User talk:1.39.15.165

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 1.39.15.165, has made unconstructive edits to the page 2016 JNU sedition controversy, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 12:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 JNU sedition controversy[edit]

Hi there. You've removed twice the following info, because it's "biased" and "not proven yet":

"According to India Today, "Anti-India" slogans like "Kashmir ki azadi tak jung chalegi, Bharat ki barbadi tak jung chalegi" ("War will continue till Kashmir's freedom, war will continue till India's demolition") were "reportedly[by whom?] raised at the protest meet."[1][2]"

References

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference IndiaToday.in_2016 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ See also IndiaBTL at Twitter, Y'day, In JNU- "Kashmir ki azadi tak, jung chalegi, Bharat ki barbadi tak, jung chalegi" Anti-national communists., including short video.

It doesn't matter if it's proven or not; it's what India Today states, and what people believe. Therefore, it's relevant to mention. As you may not have noticed, there's a tag added to the text, namely "reportedly{{by whom|date=February 2016}}", precisely because it's unclear what happened. I understand your reaction, I guess, but the info will stay there, because it's relevant for the bigger picture. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

August 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kariya Munda have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.