Page move-protected

Wikipedia:Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wikipedia Help Desk
  • This page is only for questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia. For other types of questions, use the search box or the Reference desk.
  • Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
  • We are all volunteers, so sometimes replies can take some time. Please be patient. Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.

  • New users: While this is a good place to ask questions, new users may prefer to ask for help at the Teahouse, an area specifically for new users to get help with editing, article creation, and general Wikipedia use, in a friendly environment.
Are you in the right place?

September 11[edit]

Translate a page to English from Malayalam[edit]

Hi please transalate this page to English

https://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B4%B8%E0%B4%9C%E0%B4%BF_%E0%B4%A4%E0%B5%8B%E0%B4%AE%E0%B4%B8%E0%B5%8D

thank you regards Asha — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.180.148.176 (talk) 08:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey anon. You can always add it to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Sports, although that list is not well maintained. I'm not sure we have a very large community of active editors who speak both English and Malayalam. So if you do speak both languages, you may want to consider reviewing our tutorial on writing your first article, and submitting a translation yourself to our Articles for Creation project. GMGtalk 15:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

incorrect entry[edit]

this entry on the welcome page is not written right. the law did allow all sex acts but has now been changed. i cannot edit the welcome page, so someone else should make a correction. my suggested fix is IN CAPS, below.

The Supreme Court of India strikes down portions of the colonial-era Section 377, thereby NOW making all private consensual sexual acts between adults ILlegal.

Mlcred (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

@Mlcred: Hello and welcome. If you believe something that appears on the Main Page("welcome page") is incorrect, it can be reported to WP:ERRORS or Talk:Main Page. As someone who follows that page, I don't really see the distinction between your suggestion and what is there now. 331dot (talk) 14:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
The Main Page states that "all private consensual sexual acts between adults [are now] legal". Mlcred claims that they are now illegal (which seems implausible, and unenforceable). Maproom (talk) 16:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

my profuse apologies to everyone. i absolutely read the entry totally wrong. it is accurate as written. again, sorry for my temporary stupidity. Mlcred (talk) 15:39, 13 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlcred (talkcontribs) 15:39, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

No problem. And if you are willing to apologize for something like this, then you'll probably be a better long term editor than a lot of those who edit. Again, welcome.Naraht (talk) 16:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Help:Cite errors/Cite error references no text[edit]

What is this error?

Cite error: The named reference e16 was invoked but never defined (see the help page). 

page was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awadhi_language — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sattvic7 (talkcontribs) 16:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Corrected... Lourdes 17:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
@Sattvic7: To actually answer your question (teach a man to fish):
The infobox invokes the named reference e16 with the code <ref name=e16/>, but no reference with that name is defined anywhere in the page. The error was introduced on 7 July, by User:C1MM, in this edit. It removed the infobox parameter |ref=e16, which according to that template's doc generated the required e16 ref. I would leave it to C1MM to determine the appropriate fix in this case. ―Mandruss  17:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey, thanks a lot! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sattvic7 (talkcontribs) 17:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Replacing old photo with new[edit]

Hi there. We just uploaded a new main photo to replace the old main photo and for some reason it is only appearing when you click on the current image. We are wanting to replace the old image we originally uploaded with this new image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trafficcityllc (talkcontribs) 23:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: OP blocked because account's name and purpose violates our policies. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

September 12[edit]

"My Favorite Teacher" by Thomas Friedman[edit]

Hi,

I have a School assignment about an article specially wrote on Wikipedia Style about "My Favorite Teacher" by Thomas Friedman published in The New York Times Newspaper on January 09, 2001. I have tried to find it but it is impossible. Could you please let me know how I can get that article? Thank you,

Martha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imelda6363 (talkcontribs) 04:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

If you're looking for a Wikipedia article about that, it doesn't exist. However, here's a link to the New York Times piece: Foreign Affairs; My Favorite Teacher. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 04:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Imelda6363. If your assignment is to write an article about that Friedman piece in the style of a Wikipedia article, then an essay called Your first article may be useful to you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Bob Woodward page hacked[edit]

Hello,

I searched Bob Woodward’s page today and yesterday and noticed it looks like it has been altered repeatedly recently. The content now only shows mainly negative criticism of the journalist and has very little information on his Watergate days. If you want to really earn money via fundraising, please show that your site is not biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:243:300:16A3:9C1:13C3:4E0:F9F6 (talk) 04:48, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Every Wikipedia article has an associated talk page for discussions about improvement to that article. That is where concerns like yours should be discussed. To access an article's talk page, click the "Talk" tab near the top of the article page. ―Mandruss  05:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
A couple of days ago an editor moved some sections around-the section "awards and recognition" was moved further down the page, after the rest of his career history, to match the standard layout for bio pages. No text was changed or removed. According to the history of the page, there has only been some minor copyediting,(reformatting of references, grammar fixes) etc for the past 8 months; no rewriting, removal or or addition of content at all. It was protected on 5 Sept. as it was being vandalized, but the vandalism was reverted pretty much immediately. You can always check the history yourself if you look to the left and click on "view history", you can see every change made to the page since it was first written. Curdle (talk) 10:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
@Curdle: Regardless of the situation, that's a discussion that belongs on the article talk page, not here. The only response to such a post should be a pointer to article talk. ―Mandruss  11:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

United Nations World Summit Award - should be moved back to World Summit Award[edit]

Dear all,

Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_World_Summit_Awards

The name of award is: World Summit Award NOT United Nations World Summit Award.

Please, help with changing it back to the original. Web page: https://www.worldsummitawards.org/

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulm123 (talkcontribs) 11:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

@Ulm123: Every Wikipedia article has an associated talk page for discussions about improvement to that article. That is where concerns like yours should be discussed. To access an article's talk page, click the "Talk" tab near the top of the article page. ―Mandruss  11:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Ulm123, while what Mandruss writes is the procedure you should follow, I have for now renamed the said article, based on the primary reference confirming the same. Thanks, Lourdes 11:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

User page boxes[edit]

Sup helpdeskers. Wot it is: if you look at my ancient userpage, it's got those two boxes with autoflow side by side; is it possible to have three of equal dimensions also side by side but with no autoflow? If so...? Pretty please to show me how :) cheers! —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 15:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Serial Number 54129, do you mean the overflow property as to autoflow? WBGconverse 15:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Clearly. Now; what's the answer? :p —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 15:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
My PC is behaving erratically(: At any case, see User:Winged Blades of Godric/design, (except for the alignment). WBGconverse 16:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
@Winged Blades of Godric: That's fantastic, thanks! Would it be possible—sorry, just a couple of ideas—to have the third box the same size as the other, and also maybe make the border transparant? Sorry about your PC. Nothing to do with that Wikidowntime they had early? —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 16:57, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Serial Number 54129, when you say that the third box be of the same size, I suppose you mean, that the borders of all the three boxes would enclose the same area? Actually, I was using the min-height property set to a trivial pixel (or one can use the auto parameter as to the height property) which extends the dimension of the box, per the amount of content in it.
If it is so, we are supposed to set the size of all the three boxes to a particular pixel that corresponds to the height of the box having the largest amount of content.Accordingly, there will be a varying amount of white space(s) in the other ones.
But, the most fundamental problem in going for a fixed height is that this length of the box varies across viewing environments and since, it cannot be auto-adjusted per the content, the content often-overshoots the height parameter.Without the overflow property, the additional content plainly renders itself outside of the box in a messy manner.( The default overflow parameter is visible).Try to see this revision across a variety of devices:-) Or try to view your old user page, in a similar fashion (you may alter the height, per your wish) after removing the overflow parameter, across different environments.
One can go for scalability, re-flowing et al but I don't think it to be possible without a lot of code-bloat.
Me personally thinks that the overflow property handles a lot of situation meticulously and this version is good-enough.Feel free to tamper with the height, per your wish:)
As to transparency of border, if you mean completely transparent, the rendering is over this edit.
If you plan to affect the opacity of the border, you have to go for a RGBA color with corresponding values for the alpha channel where 0.0 (fully transparent) and 1.0 (fully opaque).See this edit of mine, for an example.
As to my PC, it's behaving weirdly for the past few days.But, might be equally connected with the wiki-downtime! WBGconverse 05:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

U.S.-China Green Fund - article deleted[edit]

Dear Editor,

I created a page called U.S.-China Green Fund but it looks like it has been deleted. Can you please let me know why this is the case?

Thanks, Annie — Preceding unsigned comment added by AYZhou (talkcontribs) 17:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

If you click on the red link to the article it will show you the deletion log with the reason for deletion. There are further useful links in the message on your user talk page. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Updating articles on wikipedia[edit]

Hello ,

I have edited couple of historical articles and noticed that some users who watch the articles and have more expereince reverted back the edits due to some political affiliation and may not like the updates although it was backed by historical references .

How do you walk that thin line ? obvioulsy is not good to keep editing and reverting back how does wikipedia resolve those type of conflicts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.81.103.41 (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Please see Dispute resolution, which describes a number of approaches to resolving disputes between editors. However, also be sure to read your Talk page if you are the one being reverted for an explanation of why the edit was reverted, and see Assume good faith. The likelihood that "users ... with more experience reverted ... due [exclusively] to some political affiliation" is low, because usually this behavior results in the user being eventually blocked. There is more often a sound policy-based reason for the reversion. General Ization Talk 18:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Broken reference links[edit]

Hello. Can somebody help me fix the links to the corresponding work within the references for "Magie" here? I suppose they don't work due to the Roman numbers used as page references, but I don't know how to solve that problem. Thanks a lot in advance for any support!--Neufund (talk) 19:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Done - @Neufund:, the last2 parameter was used incorrectly. By the way, you probably are aware of this but the "Historia Augusta & 395 AD" anchors still need work - they are out of sync with the current parameters (not sure how to solve it, but I'll take a look - done and fixed too, sort of). GermanJoe (talk) 20:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much! Best wishes,--Neufund (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)


September 13[edit]

Malicious editing of "No Labels" article[edit]

I wanted to remove POV and promotional language for the No Labels organization from its article , but someone keeps reverting my edits to a version that makes clearly malicious statement toward the organization. It may be that the article should be locked, or a header warning readers that the article is non-neutral (I don't know how to do that yet.) At any rate, someone should keep an eye on this page. I've got to go babysit grandkids for a while. EveningStarNM (talk) 00:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Well, the IP has been warned quite a few times. I believe the IP would be blocked if they continue their attempts again. That said, two of your consecutive reverts of another IP's edits resulted in re-inserting non-npov and disruptive material here and here; quite similar to the primary disruptive IP's edits. I feel you may have done this mistakenly and in a hurry. But that's no excuse that most admins would buy. So please be careful and review the page after you undertake such reverts. Thanks, Lourdes 09:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
If the disruption continues, you can also try to ask for temporary page protection to stop the PoV pushing and encourage talkpage discussion. Subjective or vague political labels are often problematic especially in controversial articles. If you can't find an indisputable source for such labels, it's often better to avoid them altogether - even if you believe they are entirely correct. I'd also note that the organization's own self-promotional description is inappropriate for the first lead sentence. The organization's goals and activities should be described from an uninvolved PoV based on independent sources. Their own PR statements are largely irrelevant. GermanJoe (talk) 09:40, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Question about lineup information for music festival[edit]

Someone removed a load of line-up information from this page back in April citing "sea of redlinks and mislinks", and yesterday I reverted it because it was useful information and it seemed a shame that someone had put effort into adding it and it had been removed. I accidentally didn't add a note to my undo, I was going to say "lots of information removed for seemingly no good reason". Now the person has undone my undo, saying "unexplained restoration of listcruft". I asked on #wikipedia before my initial undo and I was told by someone that red links are not a good reason to remove information, and I don't understand in general why so much info needed to be removed. It was a useful way of seeing the past lineups and locations for the festival. Can I add this information back once again, and what should I say in the edit note once I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bojo Skankins (talkcontribs) 10:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Bojo Skankins (talk) 10:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

  • No. Don't place the stuff back. Talk:Bloc Festival is the place you can post a query to TenPoundHammer and ask for their comments. In my view, the deletion of the excessive material is sensible. Not only does the material seem promotional and fan cruft, but the excessive number of red links do come out as unrequired. The maximum that can perhaps be done (again, in my opinion) is add a paragraph which consolidates names of some of the notable acts that have performed in the past few years. But again, take this up on the talk page for more inputs. Thanks, Lourdes 10:30, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
How is it promotional if it's literally just listing the names of artists that have played, and the locations and dates of the festival over the years? Other festivals pages have a similar thing, look at Lovebox Festival or Wireless Festival. If the issue is the amount of artists listed, then why not just reduce that instead of deleting everything? Now we literally have no information about the dates the festival was held and where it was held. Can we at least keep the dates and locations of the festival there, and maybe some of the headliners? I'd be happy to pull up some of the lineup flyers and whittle the list of artists down if that's the only problem. Bojo Skankins (talk) 11:49, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Bojo, you probably are not reading my reply properly. Please read my reply again so that you understand the points I have noted. (a) Take this discussion up on the talk page of the article (b) It may probably be sensible to list a summary of the notable artists who have performed over the years; as you mention, it may also be sensible to list in short the dates when this event has occurred. (c) Irrespective, see point (a). Lourdes 12:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for the help. Is there a way I can tag the appropriate person in a post on the talk page so that they see my post? Bojo Skankins (talk) 13:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Bojo Skankins, you can ping editors like TenPoundHammer by typing {{u|TenPoundHammer}} on the talk page. See the part titled "Mentions" at Wikipedia:Notifications#Alerts for more information. Warmly, Lourdes 15:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Subscribe to National "something" day[edit]

I used to get an email every day detailing it as National "something or other" Day, for example==Sept 11 was National Patriots Day. I am no longer getting this for some reason but would like to start receiving it again Can you help? Will you subscribe me for this daily email? Thank you Ed R — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.235.125 (talk) 10:50, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Editing protected page[edit]

Dear,

I'm writing to you in order to inquire about the procedure for opening a specific page for editing. The page in question is rather controversial (https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabirni_logor_Jasenovac). It focuses on the WWII concentration and death camp and in current form represents an insult to families of victims that were executed in that camp- Also it serves as an example for how administrators bend the Wikipedia rules and protect pages that are not based on facts, representative references and ultimately distort the history.

Best,

Igor N. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mister IgorN (talkcontribs) 11:02, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

@Mister IgorN: Hello, this is the help desk for the English Wikipedia. A page offering assistance for the 'hr' version can be found here. If you have misgivings about an article there is a section specifically for that at that page, but you might also consider raising your concerns at the article talk page. Please note that Wikipedia is not censored. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 11:43, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Image size and plaecment on Voyager program[edit]

The very first image on the Voyager program article seems a bit big to me. I've had a scan through MOS but I can't see any guidance on the first image in an article when there's no infobox. The current image isn't unacceptable, but it does seem just too big.

Is there a precedent or policy? Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:08, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Probably a syntax error which I just corrected. The previous syntax was [[File:(filename)|thumb|440px|(caption)]]; as far as I understand, thumb was overriden by 440px, so I removed the latter. MOS:IMGSIZE says Only where a smaller or larger image is appropriate... (do stuff to change image size); I can see no reason to keep the image that big, much less specified in pixels. TigraanClick here to contact me 11:39, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Clarence Thomas Associate Justice of the Supreme Court[edit]

How come on his page he is listed as a Judge not a Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Think you need to address this and correct.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:4B80:8BDE:2505:C875:458A:C36A (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, at the page Clarence Thomas, the opening sentence states, "who currently serves as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States", so it is not clear what your issue relates to? Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 12:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict) In Clarence Thomas the short description says "Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States", the first sentence of the lede says that he "currently serves as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States", and the infobox describes him as "Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States". That all seems pretty clear? --David Biddulph (talk) 12:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Maybe they are referring to Clarence Thomas (disambiguation), which says "judge"? 331dot (talk) 12:16, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
That sounds plausible, I changed it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Edit being reverted as not constructive[edit]

Trying to edit this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Taylor_Gatto

A website known as school sucks project has express permission from John Taylor Gatto to a serious of youtube videos where Gatto's books are read and put to video. I am trying to add this to the wiki page because it is John Taylor Gatto's content.

https://schoolsucksproject.com/john-taylor-gatto/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmclain637 (talkcontribs) 14:35, September 13, 2018 (UTC)

  • It's a non-notable website, not reliable per our standard guidelines. Your repetitive additions of the website to Wikipedia articles may be considered attempts to promote the website. I understand that may not be your intent here; but it may be seen that way. Let it be and don't re-add the link. I've reverted your latest addition. Warmly, Lourdes 15:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

USA Truck, Inc. is not showing up in Wiki[edit]

How can we restore this page since someone has deleted it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassidill.a (talkcontribs) 16:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

The article's copyright problems are discussed at WP:Copyright problems/2018 August 9, and in that situation an admin will not restore it. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:32, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
(ec) If the article you are referring to is USA Truck, it was deleted due to copyright problems. It will not be possible to restore what was deleted. If this company meets the notability guidelines for companies written at WP:ORG, it may merit an article but it should consist of original text. If you work for or represent USA Truck, you need to review the conflict of interest and paid editing policies. (the latter is mandatory per Wikipedia's Terms of Use for paid editors) 331dot (talk) 16:34, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

How to get a consensus[edit]

I've had a few wikipedia articles that I've had edited roll back for certain reasons, and I want to find a way to get a consensus on some things. How do I do that? Johnnysama (talk) 17:58, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Discuss the changes on the article talk page and allow consensus to form there. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Reassessing articles[edit]

Hey help desk folks. Just wondering, what's the best way to request a reassessment on an article which you created and would like a second opinion on the rating (otherwise I would just reass it myself myself), but the WikiProject's Assessments/Requests page is completely dead? When I create articles, they tend to start off as stubs, and therefore get assessed as stub or start class, but then I'll sometimes expand them to what would probably be C or B class.--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 19:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

I don't really know what you should do in that circumstance (normally I would say the WikiProject assessment/request, but that obviously won't work). If you post the articles here I (or someone else) can probably take a look - I'm not sure what you should do if this remains a problem - is there a wikiproject of assessments (which I couldn't find), and if so, is it active? I could probably look at things if you posted them on my talk page. LittlePuppers (talk) 00:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
@LittlePuppers: Thanks for replying. In this particular case, I'm thinking that the Southern eagle ray page could probably be upgraded to B or at least C class. I created it and expanded it to over 10,000 bytes a few months ago, and have been tweaking, refining, and copy-editing recently; and it appears to now meet the B-Class criteria. I listed it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes/Assessment/Requests a long ways back, but didn't get any response - it appears that I'm the only person actually responding to requests on that page at the moment. Face-smile.svg Cheers, --SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 00:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
@SkyGazer 512: I've looked through it and I'm not seeing anything that would prevent it from being b-class, so I've reassessed it as such. LittlePuppers (talk) 01:04, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the reassessment. The tweaks you made to the article also look really nice.--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 01:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk template for page views[edit]

There is a talk page template for page views. Do you know the template's name? I can't find it. Many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:21, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

@Anna Frodesiak: {{Annual readership}}. Sam Sailor 21:32, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Hi Anna Frodesiak - Template:Graph:PageViews is the basic template for the number of page views to go on an article's talk page. There's also Template:Annual readership, which easily reports the daily page views of an article over time along with a header, using {{Graph:PageViews}}. Cheers, --SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 21:34, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
What you would recommend for 2018 Pacific typhoon season? Perhaps you could add what is appropriate and I can watch and learn. Thank you both! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:51, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
@Anna Frodesiak: How does this look?--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 21:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Oh, thanks for the tweak Sam Sailor - that looks much better. Face-smile.svg--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 22:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Looks great! Thank you both. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:58, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Incorrect name[edit]

My sons wiki page has been changed recently. Now his name is incorrectly listed as Joseph Cole Custer. His correct name is Cole Matthew Custer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:B109:6ACE:A1B5:23B0:6C4D:E3B4 (talk) 22:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Fixed by reverting vandalism. Note that the middle name was removed altogether, as there is no reliable source found for it (and we cannot regard your anonymous request as a reliable source to change it to the one you specified). General Ization Talk 22:29, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

September 14[edit]

Help:Cite errors/Cite error ref no input[edit]

 2015- 2017 Shelby GTE   

1) Please remove: "There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page)". 2) Please remove: "jpg 4191" and "jpg 4193" from below the paragraph; I cannot figure out how to insert these pictures(my pics) into the section. Thx, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nascarbilly (talkcontribs) 14 September 2018 04:17 (UTC)

@Nascarbilly:  Done. Images are best uploaded to Wiki commons (contributions at top of any page > uploads > commons). If you are logged in, you should find your account available there. The upload wizard will guide you through the process and licensing. A preformatted link will then be available to use on Wiki pages Please provide a link when posting questions on talk pages. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thankyou. Eagleash (talk) 05:10, 14 September 2018 (UTC)


Harry Levy-Lawson, 1st Viscount Burnham[edit]

Sorry - I tried to make a file I myself in the section on this page titled - Family, interests and Hall Barn. I wanted to make the file added a little larger but I accidently removed it altogether - Please repair if you can. thanksSrbernadette (talk) 06:39, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done Maproom (talk) 07:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Most viewed Wikipedia pages within a subject[edit]

Is there a way to see the most Wikipedia pages within a certain subject? For example, can I see the most viewed pages relating to electronic musical instruments? This would help me decide which articles to work on next, as I'd like to prioritise based on how widely read a page is. Popcornduff (talk) 06:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)