# Ellipse

In mathematics, an **ellipse** is a curve in a plane surrounding two focal points such that the sum of the distances to the two focal points is constant for every point on the curve. As such, it is a generalization of a circle, which is a special type of an ellipse having both focal points at the same location. The shape of an ellipse (how "elongated" it is) is represented by its eccentricity, which for an ellipse can be any number from 0 (the limiting case of a circle) to arbitrarily close to but less than 1.

Ellipses are the closed type of conic section: a plane curve resulting from the intersection of a cone by a plane (see figure to the right). Ellipses have many similarities with the other two forms of conic sections: parabolas and hyperbolas, both of which are open and unbounded. The cross section of a cylinder is an ellipse, unless the section is parallel to the axis of the cylinder.

Analytically, an ellipse may also be defined as the set of points such that the ratio of the distance of each point on the curve from a given point (called a focus or focal point) to the distance from that same point on the curve to a given line (called the directrix) is a constant. This ratio is the above-mentioned eccentricity of the ellipse.

An ellipse may also be defined analytically as the set of points for each of which the sum of its distances to two foci is a fixed number.

Ellipses are common in physics, astronomy and engineering. For example, the orbit of each planet in our solar system is approximately an ellipse with the barycenter of the planet–Sun pair at one of the focal points. The same is true for moons orbiting planets and all other systems having two astronomical bodies. The shapes of planets and stars are often well described by ellipsoids. Ellipses also arise as images of a circle under parallel projection and the bounded cases of perspective projection, which are simply intersections of the projective cone with the plane of projection. It is also the simplest Lissajous figure formed when the horizontal and vertical motions are sinusoids with the same frequency. A similar effect leads to elliptical polarization of light in optics.

The name, ἔλλειψις (*élleipsis*, "omission"), was given by Apollonius of Perga in his *Conics*, emphasizing the connection of the curve with "application of areas".

## Contents

- 1 Definition of an ellipse as locus of points
- 2 Ellipse in Cartesian coordinates
- 3 Definition of an ellipse by the directrix property
- 4 The normal bisects the angle between the lines to the foci
- 5 Ellipse as an affine image of the unit circle x²+y²=1
- 6 Conjugate diameters and the midpoints of parallel chords
- 7 Orthogonal tangents
- 8 Theorem of Apollonios on conjugate diameters
- 9 Drawing ellipses
- 10 Inscribed angles for ellipses and the 3-point-form
- 11 Pole-polar relation for an ellipse
- 12 Metric properties
- 13 Ellipse as quadric
- 14 Polar forms
- 15 Ellipse as hypotrochoid
- 16 Ellipses as plane sections of quadrics
- 17 Applications
- 18 See also
- 19 Notes
- 20 References
- 21 External links

## Definition of an ellipse as locus of points[edit]

An ellipse can be defined geometrically as a set of points (locus of points) in the Euclidean plane:

- An
**ellipse**can be defined using two fixed points, , , called the**foci**and a distance, usually denoted . The ellipse defined with , and is the set of points such that the sum of the distances is constant and equal to . In order to omit the special case of a line segment, one assumes More formally, for a given , an ellipse is the set

The midpoint of the line segment joining the foci is called the **center** of the ellipse. The line through the foci is called the **major axis**, and the line perpendicular to it through the center is called the **minor axis**. The major axis contains the **vertices** , which have distance to the center. The distance of the foci to the center is called the **focal distance** or **linear eccentricity**. The quotient is the **eccentricity** .

The case yields a circle and is included.

The equation can be viewed in a different way (see picture):

If is the circle with midpoint and radius , then the distance of a point to the circle equals the distance to the focus :

is called the **circular directrix** (related to focus ) of the ellipse.^{[1]}^{[2]} This property should not be confused with the definition of an ellipse with help of a directrix (line) below.

Using Dandelin spheres one proves easily the important statement:

- Any
*plane section of a cone*with a plane, which does not contain the apex and whose slope is less than the slope of the lines on the cone, is an ellipse.

## Ellipse in Cartesian coordinates[edit]

### Equation[edit]

If Cartesian coordinates are introduced such that the origin is the center of the ellipse and the *x*-axis is the major axis and

- the
*foci*are the points , - the
*vertices*are .

For an arbitrary point the distance to the focus is and to the second focus . Hence the point is on the ellipse if the following condition is fulfilled

Remove the square roots by suitable squarings and use the relation to obtain the equation of the ellipse:

or, solved for *y*,

The shape parameters are called the semi-major and semi-minor axes. The points are the **co-vertices**.

It follows from the equation that the ellipse is *symmetric* with respect to both of the coordinate axes and hence symmetric with respect to the origin.

### Eccentricity[edit]

The eccentricity of an ellipse can be expressed in terms of the semi-major and semi-minor axes as

### Semi-latus rectum[edit]

The length of the chord through one of the foci, which is perpendicular to the major axis of the ellipse is called the **latus rectum**. One half of it is the **semi-latus rectum** . A calculation shows

The semi-latus rectum may also be viewed as the *radius of curvature * of the osculating circles at the vertices .

### Tangent[edit]

An arbitrary line intersects an ellipse at *0, 1 or 2* points. In the first case the line is called *exterior line*, in the second case **tangent** and *secant* in the third case. Through any point of an ellipse there is exactly *one* tangent.

- The tangent at a point of the ellipse has the coordinate equation
- A vector equation of the tangent is
- with

**Proof:**
Let be an ellipse point and the vector equation of a line (containing ). Inserting the line's equation into the ellipse equation and respecting yields:

In case of line and the ellipse have only point in common and is a *tangent*. The tangent direction is orthogonal to vector which is then a normal vector of the tangent and the tangent has the equation with a still unknown . Because is on the tangent and on the ellipse, one gets .

In case of line has a second point with the ellipse in common.

With help of (1) one easily checks, that is a tangent vector at point , which proves the vector equation.

*Remark:* If and are two points of the ellipse, such that
holds, then the points lie on two **conjugate diameters** of the Ellipse (see below). In case of the ellipse is a circle and "conjugate" means "orthogonal".

### Equation of a shifted ellipse[edit]

If the ellipse is shifted such that its center is the equation is

The axes are still parallel to the x- and y-axes.

### Parametric representation[edit]

**Standard parametric representation:**

Using the sine and cosine functions , a parametric representation of the ellipse can be obtained, :

Parameter *t* can be taken as shown in the diagram and is due to de la Hire.^{[3]}

The parameter *t* (called the **eccentric anomaly** in astronomy) is *not* the angle of with the *x*-axis (see diagram at right). For other interpretations of parameter *t* see section *Drawing ellipses*.

**Rational representation:**

With the substitution and trigonometric formulae one gets

and the *rational* parametric equation of an ellipse

which covers any point of the ellipse except the left vertex .

For this formula represents the right upper quarter of the ellipse moving counter-clockwise with increasing The left vertex is the limit

Rational representations of conic sections are popular with Computer Aided Design (see Bezier curve).

**Tangent slope as parameter:**

A parametric representation, which uses the slope of the tangent at a point of the ellipse
can be obtained from the derivative of the standard representation :

With help of trigonometric formulae one gets:

Replacing und of the standard representation one yields

Where is the slope of the tangent at the corresponding ellipse point, is the upper and the lower half of the ellipse. The points with vertical tangents (vertices) are not covered by the representation.

The equation of the tangent at point has the form . The still unknown can be determined by inserting the coordinates of the corresponding ellipse point :

This description of the tangents of an ellipse is an essential tool for the determination of the orthoptic of an ellipse. The orthoptic article contains another proof, which omits differential calculus and trigonometric formulae.

**Shifted Ellipse:**

A *shifted ellipse* with center can be described by

A parametric representation of an arbitrary ellipse is contained in the section *Ellipse as an affine image of the unit circle x²+y²=1* below.

### Remarks on the parameters a and b[edit]

The parameters and represent the lengths of line segments and are therefore non-negative real numbers. Throughout *this article* is the semi-major axis, i.e., In general the canonical ellipse equation may have (and hence the ellipse would be taller than it is wide); in this form the semi-major axis would be . This form can be converted to the form assumed in the remainder of this article simply by transposing the variable names and and the parameter names and

## Definition of an ellipse by the directrix property[edit]

The two lines at distance and parallel to the minor axis are called **directrices** of the ellipse (see diagram).

- For an arbitrary point of the ellipse, the quotient of the distance to one focus and to the corresponding directrix (see diagram) is equal to the eccentricity:

The proof for the pair follows from the fact that and satisfy the equation

The second case is proven analogously.

The *inverse statement* is also true and can be used to define an ellipse (in a manner similar to the definition of a parabola):

- For any point (focus), any line (directrix) not through , and any real number with the locus of points for which the quotient of the distances to the point and to the line is that is,

- is an ellipse.

The choice , which is the eccentricity of a circle, is in this context not allowed. One may consider the directrix of a circle to be the line at infinity.

(The choice yields a parabola, and if , a hyperbola.)

- Proof

Let , and assume is a point on the curve. The directrix has equation . With , the relation produces the equations

- and

The substitution yields

This is the equation of an *ellipse* (), or a *parabola* (), or a *hyperbola* (). All of these non-degenerate conics have, in common, the origin as a vertex (see diagram).

If , introduce new parameters so that , and then the equation above becomes

which is the equation of an ellipse with center , the *x*-axis as major axis, and
the major/minor semi axis .

- General case

If the focus is and the directrix , one obtains the equation

(The right side of the equation uses the Hesse normal form of a line to calculate the distance .)

## The normal bisects the angle between the lines to the foci[edit]

For an ellipse the following statement is true:

- The normal at a point bisects the angle between the lines .

- Proof

Because the tangent is perpendicular to the normal, the statement is true for the tangent and the supplementary angle of the angle between the lines to the foci (see diagram), too.

Let be the point on the line with the distance to the focus , is the semi-major axis of the ellipse. Let line be the bisector of the supplementary angle to the angle between the lines . In order to prove that is the tangent line at point , one checks that any point on line which is different from cannot be on the ellipse. Hence has only point in common with the ellipse and is, therefore, the tangent at point .

From the diagram and the triangle inequality one recognizes that holds, which means: . But if is a point of the ellipse, the sum should be .

- Application

The rays from one focus are reflected by the ellipse to the second focus. This property has optical and acoustic applications similar to the reflective property of a parabola (see whispering gallery).

## Ellipse as an affine image of the unit circle x²+y²=1[edit]

Another definition of an ellipse uses affine transformations:

- Any
*ellipse*is the affine image of the unit circle with equation .

An affine transformation of the Euclidean plane has the form , where is a regular matrix (its determinant is not 0) and is an arbitrary vector. If are the column vectors of the matrix , the unit circle is mapped onto the Ellipse

is the center, are the directions of two conjugate diameters of the ellipse. In general the vectors are not perpendicular. That means, in general and are *not* the vertices of the ellipse.

The tangent vector at point is

Because at a vertex the tangent is perpendicular to the major/minor axis (diameters) of the ellipse one gets the parameter of a vertex from the equation

and hence

- .

(The formulae were used.)

If , then .

The four *vertices* of the ellipse are

The advantage of this definition is that one gets a simple parametric representation of an arbitrary ellipse, even in the space, if the vectors are vectors of the Euclidean space.

## Conjugate diameters and the midpoints of parallel chords[edit]

For a circle, the property **(M)** holds:

**(M)**The midpoints of parallel chords lie on a diameter.

The diameter and the parallel chords are orthogonal. An affine transformation in general does not preserve orthogonality but does preserve parallelism and midpoints of line segments. Hence: property **(M)** (which omits the term *orthogonal*) is true for any ellipse.

- Definition

Two diameters of an ellipse are **conjugate** if the midpoints of chords parallel to lie on

From the diagram one finds:

**(T)**Two diameters , of an ellipse are*conjugate*, if the tangents at and are parallel to and visa versa.

The term *conjugate diameters* is a kind of generalization of *orthogonal*.

Considering the parametric equation

of an ellipse, any pair of points belong to a diameter and the pair belongs to its conjugate diameter.

## Orthogonal tangents[edit]

For the ellipse
the intersection points of *orthogonal* tangents lie on the circle .

This circle is called *orthoptic* of the given ellipse.

## Theorem of Apollonios on conjugate diameters[edit]

For an ellipse with semi-axes the following is true:

- Let and be halves of two conjugate diameters (see diagram) then

**(1)**,**(2)**the*triangle*formed by has the constant area**(3)**the parallelogram of tangents adjacent to the given conjugate diameters has the- Proof

Let the ellipse be in the canonical form with parametric equation

- .

The two points are on conjugate diameters (see previous section). From trigonometric formulae one gets and

The area of the triangle generated by is

and from the diagram it can be seen that the area of the parallelogram is 8 times that of . Hence

## Drawing ellipses[edit]

Ellipses appear in descriptive geometry as images (parallel or central projection) of circles (for details: see Ellipses in DG (German)). There exist various tools to draw an ellipse. Computers provide the fastest and most accurate method for drawing an ellipse. However, technical tools (*ellipsographs*) to draw an ellipse without a computer exist. The principle of ellipsographs were known to Greek mathematicians (Archimedes, Proklos).

If there is no ellipsograph available, the best and quickest way to draw an ellipse is to draw an Approximation by the four osculating circles at the vertices.

For any method described below

- the knowledge of the axes and the semi-axes is necessary (or equivalent: the foci and the semi-major axis).

If this presumption is not fulfilled one has to know at least two conjugate diameters. With help of Rytz's construction the axes and semi-axes can be retrieved.

### Pins-and-string method[edit]

The characterization of an ellipse as the locus of points so that sum of the distances to the foci is constant leads to a method of drawing one using two drawing pins, a length of string, and a pencil. In this method, pins are pushed into the paper at two points, which become the ellipse's foci. A string tied at each end to the two pins and the tip of a pencil pulls the loop taut to form a triangle. The tip of the pencil then traces an ellipse if it is moved while keeping the string taut. Using two pegs and a rope, gardeners use this procedure to outline an elliptical flower bed—thus it is called the *gardener's ellipse*.

A similar method for drawing confocal ellipses with a *closed* string is due to the Irish bishop Charles Graves.

### Paper strip methods[edit]

The two following methods rely on the parametric representation (see section *parametric representation*, above):

This representation can be modeled technically by two simple methods. In both cases center, the axes and semi axes have to be known.

- Method 1

The first method starts with

- a strip of paper of length .

The point, where the semi axes meet is marked by . If the strip slides with both ends on the axes of the desired ellipse, then point P traces the ellipse. For the proof one shows that point has the parametric representation , where parameter is the angle of the slope of the paper strip.

A *technichal realization* of the motion of the paper strip can be achieved by a Tusi couple (s. animation). The device is able to draw any ellipse with a *fixed* sum , which is the radius of the large circle. This restriction may be a disadvantage in real life. More flexible is the second paper strip method.

A nice application: If one stands somewhere in the middle of a ladder, which stands on a slippery ground and leans on a slippery wall, the ladder slides down and the persons feet trace an ellipse.

A *variation of the paper strip method 1*^{[4]} uses the observation, that the midpoint of the paper strip is moving on the circle with center (of the ellipse) and radius . Hence the paperstrip can be cut at point into halves, connected again by a joint at and the sliding end fixed at the center (see diagram). After this operation the movement of the unchanged half of the paperstrip is unchanged. The advantage of this variation is: Only one expensive sliding shoe is necessary.

One should be aware that the end, which is sliding on the minor axis, has to be changed.

- Method 2

The second method starts with

- a strip of paper of length .

One marks the point, which divides the strip into two substrips of length and . The strip is positioned onto the axes as described in the diagram. Then the free end of the strip traces an ellipse, while the strip is moved. For the proof, one recognizes that the tracing point can be described parametrically by , where parameter is the angle of slope of the paper strip.

This method is the base for several *ellipsographs* (see section below).

*Remark:* Similar to the variation of the paper strip method 1 a *variation of the paper strip method 2* can be established (see diagram) by cutting the part between the axes into halves.

Trammel of Archimedes (principle)

Ellipsograph due to Benjamin Bramer

### Approximation by osculating circles[edit]

From section *metric properties* one gets:

- The radius of curvature at the vertices is:

- the radius of curvature at the co-vertices is:

The diagram shows an easy way to find the centers of curvature at vertex and co-vertex , respectively:

- (1) mark the auxiliary point and draw the line segment
- (2) draw the line through , which is perpendicular to the line
- (3) the intersection points of this line with the axes are the centers of the osculating circles.

(proof: simple calculation.)

The centers for the remaining vertices are found by symmetry.

With help of a French curve one draws a curve, which has smooth contact to the osculating circles.

### Steiner generation of an ellipse[edit]

The following method to construct single points of an ellipse relies on the Steiner generation of a non degenerate conic section:

- Given two pencils of lines at two points (all lines containing and , respectively) and a projective but not perspective mapping of onto , then the intersection points of corresponding lines form a non-degenerate projective conic section.

For the generation of points of the ellipse one uses the pencils at the vertices . Let be an upper co-vertex of the ellipse and . is the center of the rectangle . The side of the rectangle is divided into n equal spaced line segments and this division is projected parallel with the diagonal as direction onto the line segment and assign the division as shown in the diagram. The parallel projection together with the reverse of the orientation is part of the projective mapping between the pencils at and needed. The intersection points of any two related lines and are points of the uniquely defined ellipse. With help of the points the points of the second quarter of the ellipse can be determined. Analogously one gets the points of the lower half of the ellipse.

*Remark:*

- The Steiner generation exists for hyperbolas and parabolas, too.
- The Steiner generation is sometimes called a
*parallelogram method*because one can use other points rather than the vertices, which starts with a parallelogram instead of a rectangle.

### Ellipsographs[edit]

Most technical instruments for drawing ellipses are based on the second paperstrip method.

For more principles of ellipsographs:

## Inscribed angles for ellipses and the 3-point-form[edit]

### Circles[edit]

A circle with equation is uniquely determined by three points not on a line. A simple way to determine the parameters uses the *inscribed angle theorem* for circles:

- For four points (see diagram) the following statement is true:
- The four points are on a circle if and only if the angles at and are equal.

Usually one measures inscribed angles by *degree* or *radian* . In order to get an equation of a circle determined by three points, the following measurement is more convenient:

- In order to
**measure an angle**between two lines with equations one uses the quotient

- This expression is the
*cotangent of the angle between the two lines*.

**Inscribed angle theorem for circles:**

- For four points , no three of them on a line (see diagram), the following statement is true:
- The four points are on a circle, if and only if the angles at and are equal. In the sense of the measurement above, that means, if

At first the masure is available for chords, which are not parallel to the y-axis, only. But the final formula works for any chord.

A consequence of the inscribed angle theorem for circles is the

**3-point-form of a circle's equation:**

- One gets the equation of the circle determined by 3 points not on a line by a conversion of the equation

Using vectors, dot products and determinants this formula can be arranged more clearly:

**Example:**

For the 3-pointform is

- , which can be rearranged to

### Ellipses[edit]

This section considers ellipses with an equation

where the ratio is *fixed*.
With the abbreviation one gets the more convenient form

- and
*fixed*.

Such ellipses have their axes parallel to the coordinate axes and their eccentricity fixed. Their major axes are parallel to the *x*-axis if and parallel to the *y*-axis if .

Like a circle, such an ellipse is determined by three points not on a line.

In this more general case one introduces the following measurement of an angle,:^{[5]}^{[6]}

- In order to
**measure an angle**between two lines with equations one uses the quotient

**Inscribed angle theorem for ellipses**

- For four points , no three of them on a line (see diagram), the following statement is true:
- The four points are on an ellipse with equation , if and only if the angles at and are equal in the sense of the measurement above—that is, if

At first the measure is available only for chords which are not parallel to the y-axis. But the final formula works for any chord. The proof follows from a straightforward calculation. For the direction of proof given that the points are on an ellipse, one can assume that the center of the ellipse is the origin.

A consequence of the inscribed angle theorem for ellipses is the

**3-point-form of an ellipse's equation:**

- One gets the equation of the ellipse determined by 3 points not on a line by a conversion of the equation

Analogously to the circle case this formula can be written more clearly using vectors:

where is the modified dot product

**Example:**

For and one gets the 3-point-form

- and after conversion

## Pole-polar relation for an ellipse[edit]

Any ellipse can be described in a suitable coordinate system by an equation . The equation of the tangent at a point of the ellipse is If one allows point to be an arbitrary point different from the origin, then

- point is mapped onto the line , not through the center of the ellipse.

This relation between points and lines is a bijection.

The inverse function maps

- line onto the point and

- line onto the point

Such a relation between points and lines generated by a conic is called **pole-polar relation** or just *polarity*. The pole is the point, the polar the line. See Pole and polar.

By calculation one can confirm the following properties of the pole-polar relation of the ellipse:

- For a point (pole)
*on*the ellipse the polar is the tangent at this point (see diagram: ). - For a pole
*outside*the ellipse the intersection points of its polar with the ellipse are the tangency points of the two tangents passing (see diagram: ). - For a point
*within*the ellipse the polar has no point with the ellipse in common. (see diagram: ).

*Remarks:*

- The intersection point of two polars is the pole of the line through their poles.
- The foci and respectively and the directrices and respectively belong to pairs of pole and polar.

Pole-polar relations exist for hyperbolas and parabolas, too.

## Metric properties[edit]

All metric properties given below refer to an ellipse with equation .

### Area[edit]

The area enclosed by an ellipse is:

where and are the lengths of the semi-major and semi-minor axes, respectively. The area formula is intuitive: start with a circle of radius (so its area is ) and stretch it by a factor to make an ellipse. This scales the area by the same factor: It is also easy to rigorously prove the area formula using integration as follows. Equation (**1**) can be rewritten as For this curve is the top half of the ellipse. So twice the integral of over the interval will be the area of the ellipse:

The second integral is the area of a circle of radius that is, So

An ellipse defined implicitly by has area

### Circumference[edit]

The circumference of an ellipse is:

where again is the length of the semi-major axis, is the eccentricity and the function is the complete elliptic integral of the second kind,

The circumference of the ellipse may be evaluated in terms of using Gauss's arithmetic-geometric mean;^{[7]} this is a quadratically converging iterative method.^{[8]}

The exact infinite series is:

where is the double factorial. Unfortunately, this series converges rather slowly; however, by expanding in terms of Ivory^{[9]} and Bessel^{[10]} derived an expression that converges much more rapidly,

Ramanujan gives two good approximations for the circumference in §16 of "Modular Equations and Approximations to ";^{[11]} they are

and

The errors in these approximations, which were obtained empirically, are of order and respectively.

More generally, the arc length of a portion of the circumference, as a function of the angle subtended, is given by an incomplete elliptic integral.

The inverse function, the angle subtended as a function of the arc length, is given by the elliptic functions.^{[citation needed]}

Some lower and upper bounds on the circumference of the canonical ellipse with are^{[12]}

Here the upper bound is the circumference of a circumscribed concentric circle passing through the endpoints of the ellipse's major axis, and the lower bound is the perimeter of an inscribed rhombus with vertices at the endpoints of the major and minor axes.

### Curvature[edit]

The curvature is given by radius of curvature at point :

Radius of curvature at the two *vertices* and the centers of curvature:

Radius of curvature at the two *co-vertices* and the centers of curvature:

## Ellipse as quadric[edit]

### General ellipse[edit]

In analytic geometry, the ellipse is defined as a quadric: the set of points of the Cartesian plane that, in non-degenerate cases, satisfy the implicit equation^{[13]}^{[14]}

provided

To distinguish the degenerate cases from the non-degenerate case, let *∆* be the determinant

that is,

Then the ellipse is a non-degenerate real ellipse if and only if *C∆* < 0. If *C∆* > 0, we have an imaginary ellipse, and if *∆* = 0, we have a point ellipse.^{[15]}^{:p.63}

The general equation's coefficients can be obtained from known semi-major axis , semi-minor axis , center coordinates and rotation angle using the following formulae:

These expressions can be derived from the canonical equation (see next section) by substituting the coordinates with expressions for rotation and translation of the coordinate system:

### Canonical form[edit]

Let . Through change of coordinates (a rotation of axes and a translation of axes) the general ellipse can be described by the canonical implicit equation

Here are the point coordinates in the canonical system, whose origin is the center of the ellipse, whose -axis is the unit vector coinciding with the major axis, and whose -axis is the perpendicular vector coinciding with the minor axis. That is, and .

In this system, the center is the origin and the foci are and for eccentricity *e*.

Any ellipse can be obtained by rotation and translation of a canonical ellipse with the proper semi-diameters. The expression of an ellipse centered at is

Moreover, any canonical ellipse can be obtained by scaling the unit circle of , defined by the equation

by factors *a* and *b* along the two axes.

For an ellipse in canonical form, we have

The distances from a point on the ellipse to the left and right foci are and , respectively.

The canonical form coefficients can be obtained from the general form coefficients using the following equations:

where is the angle from the positive horizontal axis to the ellipse's major axis.

## Polar forms[edit]

### Polar form relative to center[edit]

In polar coordinates, with the origin at the center of the ellipse and with the angular coordinate measured from the major axis, the ellipse's equation is^{[15]}^{:p. 75}

### Polar form relative to focus[edit]

If instead we use polar coordinates with the origin at one focus, with the angular coordinate still measured from the major axis, the ellipse's equation is

where the sign in the denominator is negative if the reference direction points towards the center (as illustrated on the right), and positive if that direction points away from the center.

In the slightly more general case of an ellipse with one focus at the origin and the other focus at angular coordinate , the polar form is

The angle in these formulas is called the **true anomaly** of the point. The numerator of these formulas is the **semi-latus rectum** of the ellipse, usually denoted . It is the distance from a focus of the ellipse to the ellipse itself, measured along a line perpendicular to the major axis.

## Ellipse as hypotrochoid[edit]

The ellipse is a special case of the hypotrochoid when *R* = 2*r*, as shown in the adjacent image. The special case of a moving circle with radius inside a circle with radius is called a Tusi couple.

## Ellipses as plane sections of quadrics[edit]

Ellipses appear as plane sections of the following quadrics:

- Ellipsoid
- Elliptic cone
- Elliptic cylinder
- Hyperboloid of one sheet
- Hyperboloid of two sheets

## Applications[edit]

### Physics[edit]

#### Elliptical reflectors and acoustics[edit]

If the water's surface is disturbed at one focus of an elliptical water tank, the circular waves of that disturbance, after reflecting off the walls, converge simultaneously to a single point: the *second focus*. This is a consequence of the total travel length being the same along any wall-bouncing path between the two foci.

Similarly, if a light source is placed at one focus of an elliptic mirror, all light rays on the plane of the ellipse are reflected to the second focus. Since no other smooth curve has such a property, it can be used as an alternative definition of an ellipse. (In the special case of a circle with a source at its center all light would be reflected back to the center.) If the ellipse is rotated along its major axis to produce an ellipsoidal mirror (specifically, a prolate spheroid), this property holds for all rays out of the source. Alternatively, a cylindrical mirror with elliptical cross-section can be used to focus light from a linear fluorescent lamp along a line of the paper; such mirrors are used in some document scanners.

Sound waves are reflected in a similar way, so in a large elliptical room a person standing at one focus can hear a person standing at the other focus remarkably well. The effect is even more evident under a vaulted roof shaped as a section of a prolate spheroid. Such a room is called a *whisper chamber*. The same effect can be demonstrated with two reflectors shaped like the end caps of such a spheroid, placed facing each other at the proper distance. Examples are the National Statuary Hall at the United States Capitol (where John Quincy Adams is said to have used this property for eavesdropping on political matters); the Mormon Tabernacle at Temple Square in Salt Lake City, Utah; at an exhibit on sound at the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago; in front of the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Foellinger Auditorium; and also at a side chamber of the Palace of Charles V, in the Alhambra.

#### Planetary orbits[edit]

In the 17th century, Johannes Kepler discovered that the orbits along which the planets travel around the Sun are ellipses with the Sun [approximately] at one focus, in his first law of planetary motion. Later, Isaac Newton explained this as a corollary of his law of universal gravitation.

More generally, in the gravitational two-body problem, if the two bodies are bound to each other (that is, the total energy is negative), their orbits are similar ellipses with the common barycenter being one of the foci of each ellipse. The other focus of either ellipse has no known physical significance. The orbit of either body in the reference frame of the other is also an ellipse, with the other body at the same focus.

Keplerian elliptical orbits are the result of any radially directed attraction force whose strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Thus, in principle, the motion of two oppositely charged particles in empty space would also be an ellipse. (However, this conclusion ignores losses due to electromagnetic radiation and quantum effects, which become significant when the particles are moving at high speed.)

For elliptical orbits, useful relations involving the eccentricity are:

where

- is the radius at apoapsis (the farthest distance)
- is the radius at periapsis (the closest distance)
- is the length of the semi-major axis

Also, in terms of and , the semi-major axis is their arithmetic mean, the semi-minor axis is their geometric mean, and the semi-latus rectum is their harmonic mean. In other words,

- .

#### Harmonic oscillators[edit]

The general solution for a harmonic oscillator in two or more dimensions is also an ellipse. Such is the case, for instance, of a long pendulum that is free to move in two dimensions; of a mass attached to a fixed point by a perfectly elastic spring; or of any object that moves under influence of an attractive force that is directly proportional to its distance from a fixed attractor. Unlike Keplerian orbits, however, these "harmonic orbits" have the center of attraction at the geometric center of the ellipse, and have fairly simple equations of motion.

#### Phase visualization[edit]

In electronics, the relative phase of two sinusoidal signals can be compared by feeding them to the vertical and horizontal inputs of an oscilloscope. If the display is an ellipse, rather than a straight line, the two signals are out of phase.

#### Elliptical gears[edit]

Two non-circular gears with the same elliptical outline, each pivoting around one focus and positioned at the proper angle, turn smoothly while maintaining contact at all times. Alternatively, they can be connected by a link chain or timing belt, or in the case of a bicycle the main chainring may be elliptical, or an ovoid similar to an ellipse in form. Such elliptical gears may be used in mechanical equipment to produce variable angular speed or torque from a constant rotation of the driving axle, or in the case of a bicycle to allow a varying crank rotation speed with inversely varying mechanical advantage.

Elliptical bicycle gears make it easier for the chain to slide off the cog when changing gears.^{[16]}

An example gear application would be a device that winds thread onto a conical bobbin on a spinning machine. The bobbin would need to wind faster when the thread is near the apex than when it is near the base.^{[17]}

#### Optics[edit]

- In a material that is optically anisotropic (birefringent), the refractive index depends on the direction of the light. The dependency can be described by an index ellipsoid. (If the material is optically isotropic, this ellipsoid is a sphere.)
- In lamp-pumped solid-state lasers, elliptical cylinder-shaped reflectors have been used to direct light from the pump lamp (coaxial with one ellipse focal axis) to the active medium rod (coaxial with the second focal axis).
^{[18]} - In laser-plasma produced EUV light sources used in microchip lithography, EUV light is generated by plasma positioned in the primary focus of an ellipsoid mirror and is collected in the secondary focus at the input of the lithography machine.
^{[19]}

### Statistics and finance[edit]

In statistics, a bivariate random vector (*X*, *Y*) is jointly elliptically distributed if its iso-density contours—loci of equal values of the density function—are ellipses. The concept extends to an arbitrary number of elements of the random vector, in which case in general the iso-density contours are ellipsoids. A special case is the multivariate normal distribution. The elliptical distributions are important in finance because if rates of return on assets are jointly elliptically distributed then all portfolios can be characterized completely by their mean and variance—that is, any two portfolios with identical mean and variance of portfolio return have identical distributions of portfolio return.^{[20]}^{[21]}

### Computer graphics[edit]

Drawing an ellipse as a graphics primitive is common in standard display libraries, such as the MacIntosh QuickDraw API, and Direct2D on Windows. Jack Bresenham at IBM is most famous for the invention of 2D drawing primitives, including line and circle drawing, using only fast integer operations such as addition and branch on carry bit. M. L. V. Pitteway extended Bresenham's algorithm for lines to conics in 1967.^{[22]} Another efficient generalization to draw ellipses was invented in 1984 by Jerry Van Aken.^{[23]}

In 1970 Danny Cohen presented at the "Computer Graphics 1970" conference in England a linear algorithm for drawing ellipses and circles. In 1971, L. B. Smith published similar algorithms for all conic sections and proved them to have good properties.^{[24]} These algorithms need only a few multiplications and additions to calculate each vector.

It is beneficial to use a parametric formulation in computer graphics because the density of points is greatest where there is the most curvature. Thus, the change in slope between each successive point is small, reducing the apparent "jaggedness" of the approximation.

- Drawing with Bézier paths

Composite Bézier curves may also be used to draw an ellipse to sufficient accuracy, since any ellipse may be construed as an affine transformation of a circle. The spline methods used to draw a circle may be used to draw an ellipse, since the constituent Bézier curves behave appropriately under such transformations.

### Optimization theory[edit]

It is sometimes useful to find the minimum bounding ellipse on a set of points. The ellipsoid method is quite useful for attacking this problem.

## See also[edit]

- Apollonius of Perga, the classical authority
- Cartesian oval, a generalization of the ellipse
- Circumconic and inconic
- Conic section
- Ellipse fitting
- Ellipsoid, a higher dimensional analog of an ellipse
- Elliptic coordinates, an orthogonal coordinate system based on families of ellipses and hyperbolae
- Elliptic partial differential equation
- Elliptical distribution, in statistics
- Geodesics on an ellipsoid
- Great ellipse
- Hyperbola
- Kepler's laws of planetary motion
- Matrix representation of conic sections
*n*-ellipse, a generalization of the ellipse for*n*foci- Oval
- Parabola
- Rytz’s construction, a method for finding the ellipse axes from conjugate diameters or a parallelogram
- Spheroid, the ellipsoid obtained by rotating an ellipse about its major or minor axis
- Stadium (geometry), a two-dimensional geometric shape constructed of a rectangle with semicircles at a pair of opposite sides
- Steiner circumellipse, the unique ellipse circumscribing a triangle and sharing its centroid
- Steiner inellipse, the unique ellipse inscribed in a triangle with tangencies at the sides' midpoints
- Superellipse, a generalization of an ellipse that can look more rectangular or more "pointy"
- True, eccentric, and mean anomaly

## Notes[edit]

**^**Apostol, Tom M.; Mnatsakanian, Mamikon A. (2012),*New Horizons in Geometry*, The Dolciani Mathematical Expositions #47, The Mathematical Association of America, p. 251, ISBN 978-0-88385-354-2**^**The German term for this circle is*Leitkreis*which can be translated as "Director circle", but that term has a different meaning in the English literature (see Director circle).**^**K. Strubecker:*Vorlesungen über Darstellende Geometrie*, GÖTTINGEN, VANDENHOECK & RUPRECHT, 1967, p. 26**^**J. van Mannen:*Seventeenth century instruments for drawing conic sections.*In:*The Mathematical Gazette.*Vol. 76, 1992, p. 222–230.**^**E. Hartmann: Lecture Note '**Planar Circle Geometries'**, an Introduction to Möbius-, Laguerre- and Minkowski Planes, p. 55**^**W. Benz,*Vorlesungen über Geomerie der Algebren*, Springer (1973)**^**Carlson, B. C. (2010), "Elliptic Integrals", in Olver, Frank W. J.; Lozier, Daniel M.; Boisvert, Ronald F.; Clark, Charles W.,*NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions*, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0521192255, MR 2723248**^***Python code for the circumference of an ellipse in terms of the complete elliptic integral of the second kind*, retrieved 2013-12-28**^**Ivory, J. (1798). "A new series for the rectification of the ellipsis".*Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh*.**4**: 177–190. doi:10.1017/s0080456800030817.**^**Bessel, F. W. (2010). "The calculation of longitude and latitude from geodesic measurements (1825)".*Astron. Nachr*.**331**(8): 852–861. arXiv:0908.1824. Bibcode:2010AN....331..852K. doi:10.1002/asna.201011352. Englisch translation of Bessel, F. W. (1825). "Über die Berechnung der geographischen Längen und Breiten aus geodätischen Vermesssungen".*Astron. Nachr*.**4**: 241–254. arXiv:0908.1823. Bibcode:1825AN......4..241B. doi:10.1002/asna.18260041601.**^**Ramanujan, Srinivasa, (1914). "Modular Equations and Approximations to π".*Quart. J. Pure App. Math*.**45**: 350–372.**^**Jameson, G.J.O. (2014). "Inequalities for the perimeter of an ellipse".*Mathematical Gazette*.**98**: 227–234. doi:10.1017/S002555720000125X.**^**Larson, Ron; Hostetler, Robert P.; Falvo, David C. (2006). "Chapter 10".*Precalculus with Limits*. Cengage Learning. p. 767. ISBN 0-618-66089-5.**^**Young, Cynthia Y. (2010). "Chapter 9".*Precalculus*. John Wiley and Sons. p. 831. ISBN 0-471-75684-9.- ^
^{a}^{b}Lawrence, J. Dennis,*A Catalog of Special Plane Curves*, Dover Publ., 1972. **^**David Drew. "Elliptical Gears". [1]**^**Grant, George B. (1906).*A treatise on gear wheels*. Philadelphia Gear Works. p. 72.**^**Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology - lamp-pumped lasers, arc lamps, flash lamps, high-power, Nd:YAG laser**^**"Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-05-17. Retrieved 2013-06-20.**^**Chamberlain, G. (February 1983). "A characterization of the distributions that imply mean—Variance utility functions".*Journal of Economic Theory*.**29**(1): 185–201. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(83)90129-1.**^**Owen, J.; Rabinovitch, R. (June 1983). "On the class of elliptical distributions and their applications to the theory of portfolio choice".*Journal of Finance*.**38**: 745–752. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb02499.x. JSTOR 2328079.**^**Pitteway, M.L.V. (1967). "Algorithm for drawing ellipses or hyperbolae with a digital plotter".*The Computer Journal*.**10**(3): 282–9. doi:10.1093/comjnl/10.3.282.**^**Van Aken, J.R. (September 1984). "An Efficient Ellipse-Drawing Algorithm".*IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications*.**4**(9): 24–35. doi:10.1109/MCG.1984.275994.**^**Smith, L.B. (1971). "Drawing ellipses, hyperbolae or parabolae with a fixed number of points".*The Computer Journal*.**14**(1): 81–86. doi:10.1093/comjnl/14.1.81.

## References[edit]

- Besant, W.H. (1907). "Chapter III. The Ellipse".
*Conic Sections*. London: George Bell and Sons. p. 50. - Coxeter, H.S.M. (1969).
*Introduction to Geometry*(2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. pp. 115–9. - Meserve, Bruce E. (1983) [1959],
*Fundamental Concepts of Geometry*, Dover, ISBN 0-486-63415-9 - Miller, Charles D.; Lial, Margaret L.; Schneider, David I. (1990).
*Fundamentals of College Algebra*(3rd ed.). Scott Foresman/Little. p. 381. ISBN 0-673-38638-4.

## External links[edit]

- Quotations related to Ellipse at Wikiquote
- Media related to Ellipses at Wikimedia Commons
- Ellipse (mathematics) at
*Encyclopædia Britannica* - ellipse at PlanetMath.org.
- Weisstein, Eric W. "Ellipse".
*MathWorld*. - Weisstein, Eric W. "Ellipse as special case of hypotrochoid".
*MathWorld*. - Apollonius' Derivation of the Ellipse at Convergence
*The Shape and History of The Ellipse in Washington, D.C.*by Clark Kimberling- Ellipse circumference calculator
- Collection of animated ellipse demonstrations
- Ivanov, A.B. (2001) [1994], "Ellipse", in Hazewinkel, Michiel,
*Encyclopedia of Mathematics*, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4 - Trammel according Frans van Schooten