# Method of complements

In mathematics and computing, the **method of complements** is a technique used to subtract one number from another using only addition of positive numbers. This method was commonly used in mechanical calculators and is still used in modern computers.

The *nines' complement* of a number is formed by replacing each digit with nine minus that digit. To subtract a decimal number *y* (the subtrahend) from another number *x* (the minuend) two methods may be used:

In the first method the nines' complement of *x* is added to *y*. Then the nines' complement of the result obtained is formed to produce the desired result.

In the second method the nines' complement of *y* is added to *x* and one is added to the sum. The leading digit '1' of the result is then discarded. Discarding the initial '1' is especially convenient on calculators or computers that use a fixed number of digits: there is nowhere for it to go so it is simply lost during the calculation. The nines' complement plus one is known as the *ten's complement.*

The method of complements can be extended to other number bases (radices); in particular, it is used on most digital computers to perform subtraction, represent negative numbers in base 2 or binary arithmetic and test underflow and overflow in calculation.
^{[1]}

## Contents

## Numeric complements[edit]

The **radix complement** of an *n* digit number *y* in radix *b* is, by definition, . The radix complement is most easily obtained by adding 1 to the **diminished radix complement**, which is . Since is the digit repeated *n* times (because ; see also Geometric series Formula), the diminished radix complement of a number is found by complementing each digit with respect to (that is, subtracting each digit in *y* from ).

The subtraction of *y* from *x* may be performed as follows.
Adding the diminished radix complement of *x* to *y* results in the value or which is the diminished radix complement of , except for possible padding digits . The diminished radix complement of this is the value . Alternatively, adding the radix complement of *y* to *x* results in the value or . Assuming *y ≤ x* , the result will always be greater or equal to and dropping the initial '1' is the same as subtracting , making the result or just , the desired result.

In the decimal numbering system, the radix complement is called the *ten's complement* and the diminished radix complement the *nines' complement*. In binary, the radix complement is called the *two's complement* and the diminished radix complement the *ones' complement*. The naming of complements in other bases is similar. Some people, notably Donald Knuth, recommend using the placement of the apostrophe to distinguish between the radix complement and the diminished radix complement. In this usage, the *four's complement* refers to the radix complement of a number in base four while *fours' complement* is the diminished radix complement of a number in base 5. However, the distinction is not important when the radix is apparent (nearly always), and the subtle difference in apostrophe placement is not common practice. Most writers use *one's* and *nine's complement*, and many style manuals leave out the apostrophe, recommending *ones* and *nines complement*.

## Decimal example[edit]

Digit | Nines' complement |
---|---|

0 | 9 |

1 | 8 |

2 | 7 |

3 | 6 |

4 | 5 |

5 | 4 |

6 | 3 |

7 | 2 |

8 | 1 |

9 | 0 |

The nines' complement of a decimal digit is the number that must be added to it to produce 9; the complement of 3 is 6, the complement of 7 is 2, and so on, see table. To form the nines' complement of a larger number, each digit is replaced by its nines' complement.

Consider the following subtraction problem:

873 (x, the minuend) - 218 (y, the subtrahend)

### First method[edit]

We compute the nines' complement of the minuend, 873. Add that to the subtrahend 218, then calculate the nines' complement of the result.

126 (nines' complement of x) + 218 (y, the subtrahend)

=

344

Now calculate the nines' complement of the result

344 (result) 655 (nine's complement of result, the correct answer)

### Second method[edit]

We compute the nines' complement of 218, which is 781. Because 218 is three digits long, this is the same as subtracting 218 from 999.

Next, the sum of *x* and the nines' complement of *y* is taken:

873 (x) + 781 (nines' complement of y = 999-y)

=

1654 (999 + x-y)

The leading "1" digit is then dropped, giving 654.

1654 -1000 -(999 + 1)

=

654 (x-y-1)

This is not yet correct. We have essentially added 999 to the equation in the first step. Then we removed 1000 when we dropped the leading 1 in the result 1654 above. This will thus make the answer we get (654) one less than the correct answer . To fix this, we must add 1 to our answer:

654 +1

=

655 (x-y)

Adding a 1 gives 655, the correct answer to our original subtraction problem.

### Magnitude of numbers[edit]

In the following example the result of the subtraction has fewer digits than *x*:

123410 (x, the minuend) - 123401 (y, the subtrahend)

Using the first method the sum of the nines' complement of *x* and *y* is

876589 (nines' complement of x) + 123401 (y)

=

999990

The nines' complement of 999990 is 000009. Removing the leading zeros gives 9 the desired result.

If the subtrahend, *y*, has fewer digits than the minuend, *x*, leading zeros must be added in the second method. These zeros become leading nines when the complement is taken. For example:

48032 (x) - 391 (y)

can be rewritten

48032 (x) - 00391 (y with leading zeros)

Replacing 00391 with its nines' complement and adding 1 produces the sum:

48032 (x) + 99608 (nines' complement of y) + 1

=

147641

Dropping the leading"1" gives the correct answer: 47641.

## binary method[edit]

Binary digit |
Ones' complement |
---|---|

0 | 1 |

1 | 0 |

The method of complements is especially useful in binary (radix 2) since the ones' complement is very easily obtained by inverting each bit (changing '0' to '1' and vice versa). Adding 1 to get the two's complement can be done by simulating a carry into the least significant bit. For example:

01100100 (x, equals decimal 100) - 00010110 (y, equals decimal 22)

becomes the sum:

01100100 (x) + 11101001 (ones' complement of y) + 1 (to get the two's complement)

=

101001110

Dropping the initial "1" gives the answer: 01001110 (equals decimal 78)

## Negative number representations[edit]

The method of complements normally assumes that the operands are positive and that *y* ≤ *x*, logical constraints given that adding and subtracting arbitrary integers is normally done by comparing signs, adding the two or subtracting the smaller from the larger, and giving the result the correct sign.

Let's see what happens if *x* < *y*. In that case, there will not be a "1" digit to cross out after the addition since will be less than . For example, (in decimal):

185 (x) - 329 (y)

Complementing *y* and adding gives:

185 (x) + 670 (nines' complement of y) + 1

=

856

This is obviously the wrong answer; the expected answer is -144. But it isn't as far off as it seems; 856 happens to be the ten's complement of 144. This issue can be addressed in three ways:

- Ignore the issue. This is reasonable if a person is operating a calculating device that doesn't support negative numbers since comparing the two operands before the calculation so they can be entered in the proper order, and verifying that the result is reasonable, is easy for humans to do.
- Represent negative numbers as radix complements of their positive counterparts. Numbers less than are considered positive; the rest are considered negative (and their magnitude can be obtained by taking the radix complement). This works best for even radices since the sign can be determined by looking at the first digit. For example, numbers in ten's complement notation are positive if the first digit is 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4, and negative if 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9. And it works very well in binary since the first bit can be considered a sign bit: the number is positive if the sign bit is 0 and negative if it is 1. Indeed, two's complement is used in most modern computers to represent signed numbers.
- Complement the result if there is no carry out of the most significant digit (an indication that
*x*was less than*y*). This is easier to implement with digital circuits than comparing and swapping the operands. But since taking the radix complement requires adding 1, it is difficult to do directly. Fortunately, a trick can be used to get around this addition: Instead of always setting a carry into the least significant digit when subtracting, the carry out of the most significant digit is used as the carry input into the least significant digit (an operation called an*end-around carry*). So if*y*≤*x*, the carry from the most significant digit that would normally be ignored is added, producing the correct result. And if not, the 1 is not added and the result is one less than the radix complement of the answer, or the diminished radix complement, which does not require an addition to obtain. This method is used by computers that use sign-and-magnitude to represent signed numbers.....

## Practical uses[edit]

The method of complements was used in many mechanical calculators as an alternative to running the gears backwards. For example:

- Pascal's calculator had two sets of result digits, a black set displaying the normal result and a red set displaying the nines' complement of this. A horizontal slat was used to cover up one of these sets, exposing the other. To subtract, the red digits were exposed and set to 0. Then the nines' complement of the minuend was entered. On some machine this could be done by dialing in the minuhend using inner wheels of complements (i.e. without having to mentally determine the nines' complement of the minuhend). In displaying that data in the complement window (red set), the operator could see the nines' complement of the nines' complement of the minuhend, that is the minuhend. The slat was then moved to expose the black digits (which now displayed the nines' complement of the minuhend) and the subtrahend was added by dialing it in. Finally, the operator had to move the slat again to read the correct answer.
- The Comptometer had nines' complement digits printed in smaller type along with the normal digits on each key. To subtract, the operator was expected to mentally subtract 1 from the subtrahend and enter the result using the smaller digits. Since subtracting 1 before complementing is equivalent to adding 1 afterwards, the operator would thus effectively add the ten's complement of the subtrahend. The operator also needed to hold down the "subtraction cutoff tab" corresponding to the leftmost digit of the answer. This tab prevented the carry from being propagated past it, the Comptometer's method of dropping the initial 1 from the result.
^{[2]} - The Curta calculator used the method of complements for subtraction, and managed to hide this from the user. Numbers were entered using digit input slides along the side of the device. The number on each slide was added to a result counter by a gearing mechanism which engaged cams on a rotating "echelon drum" (a.k.a. "step drum"). The drum was turned by use of a crank on the top of the instrument. The number of cams encountered by each digit as the crank turned was determined by the value of that digit. For example, if a slide is set to its "6" position, a row of 6 cams would be encountered around the drum corresponding to that position. For subtraction, the drum was shifted slightly before it was turned, which moved a different row of cams into position. This alternate row contained the nines' complement of the digits. Thus, the row of 6 cams that had been in position for addition now had a row with 3 cams. The shifted drum also engaged one extra cam which added 1 to the result (as required for the method of complements). The always present ten's complement "overflow 1" which carried out beyond the most significant digit of the results register was, in effect, discarded.

### In computers[edit]

Use of the method of complements is ubiquitous in digital computers, regardless of the representation used for signed numbers. However, the circuitry required depends on the representation:

- If two's complement representation is used, subtraction requires only inverting the bits of the subtrahend and setting a carry into the rightmost bit.
- Using ones' complement representation requires inverting the bits of the subtrahend and connecting the carry out of the most significant bit to the carry in of the least significant bit (end-around carry).
- Using sign-magnitude representation requires only complementing the sign bit of the subtrahend and adding, but the addition/subtraction logic needs to compare the sign bits, complement one of the inputs if they are different, implement an end-around carry, and complement the result if there was no carry from the most significant bit.

### Manual uses[edit]

The method of complements was used to correct errors when accounting books were written by hand. To remove an entry from a column of numbers, the accountant could add a new entry with the ten's complement of the number to subtract. A bar was added over the digits of this entry to denote its special status. It was then possible to add the whole column of figures to obtain the corrected result.

Complementing the sum is handy for cashiers making change for a purchase from currency in a single denomination of 1 raised to an integer power of the currency's base. For decimal currencies that would be 10, 100, 1,000, etc., e.g. a $10.00 bill.

## In grade school education[edit]

In grade schools, students are sometimes taught the method of complements as a shortcut useful in mental arithmetic.^{[3]} Subtraction is done by adding the ten's complement of the subtrahend, which is the nines' complement plus 1. The result of this addition used when it is clear that the difference will be positive, otherwise the ten's complement of the addition's result is used with it marked as negative. The same technique works for subtracting on an adding machine.

## See also[edit]

- Two's complement - special case for binary computers

## References[edit]

**^**Florida Tech**^**Easy Instructions for Operation the Controlled Key Comptometer, Comptometer Division, Felt and Tarrant Mfg. Co., Chicago, 1917, p. 12**^**Carl Barnett Allendoerfer (1971).*Principles of Arithmetic and Geometry for Elementary School Teachers*. Macmillan.