionics in the eyes of psychologists. But after that he considered socionics post-Jungian typology which is more promising than MBTI due to the inclusion of greater number of typological features and the formulation of prerequisites for the study of intertype relationships.^[165] He have found the theory of intertype relationships a valuable contribution of Aušra Augustinavičiūtė to Jungian psychology. ^[165] In later publications Bogomaz used socionics and Jungian typology for psychological research ^{[166][167][168]}

Philosopher L. M. Monastirsky ^[169] identified the use of speculative categories as the first shortcoming of socionics. Secondly, he stated that it lacks clearly defined typing method and each socionics school defines methods of their own. At the same time Monastirsky, recognizing the potential of socionics, proposed to turn to the concept of a socionic type for carrying out some research in the field of the methodology of science.^[169] An important issue in the field of socionics is the problem of convergence between type diagnoses of different analysts. Vladimir Ermak showed that ignorance of model A of the type of information metabolism leads to numerous mistakes in the definition of a socionic type.^[170] The effects of those mistakes manifested during large typing experiment conducted in 1999 at the socionics conference in Dnipropetrovsk where poor convergence of results have occurred. For example, 10 different psychological types have been assigned to one person examined by 26 experts and 8 types to other person examined by 16 experts. At the same time, most people who called themselves experts had little experience in determining people's types. 18 participants from 43 did not have any experience in practical determination of socionic types and 8 participants had experience in determining the socionic type of less than 100 people. Only three people had practical experience with more than 1000 people.^[171] In his analysis of this experiment, Ermak demonstrated various errors in the understanding of types by those people who considered themselves experts, but did not have the necessary qualifications and did not know the socionic model A, which describes the information structure of the psyche.^[170] Negative results of the Dnipropetrovsk experiment motivated socionic analysts to develop more rigorous approaches to type diagnosis in the early 2000s.^[172]

See also[edit]

• Analytical psychology
• Jungian Type Index
• Philosophical realism
• Information metabolism

References[edit]