Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox
The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox is a thought experiment proposed by physicists Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen which argues that the description of physical reality provided by quantum mechanics is incomplete. In a 1935 paper titled "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?", they argued for the existence of "elements of reality" that were not part of quantum theory, and speculated that it should be possible to construct a theory containing these hidden variables. Resolutions of the paradox have important implications for the interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Albert Einstein
Article headline regarding the EPR paradox paper in the May 4, 1935, issue of The New York Times.
A thought experiment is a hypothetical situation in which a hypothesis, theory, or principle is laid out for the purpose of thinking through its consequences. The concept is also referred to as a Gedankenexperiment within the work of Ernst Mach and includes thoughts about what may have occurred if a different course of action were taken as opposed to what did in fact occur. The importance of this ability is that it allows us to imagine what may occur in the future, as well as the implication of alternate courses of action.
Temporal representation of a prefactual thought experiment
Temporal representation of a counterfactual thought experiment
Temporal representation of a semifactual thought experiment
Temporal representation of prediction, forecasting and nowcasting